The Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer for Quality Control of Compaction Operations

Article Preview

Abstract:

The use of a new quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) specification involving Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) testing in concert with conventional moisture and density testing is becoming more and more frequent in various parts of the world. The need for this additional testing is essential, as the regular in-situ density tests cannot alone ensure the compliance of the layers constructed with the compaction requirements. Recent analyses of the correlation between the DCP testing and the California Bearing Ratio CBR testing show that QC and QA DCP testing is adequate to verify compaction, stability and vertical uniformity in both cohesive and granular soils. Two examples of DCP usage in two Israeli earthwork projects, one of clayey soils and the other of silty-sand soils, indicate the benefits of this usage along with, though for the clayey example only, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

49-64

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.W. Larsen, D.J. White and C.T. Jahren, Evaluation of dynamic cone penetration quality for cohesive soil embankment construction pilot project for new specification for quality control and quality assurance. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2082 (2008) 98-100.

DOI: 10.3141/2081-10

Google Scholar

[2] J.A. Siekmeier, D. Young and D. Beberg, Comparison of the dynamic cone penetrometer with other tests during subgrade and granular base characterization in Minnesota, in: S.D. Tayabji and E.O. Lukanen (Eds), Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli, Volume 3, ASTM STP 1375, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000, pp.175-188.

DOI: 10.1520/stp14767s

Google Scholar

[3] M. Livneh and Y. Goldberg, Use of falling weight deflectometer and light drop-weight for quality assessment during road formation and foundation construction. Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1755 (2001) 69-77.

DOI: 10.3141/1755-08

Google Scholar

[4] M.I. Pinard, Innovative compaction techniques for improving the bearing capacity of roads and airfields, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, Volume 3, Trondheim, Norway (1998) 1471-1480.

DOI: 10.1201/9781315100333-322

Google Scholar

[5] P.R. Fleming, Recycled bituminous planings as unbound granular materials for road foundations in the U.K., Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, Volume 3, Trondheim, Norway (1998) 1580-1590.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Chaigneau, R. Gourds and D. Boissier, Compaction control with a dynamic cone penetrometer, Proceedings of International Workshop on Compaction of Soils, Granulate and Powders, ISSMGE, Innsbruck, Austria (2000) 103–109.

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. Gabr, K. Hopkins, J. Coonse and T. Hearne, DCP criteria for performance evaluation of pavement layers, Journal of Performance and Constructed Facilities 14 (2000) 141-148.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2000)14:4(141)

Google Scholar

[8] M.Y. Abu-Farsakh, K. Alshibli, M. Nazzaland and E. Seyman, Assessment of in-situ test technology for construction control of base courses and embankments, Report No. FHWA/LA.04/385, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Livneh, On the statistically based quality control of in-situ stiffness values for the compaction of subgrade and pavement layers, Paper Number P120, Proceedings of the First iSMARTi International Conference on Transport Infrastructure (ICTI), Beijing, China (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] E.M. Rathje, S.G. Wright, K.H. Stokoe II, A. Adams, R. Tobin and M. Salem, Evaluation of non-nuclear methods for compaction control, Publication FHWA/TX-06/0-4835-1, Texas Department of Transportation, College Station, TX (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] E.S. Berney and J.D. Kyzar, Evaluation of non-nuclear soil moisture and density devices for field quality control. Paper No. 12-3516, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (2012).

DOI: 10.3141/2310-03

Google Scholar

[12] Y.C. Cho, K. Kabassi and C. Wang, Framework of non-nuclear methods evaluation for soil qc and qa in highway pavement construction. KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management (2012) 45-52. Information on www.jeepm.org.

DOI: 10.6106/jcepm.2012.2.2.045

Google Scholar

[13] M. Livneh, Uncertainty associated with pre-defined correlative expressions of various in-situ tests outputs, Proceedings of the 2007 Federal Aviation Administration (FFA) Technology Transfer Conference, Atlantic City, NJ (2007).

Google Scholar

[14] E.G. Kleyn, The use of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP). Report 2/74, Transvaal Roads Department, Pretoria, South Africa (1975).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Livneh, The correlation between dynamic cone penetrometer, DCP and CBR Values. Publication No. 87-303, Transportation Research Institute, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (1987).

DOI: 10.3940/rina.wp.2008.11

Google Scholar

[16] V. George, C.N. Rao and R. Shivashankar, PFWD, DCP and CBR for evaluation of lateritic subgrades, International Journal of Pavement Engineering 10 (2009) 189-199.

DOI: 10.1080/10298430802342765

Google Scholar

[17] U.C. Sahoo, Performance evaluation of low volume roads, Ph.D. dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India (2009).

Google Scholar

[18] P.K. Sahoo, Moduli of granular layers and subgrade soils for flexible pavements, Ph.D. dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India (2008).

