The Evaluation of Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) in Smartphone to Test X-Ray Tube Radiation Leakage

Article Preview

Abstract:

Radiation detection method has been developed through years. It started from the complex module tools to simple handheld instrument. Recently, the more ease method has been developed with the help of smartphone application. To detect radiation using smartphone usually required the external tools connected to the phone as detector, but there is one application that did not. This application only required complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) part of camera. The application is a game changer in radiation protection because nowadays smartphone is in everyone’s pocket. The application needs to be tested to ensure its effectiveness to detect radiation. The application has been tested by the previous research and it is effective to detect radiation. In this research, CMOS will be tested to detect radiation leakage of x-ray tube. The aim of this research is to find the effectiveness of CMOS in smartphone for radiation leakage detection of x-ray tube. The finding will help the radiation worker detect leakage radiation of x-ray tube using smartphone in case of the absences of surveymeter in the facility. The radiation from x-ray machine were detected and measured three times by Iphone 6s, Xs, and 11 using RadioactivityCounter. To ensure there was a leakage, surveymeter is used as a comparative modul. The data obtained from the experiment was analyzed using t-test. The result show that percentage error of Iphone 6s, Xs, and 11 Consecutively were 93.4%, 98.2%, and 98.9%. which mean CMOS in these said phone could detect and measured radiation ineffectively. This due to the low leaked intensity x-ray that came from x-ray machine. From the T-test anaysis found that only Iphone 11 had linear comparison to surveymeter

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

145-154

Citation:

Online since:

February 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Tiebun, L. Feng, and Z. Rongkun, Recent Advances in Radiation Technologies Enabled by Metal-Halide Preovskite,, Mater. Adv., 2021,.

Google Scholar

[2] B. H. Tonnessen and L. Pounds, Radiation physics,, J. Vasc. Surg., vol. 53, no. 1 SUPPL., pp. 6S-8S, 2011,.

Google Scholar

[3] N. S. A. Rashid, T. M. Yoshandi, S. S. A. A. Majid, F. Mohamed, and K. K. Siong, The study of equivalent dose of uranium in long bean (V. U. Sesquipedalis) and the effect on human,, AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1704, no. 1, p.50013, Jan. 2016,.

DOI: 10.1063/1.4940109

Google Scholar

[4] D. Hamiltom, Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Physics Perspective, vol. 237, no. 1. (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] K. R. Brown and E. Rzucidlo, Acute and chronic radiation injury,, J. Vasc. Surg., vol. 53, no. 1 SUPPL., pp. 15S-21S, 2011,.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Donya, M. Radford, A. ElGuindy, D. Firmin, and M. H. Yacoub, Radiation in medicine: Origins, risks and aspirations,, Glob. Cardiol. Sci. Pract., vol. 2014, no. 4, 2014,.

DOI: 10.5339/gcsp.2014.57

Google Scholar

[7] A. B. Reed, The history of radiation use in medicine,, J. Vasc. Surg., vol. 53, no. 1 SUPPL., pp. 3S-5S, 2011,.

Google Scholar

[8] T. M. Yoshandi, Y. Saputra, and D. R. Gavilla, PENGENALAN BAHAYA RADIASI DALAM KEHIDUPAN SEHARI - HARI The Introduction of Radiation Hazards in Everyday ' s Life STIKes Awal Bros Pekanbaru ,, Awal Bros J. Community Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, p.16–21, (2020).

DOI: 10.54973/jsabp.v1i1.21

Google Scholar

[9] A. L. Nicol, B. A. Chung, and H. T. Benzon, Fluoroscopy and Radiation Safety, Fourth Edi. Elsevier, (2018).

Google Scholar

[10] T. M. Yoshandi, THE FUSION EFFECT OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY IMAGE OF WELDING PLATE DIFFERENT IN POWER TO ITS QUALITY,, J. Renew. Energy Mech., vol. 3, no. 02, p.71–77, 2020,.

