For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Comparison of the Mathematics and Physics Models Fitting of Velocity Time-Dependent for Usain Bolt in the 100 Metres Sprint
p.11
Biomechanics Analysis of Different Angle of Sole’s Toe-Box Region during Walking and Jogging
p.22
Wavelet Based Machine Learning Technique to Classify the Different Shoulder Movement of Upper Limb Amputee
p.32
Stress Distribution of the Variable Dynamic Loading in the Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
p.44
Temperature Coagulant Tub Variation Effect on the Characteristic of Hollow Fiber Dialyser from Cellulose Acetate Composite D-Glucose Monohydrate
p.53
Effect of Glutaraldehid on Human Amniotic Membrane Characteristics as Wound Dressing
p.61
Regeneration Mechanism of Full Thickness Cartilage Defect Using Combination of Freeze Dried Bovine Cartilage Scaffold - Allogenic Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells - Platelet Rich Plasma Composite (SMPC) Implantation
p.70
Level of Nitrogen Oxide and Indicators of Oxidative-Antioxidative Status in the Gingival Tissues, Blood Plasma in Experimental Chronic Gastritis and Duodenitis and Drug Correction
p.83
Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment Tertiary Failure Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
p.91

Effect of Glutaraldehid on Human Amniotic Membrane Characteristics as Wound Dressing

Article Preview

Abstract:

The wound dressing which have good mechanical properties, non toxic, anti inflammation, anti infection and has potency to accelerate wound healing are important to be found. This study aimed to determine the effect of glutaraldehyde on the human amniotic membrane cross linking, tensile strength, material toxicity and tissue response to a biomaterial which could be applied as an ideal wound dressing. Human amniotic membrane used was derived from one individual and was obtained from the Biomaterial Center and Tissue Bank in Dr. Soetomo General Hospital Surabaya Indonesia while the glutaraldehyde used was a commercial product. The wound dressing from human amniotic membrane-glutaraldehyde was made by dipping the human amniotic membrane with a solution of different variation of glutaraldehyde compositions, ie 0:25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%, and 1.25%. The results of the research also found the pH measurements on human amnion membrane-glutaraldehyde according to skin balance range (4.0-7.0) by adding 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%, and 1.25% glutaraldehid to human amniotic membrane. FTIR characterization test results indicate the change of intensity of tertiary amine group (C-N) in the human amniotic membrane–glutaraldehyde by 0,25%, 0,5%, 0.75%, 1%, and 1.25% glutaraldehyde concentration. The best concentration of glutaraldehyde to be applied as wound dressing was at a concentration of 1%, which was based on the results of tensile test 26.67 MPa, percentage of living cell in the cytotoxicity assay of 113.483%, and Histopathology Anatomy test that shows 100% of wound re-epithelialization on the mice’s skins.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Vol. 31 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Volume 31)

Pages:

61-69

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.31.61

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2017

Authors:

Dian Marta Rizkawati, Izak R. Djony, Prihartini Widiyanti*

Keywords:

Glutaraldehyde, Human Amniotic Membrane, Wound Dressing

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Davis, J. W. 1910. Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Med J 15: 307.

Google Scholar

[2] Trelford JD, Trelford Suaer M. 1979. The amnion in surgery, past and present. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 134: 833-845.

DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90957-8

Google Scholar

[3] Yin, Lan and Yu-Li Pi. 2011. Effect of amnion membrane transplantation on corneal neovascularization in 10 patients with alkali burn. China: Int J Opthalmol.

Google Scholar

[4] Niknejad, Hassan, et al. 2008. Properties of Amniotic Membrane for Potential Use in Tissue Engineering. European Cells and Materials Vol. 15 pages 88-99.

Google Scholar

[5] Peng, Chuangang, et al. 2012. Strain and stress variations in the human amniotic membrane and fresh corpse autologous sciatic nerve in a model of sciatic nerve injury. China: Neural Regeneration Research.

Google Scholar

[6] Tseng SC, Li DQ & Ma X. 1999. Suppression of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4652(199906)179:3<325::aid-jcp10>3.0.co;2-x

Google Scholar

[7] Lee SB, Li DQ, Tan DT, Meller DC, Tseng SC. 2000. Suppression of TGF-beta signaling in both normal conjunctival fibroblasts and pterygial body fibroblasts by amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 20: 325-334.

