Evaluation of Newly Formulated Chlorhexidine Mouthwash

Peerapong Tua-Ngam; Ratchaporn Srichan; Arthit Klaophimai; Pachara Rudrakanjana; Thanattha Wuttihasa; Rattiporn Kaypetch

doi:10.4028/p-DPPuA9

Paper Titles

Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Extracted from Indonesian’s Eggshell Biogenic Wastes as Bioceramic Materials
p.1

Fabrication of Aligned Alanine Functionalized Hydroxyapatite Nanorods Embedded in Electrospun Gelatin Scaffolds as a Coating Material for Titanium Bone Implant Application
p.9

Viability Base Gel as Potential for Fabricating Crassostrea gigas hydroxyapatite (HA-Crassostrea gigas shell) Gel for Dental Caries Repair
p.15

Inhibition of the Biofilm Formation of Anaerobic Bacteria Involved in Secondary Caries by Dental Adhesive
p.21

Evaluation of Newly Formulated Chlorhexidine Mouthwash
p.27

Antibacterial Activity Edible Coating of Jackfruit Seed Starch and Alginate Incorporated with ZnO Nanoparticles Applied to Cherry Tomatoes
p.33

Physicochemical and Characterization Nano-Calcium Catfish Bone Flour (Clarias gariepinus)
p.43

Anthocyanins from Java Plum Fruits (Syzygium cumini) and Their Stability in Various pHs
p.51

Application of Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC) for Bioremediation of Ammonia
p.63

HomeJournal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and...Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and...Evaluation of Newly Formulated Chlorhexidine...

Evaluation of Newly Formulated Chlorhexidine Mouthwash

Abstract:

Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash has a poor taste during and after rinsing which makes its users dissatisfied. Therefore, the product must be improved to have a better taste and still retain its effectiveness against oral pathogens. To evaluate in vitro antimicrobial activity and toxicity effects of Newly formulated chlorhexidine mouthwash. The antimicrobial activity of the mouthwash was evaluated by Agar well diffusion method against the tested microorganisms. The toxicity test was performed by using the MTT assay. The new formula has the potential to treat and prevent oral and throat infections. The newly developed Chlorhexidine mouthwash can be considered safe for oral usage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

International Symposium on Advanced Materials and Application

View Preview

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Vol. 62

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Volume 62)

Pages:

27-32

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-DPPuA9

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2023

Authors:

Peerapong Tua-Ngam, Ratchaporn Srichan, Arthit Klaophimai, Pachara Rudrakanjana, Thanattha Wuttihasa, Rattiporn Kaypetch*

Keywords:

Antimicrobial Activity, Chlorhexidine Mouthwash, Cytotoxicity, Microorganisms, Oral Pathogen

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] W.G. Wade, M. Addy, In vitro activity of a chlorhexidine-containing mouthwash against subgingival bacteria, J. Periodontol. 60 (1989) 521-525.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.9.521

Google Scholar

[2] T.M. Karpiński, A.K. Szkaradkiewicz, Chlorhexidine--pharmaco-biological activity and application, Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 19 (2015) 1321-1326.

Google Scholar

[3] L.G. DePaola, A.E. Spolarich, Safety and Efficacy of Antimicrobial Mouthrinses in Clinical Practice, ADHA. 81 (2007) 117.

Google Scholar

[4] G. Giuliana, G. Pizzo, M.E. Milici, G.C. Musotto, R. Giangreco, In vitro antifungal properties of mouthrinses containing antimicrobial agents, J. Periodontol. 68 (1997) 729-733.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.8.729

Google Scholar

[5] R. Porras, G.B. Anderson, R. Caffesse, S. Narendran, P.M. Trejo, Clinical response to 2 different therapeutic regimens to treat peri-implant mucositis, J. Periodontol. 73 (2002) 1118-1125.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1118

Google Scholar

[6] G. W. Denton, "Chlorhexidine," In: S. S. Block, Ed., Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, 5th Edition. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001, pp.321-336.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Rolla, H. Loe, C.R. Schiott, Retention of chlorhexidine in the human oral cavity, Arch. Oral Biol. 16 (1971) 1109-1116.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Bonesvoll, P. Lökken, G. Rölla, P.N. Paus, Retention of chlorhexidine in the human oral cavity after mouth rinses, Arch. Oral Biol. 19 (1974) 209-212.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(74)90263-5

Google Scholar

[9] V. Quintas, I. Prada-López, N. Donos, D. Suárez-Quintanilla, I. Tomás, In situ neutralisation of the antibacterial effect of 0.2% Chlorhexidine on salivary microbiota: Quantification of substantivity, Arch. Oral Biol. 60 (2015) 1109-1116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.04.002

Google Scholar

[10] M.J. Winrow, Metabolic studies with radiolabelled chlorhexidine in animals and man, J. Periodontal Res. Suppl. 12 (1973) 45-48.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1973.tb02163.x

Google Scholar

[11] C.E. Berchier, D.E. Slot, G.A. Van der Weijden, the efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse compared with 0.2% on plaque accumulation and periodontal parameters: a systematic review, J. Clin. Periodontol. 37 (2010) 829-839.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01575.x

Google Scholar

[12] L. Trahan, Xylitol: a review of its action on mutans streptococci and dental plaque its clinical significance, Int. Dent. J. 45 (1995) 77-92.

Google Scholar