DOI: 10.25299/rem.2020.vol3.no02.5225

Google Scholar

[11] J. Seco, B. Clasie, and M. Partridge, Review on the characteristics of radiation detectors for dosimetry and imaging,, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 59, no. 20, pp. R303–R347, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/20/r303

Google Scholar

[12] J. Troughton and D. Atkinson, Amorphous InGaZnO and metal oxide semiconductor devices: An overview and current status,, J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 7, no. 40, p.12388–12414, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1039/c9tc03933c

Google Scholar

[13] R. Sheldon, Definition: Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (SMOS)., https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/CMOS-complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor.

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73145

Google Scholar

[14] T. Ito, Research and development of advanced CMOS technologies,, Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J., vol. 39, no. 1, p.3–8, (2003).

Google Scholar

[15] E. Wagner, R. Sorom, and L. Wiles, Radiation monitoring for the masses,, Health Phys., vol. 110, no. 1, p.37–44, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000407

Google Scholar

[16] O. Burggraaff et al., Standardized spectral and radiometric calibration of consumer cameras,, Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 14, p.19075, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1364/oe.27.019075

Google Scholar

[17] E. Ozdalga, A. Ozdalga, and N. Ahuja, The smartphone in medicine: A review of current and potential use among physicians and students,, J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 14, no. 5, p.1–14, 2012,.

DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1994

Google Scholar

[18] R. J. Gove, CMOS image sensor technology advances for mobile devices, 2nd ed. Elsevier Ltd., (2019).

Google Scholar

[19] O. Van Hoey et al., Radiation dosimetry properties of smartphone CMOS sensors,, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 168, no. 3, p.314–321, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv352

Google Scholar

[20] S. Tith and N. Chankow, Measurement of Gamma-Rays Using Smartphones,, Open J. Appl. Sci., vol. 06, no. 01, p.31–37, 2016,.

DOI: 10.4236/ojapps.2016.61004

Google Scholar

[21] S. Alessandri, In the Field Feasibility of a Simple Method to Check for Radioactivity in Commodities and in the Environment,, PLoS Curr., p.1–11, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1371/currents.dis.07059b54a787dcfcf53ac46ab5a6a809

Google Scholar

[22] A. Mafodda and C. Woda, External dose-rate measurements based on smartphone CMOS sensors,, Radiat. Meas., vol. 137, p.106403, 2020,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2020.106403

Google Scholar

[23] Y.H. Johary, J. Trapp, A. Aamry, H. Aamri, N. Tamam, and A. Sulieman, The suitability of smartphone camera sensors for detecting radiation,, Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p.1–13, 2021,.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92195-y

Google Scholar

[24] S. Gröber, A. Molz, and J. Kuhn, Using smartphones and tablet PCs for β--spectroscopy in an educational experimental setup,, Eur. J. Phys., vol. 35, no. 6, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/35/6/065001

Google Scholar

[25] J. Kuhn, A. Molz, S. Gröber, and J. Frübis, iRadioactivity — Possibilities and Limitations for Using Smartphones and Tablet PCs as Radioactive Counters,, Phys. Teach., vol. 52, no. 6, p.351–356, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1119/1.4893089

Google Scholar

[26] W. Paper, Survey meter measurements of X-ray tube leakage in the loading state,, vol. 1, no. 6, p.1–6, (2020).

Google Scholar

[27] J. Zira, U. Zikirullahi, I. Garba, M. Sidi, M. Umar, and S. Bature, Assessment of Radiation Leakage from Diagnostic Rooms of Radiology Department of a Teaching Hospital in Kano, Northwestern Nigeria,, J. Nucl. Technol. Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, p.135–143, 2020,.

DOI: 10.21608/jntas.2020.23942.1018

Google Scholar

[28] Republic of Indonesia Ministry of Health, KEPMENKES No. 1250/MENKES/SK/XII/2009. Indonesia, (2009).

Google Scholar

[29] B. Utomo et al., Analysis of Tube Leakage of X-Ray Radiation Using Geiger Muller Sensor Equipped with Data Storage,, Indones. J. Electron. Electromed. Eng. Med. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 2, p.78–84, 2022,.

DOI: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v4i2.5

Google Scholar

[30] N. Anitha and P. Dr. Srividya, Comparative Study of Different Technologies to Replace CMOS Technology 1 PhD,, (2017).

Google Scholar