DOI: 10.1076/0271-3683(200004)2041-5ft325

Google Scholar

[8] Solomon A., et al. 2001. Suppression of interleukin 1α and interleukin 1β in human limbal epithelial cells cultured on the amniotic membrane stromal matrix. Br J Ophthalmol; 85: 444-449.

DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.4.444

Google Scholar

[9] Hao Y., et al. 2000. Identification of antiangiogenic and anti-inflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea; 19: 348-352.

DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200005000-00018

Google Scholar

[10] Kim, J. S., et. al. 2000. Amniotic membrane patching promotes healing and inhibits proteinase activity on wound healing following acute corneal alkali burn. Exp Eye Res; 70: 329-337.

DOI: 10.1006/exer.1999.0794

Google Scholar

[11] Higa, K., et al. 2005. Hyaluronic acid-CD44 interaction mediates the adhesion of lymphocytes by amniotic membrane stroma. Cornea 24: 206-212.

DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000133999.45262.83

Google Scholar

[12] Ni J., et al. 1997. Cystatin E is a novel human cysteine proteinase inhibitor with structural resemblance to family 2 cystatins. J Biol Chem; 272: 10853-10858.

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.16.10853

Google Scholar

[13] Kjaergaard N., et al. 2001. Antibacterial properties of human amnion and chorion in vitro. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 94: 224-229.

Google Scholar

[14] Widyatama, D. 2011. Efektifitas Kombinasi Glutaraldehid dan Didecil Dimetil Amonium Klorida sebagai Desinfektan Terhadap Penurunan Jumlah Bakteri pada Kandang Ayam Layer. Surabaya: Airlangga University.

Google Scholar

[15] Vogel, H. 1987. Age dependence of mechanical and biochemical properties of human skin. Bioengineering and the skin 3, 67–91.

Google Scholar

[16] Peng, Chuangang, et al. 2012. Strain and stress variations in the human amniotic membrane and fresh corpse autologous sciatic nerve in a model of sciatic nerve injury. China: Neural Regeneration Research.

Google Scholar

[17] Shitaba H., Shioya N., Kuroyangi Y. 1997. Development of New Wound Dressing Composed of Spongy Collagen Sheet Containing Dibutyryl Cyclic AMP. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1997; 8: 601-21.

DOI: 10.1163/156856297x00209

Google Scholar

[18] Draye, JP. Delaey B., Van den Voorde A., De Reu B., Schact E. 1998. In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility of Dextran Dialdehyde Cross-Linked gelatin Hydrogel Film. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1677-87.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00049-0

Google Scholar

[19] Spoerl E, Wollensak G, Reber F, Pillunat L, 2004. Cross-linking of human amniotic membrane by glutaraldehyde. Ophthalmic Res. 2004 Mar- Apr; 36(2): 71-7.

DOI: 10.1159/000076884

Google Scholar

[20] Samaniego , A.S., et al. 2009. Human Amnion Tissue as an Anti-adhesion, Anti-inflammatory Barrier in an Ovine Laminectomy Model. Colorado State University, Ft. Collins. CO: USA.

Google Scholar

[21] Pavia, et al. 2009. Introduction to Spectroscopy 4th edition. Washington: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.

Google Scholar

[22] Jui-Yang lai, David hui-Kang Ma, 2013. Glutaraldehyde cross-linking of amniotic membranes affects their nanofirous structures and limbal epithelial cell culture characteristics. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013 8 : 4157–4168.

DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s52731

Google Scholar

[23] Weadock KS, Miller EJ, Keuffel EL, Dunn MG. 1996. Effect of physical crosslinking methods on collagen-fiber durability in proteolytic solutions. J Biomed Mater Res; 32: 221–226.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199610)32:2<221::aid-jbm11>3.0.co;2-m

Google Scholar

[24] Spielmann, H., et al. 2007. The ECVAM International Validation Study on In VitroTests for Acute Skin Irritation: Report on the Validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm Assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test. Germany: ATLA.

DOI: 10.1177/026119290703500614

Google Scholar

[25] Mansjoer, Arif, dkk. 2000. Kapita Selekta Kedokteran Edisi III. Faculty of Medicine of University of Indonesia: Aescullapius.

Google Scholar

[26] Baradaran-Raffi, A., et al. 2007. Amniotic Membrane Transplantation. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH 2007; Vol. 2, No. 1.

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.