Google Scholar

[19] C.N. Rao, V. George and R. Shivashankar, PFWD, CBR and DCP evaluation of lateritic subgrades of Dakshina Kannada, India, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, India (2005) 4417-4421.

DOI: 10.1080/10298430802342765

Google Scholar

[20] D.H. Chen, D.F. Lin, P.H. Liau and J. Bilyeu, A correlation between dynamic cone penetrometer values and pavement layer moduli, ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal 28 (2005), 42-49.

DOI: 10.1520/gtj12312

Google Scholar

[21] I. R. Harison, Correlation of CBR and dynamic cone penetrometer strength measurement of soils, Australian Road Research, Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Group Limited 16 (1986) 130-136.

Google Scholar

[22] P.W. Jayawickrama, A.L. Amarasiri and P.E. Regino, Use of dynamic cone penetrometer to control compaction of granular fill, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1736 (2000) 72-80.

DOI: 10.3141/1736-10

Google Scholar

[23] M.A. Gabr, J. Coonse and P.C. Lambe, A potential model for compaction evaluation of piedmont soils using dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP). Geotech. Test. Journal, 24 (2001) 301–313.

DOI: 10.1520/gtj11349j

Google Scholar

[24] R. Salgado and S. Yoon, Dynamic cone penetration test (DCPT) for subgrade assessment, Purdue e-Pubs, Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30. Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (2003).

DOI: 10.5703/1288284313196

Google Scholar

[25] V. George, C.N. Rao and R. Shivashankar, Effect of soil parameters on dynamic cone penetration indices of laterite sub-grade soils from India. Geotech. Geol. Engineering, 27 (2009) 585-593.

DOI: 10.1007/s10706-008-9248-6

Google Scholar

[26] S.I.K. Ampadu and T.D. Arthur, The dynamic cone penetrometer in compaction verification on a model road pavement, Paper ID GTJ12306. Geotech. Test. Journal 29 (2005) 70-79. Information on www.astm.org.

DOI: 10.1520/gtj12306

Google Scholar

[27] M. Livneh, I. Ishai and N. Livneh, Effect of vertical confinement on dynamic cone penetrometer strength values in pavement and subgrade evaluations, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1473 (1995) 1–8.

DOI: 10.3141/1714-12

Google Scholar

[28] M. Livneh, A.N. Livneh and I. Ishai, The Israeli experience with the regular and extended dynamic cone penetrometer for pavement and subsoil-strength evaluation, in: S.D. Tayabji and E.O. Lukanen (Eds), Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli, Volume 3, ASTM STP 1375, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000, pp.189-213.

DOI: 10.1520/stp14768s

Google Scholar

[29] E. Seyman, Laboratory evaluation in-situ tests as potential quality control/quality assurance tools, M.Sc. Thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA (2003).

DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_theses.2601

Google Scholar

[30] R. Anderegg and K. Kaufmann, Intelligent compaction with vibratory rollers feedback control systems in automatic compaction and compaction control, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1868 (2004) 124-134.

DOI: 10.3141/1868-13

Google Scholar

[31] D.L. Petersen, Continuous compaction control MnROAD demonstration. Report No. MN/RC-2005-07, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation Office of Materials and Road Research, Maplewood, MN (2005).

Google Scholar

[32] C. Zambrano, V. Drnevich and P. Bourdeau, Advanced compaction quality control, Purdue e-Pubs, Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/10. Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (2006).

DOI: 10.17973/mmsj.2022_10_2022075

Google Scholar

[33] D.J. White, P.K.R. Vennapusa, H.H. Gieselman, L.J. Johanson and J. Siekmeier, Alternatives to heavy test rolling for cohesive subgrade assessment, Proceedings of Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields Conference, Volume 1, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois (2009) 45-55.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203865286.ch6

Google Scholar

[34] M.D. Nazzal, Field evaluation of in-situ test technology for QC/QA during construction of pavement layers and embankments, M.Sc. Thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (2003).

DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_theses.1002

Google Scholar

[35] L.D. Phillips, Field evaluation of rapid airfield assessment technologies, M.Sc. Thesis, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi (2005).

Google Scholar

[36] Y. Desalegn, Developing correlation between DCP and CBR for locally used subgrade materials, M.Sc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University (AAU) School of Graduate Studies and Addis Ababa Institute of Technology-Department of Civil Engineering (2012).

DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.f8880.109119

Google Scholar

[37] Y. C. Jung, S. Jung, N.Z. Siddiki and A. Bobet, Field investigation of engineering properties and uniformity of subgrades chemically treated with LKD, International Journal of Pavement Engineering (2011) 1–12.

DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2011.590194

Google Scholar