For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Synthesis, Molecular Modeling, DNA Damage Interaction, and Antioxidant Potential of Hesperidin Loaded on Gold Nanoparticles
p.17
Blood Pressure Estimation from Photoplethysmography with Motion Artifacts Using Long Short Term Memory Network
p.31
Vasodilatation Measurement Using Finger Vascular Images by Near-Infrared Light and Comparison with RH-PAT
p.41
Master Frame Extraction of Fetal Cardiac Images Using B Mode Ultrasound Images
p.51
A Hybrid Machine Learning Model Based on Global and Local Learner Algorithms for Diabetes Mellitus Prediction
p.65
Comparison of Stress Distribution in Surrounding Bone during Insertion of Dental Implants on Four Implant Threads under the Effect of an Impact: A Finite Element Study
p.89
Cytotoxicity and Ion Release of Functionally Graded Al2O3- Ti Orthopedic Biomaterial
p.103
Heat Treatment Effect on Biological Behavior of Polyetheretherketone Composites
p.119
Synthesis and Characterization of Phosphoric Silica Catalyst from Bamboo Leaves for Production of Triacetin
p.129

Comparison of Stress Distribution in Surrounding Bone during Insertion of Dental Implants on Four Implant Threads under the Effect of an Impact: A Finite Element Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

The design of an implant thread plays a fundamental role in the osseointegration process, particularly in low-density bone. It has been postulated that design features that maximize the surface area available for contact may improve mechanical anchorage and stability in cancellous bone. The primary stability of a dental implant is determined by the mechanical engagement between the implant and bone at the time of implant insertion. The contact area of implant-bone interfaces and the concentrated stresses on the marginal bones are principal concerns of implant designers. Numerous factors influence load transfer at the bone-implant interface, for example, the type of loading, surface structure, amount of surrounding bone, material properties of the implant and implant design. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the impact two different projectile of implant threads on stress distribution in the jawbone using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Vol. 54 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Volume 54)

Pages:

89-101

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.54.89

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2022

Authors:

Djebbar Noureddine*, Abdessamed Bachiri, Benali Boutabout

Keywords:

Dental Implant, Finite Element Method, Impact, Stress Distribution, Thread

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Scarano, M. Degidi, G. Iezzi, G. Petrone, A. Piattelli, Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: a retrospective histological and Histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. (2006) 218-22.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00022.x

Google Scholar

[2] V. Mathieu, R. Vayron, G. Richard, G. Lambert, S. Naili, J. Meningaud, G. Haiat, Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone–implant interface properties, J Biomech. (2014) 3-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.021

Google Scholar

[3] M. Pirmoradian, H. Ajabi Naeeni, M. Firouzbakht, D. Toghraie, M. Khaje khabaz, R. Darabi, Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105258

Google Scholar

[4] E. Orsini, S. Salgarello, M. Bubalo, Z. Lazic, A. Trire, D. Martini, M. Franchi, A. Ruggeri, Histomorphometric evaluation of implant design as a key factor in periimplant bone response: a preliminary study in a dog model, Minerva stomatologica. (2009) 263-275.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Yang, F. He, X. Yang, X. Wang, S. Zhao, Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2008) 1-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.017

Google Scholar

[6] L. Huang, J. Shotwell, H. Wang, Dental implants for orthodontic anchorage, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. (2005) 713-722.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.019

Google Scholar

[7] L. Guehennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, Y. Amouriq, Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration, Dent Mater. (2007) 844-854.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025

Google Scholar

[8] J. Ivanoff, J. Sennerby, C. Johansson, B. Rangert, U. Lekholm, Influence of implant diameter on integration of screw implants, An experimental study in rabbits, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (1997) 141-148.

DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80837-9

Google Scholar

[9] M. Akkocaoglu, S. Uysal, I. Tekdemir, K. Akca, M. Cehreli, Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately placed implants: a human cadaver study, Clin Oral Implants Res. (2004) 202-209.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01099.x

Google Scholar

[10] L. Vidyasagar, P. Apse, Dental implant design and biological effects on bone-implant interface, Baltic Dent Maxillofac J. (2004) 51-54.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Vandeweghe, J. Cosyn, E. Thevissen, J. Teerlinck, H. De-Bruyn, The influence of implant design on bone remodeling around surface‐modified Southern Implants, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. (2012) 655-662.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00308.x

Google Scholar

[12] H. Abuhussein, G. Pagni, A. Rebaudi, H. Wang, The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration, Clinical Oral Implants Research. (2010) 129-136.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x

Google Scholar

[13] M. Herekar, N. Patil, S. Mulani, M. Sethi, O. Padhye, The influence of thread geometry on biomechanical load transfer to bone: A finite element analysis comparing two implant thread designs, Dental Research Journal. (2014) 489-494.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Oswal, U. Amasi, M. Oswal, A. Bhagat, Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: A three‐dimensional finite element analysis, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. (2016) 359-365.

DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.191283

Google Scholar

[15] W. Kleis, P. Kämmerer, S. Hartmann, B. Al-Nawas, W. Wagner, A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report, Clin, Implant Dent,Relat,Res. (2010) 209-218.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00154.x

Google Scholar

[16] Cunha, A. Freitas, M. Marquezan, L. Nojima, Mechanical influence of thread pitch on orthodontic mini-implant stability, Braz Oral Res. (2015) 1-6.

DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2015.vol29.0042

Google Scholar

[17] U. Chaiwat, R. Pimduen, R. Chaiy, K. Pathawee, Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three‐dimensional dynamic finite element study, Clin Exp Dent Res. (2018) 1-12.

DOI: 10.1002/cre2.152

Google Scholar

[18] N. Djebbar, B. Serier, B. Bachir-Bouiadjra, S. Benbarek, A. Drai, Analysis of the effect of load direction on the stress distribution in dental implant, Materials and Design. (2010) 2097–2101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.042

Google Scholar

[19] N. Djebbar, B. Serier, B. Bachir-Bouiadjra, Finite element analysis in static and dynamic behaviors of dental prosthesis, Structural Engineering and Mechanics. (2015) 65-78.

DOI: 10.12989/sem.2015.55.1.065

Google Scholar

[20] N. Djebbar, B. Serier, B. Bachir-Bouiadjra, Stress Distribution of the Variable Dynamic Loading in the Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis, Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. (2017) 44-52.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbbe.31.44

Google Scholar

[21] Ching Lee, S. Chih Lin, K. Ming-Jen, W. Shu-Wei, Ping-Yuen F, Effects of implant threads on the contact area and stress distribution of marginal bone, J Dent Sci. (2010) 156-165.

Google Scholar

[22] M. Pirmoradian, H. Naeeni, M. Firouzbakht, D. Toghraie, M. khabaz, R. Darabi, Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105258

Google Scholar

[23] J. Steigenga, K. Al-Shammari, C. Misch, F. Nociti, H. Wang, Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits, Journal of Periodontol. (2004) 1233-1241.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1233

Google Scholar

[24] J. Geng, Q. Ma, W. Xu, K. Tan, G. Liu, Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. Journal of Oral Rehabil (2004) 233-239.

DOI: 10.1046/j.0305-182x.2003.01213.x

Google Scholar

[25] H. Chun, S. Cheong, J. Han, S. Heo, J. Chung, I. Rhyu, Y. Choi, K. Baik, Y. Ku, M. Kim, Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis, Journal of Oral Rehabil. (2002) 565-574.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00891.x

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.