Paper Titles

Analysis of Statics and Design of Structur Parameters for a Bionic Robot Hip Joint
p.3

Processing and Modification of Ionic Polymers Metal Composites (IPMC) - A Review
p.13

Forward Kinematics Simulation for a Surgical Robot Using CATIA 5
p.21

Lower Limb Kinetics and Kinematics during Two Different Jumping Methods
p.29

Lower Extremity Jogging Mechanics in Young Female with Mild Hallux valgus
p.37

Effect of Citrate and Hexadecyltrimethylammonium Bromide on the Formation of Hydroxyapatite Crystal in a Thermal Aqueous Solution
p.51

Characterization and Corrosion Behaviour Study on Biocompatible Ti-6Al-4V Component Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting
p.63

Review on Exhaled Hydrogen Peroxide as a Potential Biomarker for Diagnosis of Inflammatory Lung Diseases
p.77

Effect on the Reconstruction of Blood Vessel Geometry to the Thresholds Image Intensity Level for Patient Aneurysm
p.89

HomeJournal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and...Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and...Lower Extremity Jogging Mechanics in Young Female...

Lower Extremity Jogging Mechanics in Young Female with Mild Hallux valgus

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this current study was to measure the knee joint angle and plantar pressure distribution between hallux valgus group and normal group under jogging condition. To reveal relationship of plantar pressure distribution and knee joint angle. Investigated that lower extremity mechanics of jogging in young female with mild hallux valgus. Sixteen young, healthy females volunteered to take part in this study. Kinematic data from a three-dimensional motion analysis system and plantar pressure distribution from Pedar-X system were collected to describe lower extremity mechanics while hallux valgus subjects jogging at a natural speed. The results found that knee joint angle of hallux valgus in frontal and transverse plane was obviously different under jogging condition. In frontal plane, the initial state of adduction angle (control group (CO) = 1.73 °, hallux valgus group (HV) = 8.33 °) of two group was markedly different at the beginning of the support (0-10%). During jogging gait cycle, knee abduction angle peak of normal group was 8.46°, and knee adduction angle peak of hallux valgus group was 8.61°. In the transverse plane, knee external rotation angle in the initial state of normal group was 21.93° while knee external rotation angle of hallux valgus was 4.89°. The results of plantar pressure found that bearing pressure regions was offshore in hallux valgus group. These changes would affect the movement of knee joint, and it suggested that hallux valgus group have higher risk for knee osteoarthritis. These results also suggested that hallux valgus deformity has influence on knee joint. We cannot be ignored in the process of the research and therapeutic with hallux valgus.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Vol. 22

Info:

Periodical:

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Volume 22)

Pages:

37-47

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.22.37

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2015

Authors:

Dong Sun, Feng Ling Li, Yan Zhang, Chang Feng Li, Wen Lan Lian, Yao Dong Gu*

Keywords:

Hallux valgus, Knee Angle, Plantar Pressure

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.A. Mann, M.J. Coughlin, Hallux valgus: etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations, Clinical Orthopedics (1981), 15, 31-41.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198106000-00008

[2] C. Saro, B. Andren, T. L. Fellander, U. Lindgren, A. Arndt, Plantar pressure distribution and pain after distal osteotomy for hallux valgus: a prospective study of 22 patients with 12-month follow-up, The Foot. (2007), 17, 84-93.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2006.11.002

[3] T.J. Lorei, C. Kinast, H. Klarner, D. Rosenbaum, Petrographic, clinical and functional outcome after Scarf osteotomy, Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research (2006), 451, 161-166.

DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229297.29345.09

[4] S. Srivastava, N. C. lingam, T. Fakhri, Radiographic measurements of hallux angles: a review of current techniques, The Foot. (2010), 20(1) 27-31.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2009.12.002

[5] H.B. Menz, S.E. Munteanu, Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity, Rheumatology (2005), 44, 1061-1066.

DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh687

[6] E. Roddy, W. Zhang, M. Doherty, Prevalence and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population, Arthritis Rheum (2008), 59, 857-862.

DOI: 10.1002/art.23709

[7] M. Yavuz, V.J. Hetherington, G. Botek, G.B. Hirschman, L. Bardsley, B.L. Davis, Forefoot plantar shear stress distribution in hallux valgus patients, Gait Posture (2009), 30(2), 257-259.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.002

[8] M. Blomgren, I. Turan, M. Agadir, Gait analysis in hallux valgus, The Journal of Foot Surgery (1991), 30(1), 70-71.

[9] W.C. Hutton, M. Dhanendran, The mechanics of normal and hallux valgus feet-a quantitative study, Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research (1981), 157, 7-13.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198106000-00004

[10] A. Bryant, P. Tinley, K. Singer, Plantar pressure distribution in normal: hallux valgus and hallux limitus feet, The Foot (1999), 9(3), 115-119.

DOI: 10.1054/foot.1999.0538

[11] N.A. Martinez, R.R. Sanchez, B.S. Perez, L.A. Leal, Z. J. Pedrera, Plantar pressures determinants in mild Hallux Valgus, Gait & Posture (2010), 32(3), 425-427.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.015

[12] J. Taranto, M.J. Taranto, A.R. Bryant, K.P. Singer, Analysis of dynamic angle of gait and radiographic features in subjects with hallux abductor valgus and hallux limits, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association (2007), 97(3), 175.

DOI: 10.7547/0970175

[13] M. Nyska, A. Liberson, C. McCabe, K. Linge, L. Klenerman, Plantar foot pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus treated by distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy, Foot and Ankle Surgery (1998), 4(1), 35-41.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9584.1998.00068.x

[14] I.A. Stokes, W.C. Hutton, J.R. Stott, L.W. Lowe, Forces under the hallux valgus foot before and after surgery, Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research (1979), 142, 64-72.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197907000-00011

[15] A. Mapelli, V. Colangelo, F. Sidequersky, I. Annoni, B. Lenci, and C. Sforza, Effect of high-heeled shoes on three-dimensional body COM displacement during walking, Gait & Posture (2012), 35, 33-34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.067

[16] T.S. Keller, A.M. Weisberger, J.L. Ray, S.S. Hasan, R.G. Shiavi, D.M. Spengler, Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running, Clinical Biomechanics (1996), 11(5), 253-258.

DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00068-2

[17] J. Stebbins, M. Harrington, N. Thompson, A. Zavatsky, T. Theologis, Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children, Gait Posture (2006), 23, 401-410.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.03.002

[18] F.L. Li, Y. Zhang, Y.D. Gu. Lower extremity mechanics of jogging in different experienced high-heeled shoe wearers, Int. J. Biomedical Engineering and Technology (2014), 15(1), 59-68.

DOI: 10.1504/ijbet.2014.060991

[19] S. Ahlack, Osteoarthritis of the knee-a radio graphic investigation, Acta Radiological Diagnosis (1968), 277, 70-72.

[20] D.T. Felson, E.L. Radi, What causes knee osteoarthritis: are different compartments susceptible to different risk factors? Journal of Rheumatology (1994), 21 (2), 181-183.

[21] J. T. Dearborn, C. L. Eakinakin, H. B. Skinner, Medial compartment arthrosis of the knee, American Journal of Orthopedics (1996), 25 (1), 18-26.

[22] A. J. Baliunas, et al., Increased knee joint loads during walking are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (2002), 10 (7), 573-579.

DOI: 10.1053/joca.2002.0797

[23] U. Kanatli, A.M. Ozturk, N.G. Ercan, M. Ozalay, B. Daglar, H. Yetkin, Absence of the medial sesamoid bone associated with metatarsophalangeal pain, Clin Anat. (2006), 19, 634-639.

DOI: 10.1002/ca.20282

[24] T.H. Williams, C. Pasapula, A.H. Robinson, Complete sesamoid agenesis: a rare cause of first ray metatarsalgia, Foot Ankle Int. (2009), 30, 465-467.

DOI: 10.3113/fai-2009-0465

[25] C.J. Snijders, J.G. Snijder, and M.M. Philippens, Biomechanics of hallux valgus and spread foot, Foot Ankle (1986), 7, 26-39.

DOI: 10.1177/107110078600700106

[26] I.A. Stokes, W.C. Hutton, and J.R. Stott, Forces acting on the metatarsals during normal walking, Anat. (1979), 129, 579-590.

[27] W.C. Hutton, and M. Dhanendran, The mechanics of normal and hallux valgus feet: a quantitative study, Clinical Orthopedics (1981), 157, 7-13.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198106000-00004

[28] H. Yamamoto, T. Muneta, S. Asahina, and K. Furuya, Forefoot pressures during walking in feet afflicted with hallux valgus, Clinical Orthopedics (1996), 323, 247-253.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199602000-00034

[29] U. Waldecker, Metatarsalgia in hallux valgus deformity: a petrographic analysis, Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (2002), 41(5), 300-308.

DOI: 10.1016/s1067-2516(02)80048-5

[30] N. A Martinez, R. R Sanchez, S. P. Perez, B. S Llana, M. A. Leal, Z. J. Pedrera, Plantar pressures determinants in mild Hallux Valgus, Gait & Posture (2010), 32(3), 425-427.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.015

[31] M. Plank, The pattern of forefoot pressure distribution in hallux valgus, The Foot (1995), 5(1), 8-14.

DOI: 10.1016/0958-2592(95)90026-8

[32] U. Waldecker, Pedographic analysis of hallux valgus deformity, Foot and Ankle Surgery (2004), 10(3), 121-124.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2004.03.004