Investigation of Combined SVC and TCSC versus IPFC in Enhancing Power System Static Security

Article Preview

Abstract:

Electrical power systems are often required to operate at full loading capacity due to ever increasing demand and transmission line contingencies with limited grid expansion. This results in line overload and operating near system limit, thereby threatening system security. Utilization of existing system can be achieved using Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS) devices without violating system limits. This research investigation involves static security assessment of a modelled IEEE 30-bus test system in MATLAB/SIMULINK/PSAT environment. The security status with the incorporation of combined Static Var Compensator (SVC), Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator (TCSC) and Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) were determined. Prior to this, Contingency Severity Index (CSI) based on Performance Index (PI) of Voltage and Active Power was employed to determine the optimal location of the FACTS devices. Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) was applied to determine the optimal sizing/percentage compensation of FACTS. Subsequently, power system with and without the incorporation of FACTS devices were modelled. The ability of the compensated system to withstand credible transmission line contingencies without violating the normal operating limits (bus voltage and line thermal) was examined and presented. The paper presents how combined SVC/TCSC and an IPFC aided the power system to boost its steady state security in the face of possible line contingencies.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Sekhar and S. Mohanty, An online power system static security assessment module using multi-layer perceptron and radial basis function network,, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 76, no. 1, p.165–173, (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.009

Google Scholar

[2] D. P. Kothari and I. J. Nagrath, Modern Power System Analysis, Third. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Y. Abdelaziz, S. F. Mekhamer, M. A. L. Badr, and H. M. Khattab, Static Security Enhancement and Loss Minimization Using Simulated Annealing,, International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, vol. 5, no. 4, p.30–42, (2013).

DOI: 10.5815/ijisa.2013.04.03

Google Scholar

[4] M. Maharana and S. Malakar, Sensitivity Based Network Contingency Ranking Using Newton Raphson Power Flow Method,, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, vol. 49, no. 4, p.45–49, (2015).

DOI: 10.17950/ijset/v4s2/204

Google Scholar

[5] K. R. Rani, J. Amarnath, and S. Kamakshaiah, Contingency Analysis under Deregulated Power Systems,, Automatic Control and Systems Engineering Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, p.1–8, (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] M. K. Singh and N. Saxena, Performance Analysis and Comparison of Various FACTS Devices in Power System,, International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, p.40–46, (2013).

Google Scholar

[7] X.-P. Zhang, C. Rehtanz, and B. Pal, Flexible AC Transmission Systems : Modelling and Control. Dortmund, Germany: Springer, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] C. Rehtanz and J. J. Zhang, New types of FACTS-devices for power system security and efficiency,, in IEEE Lausanne POWERTECH, Proceedings, 2007, p.293–298.

DOI: 10.1109/pct.2007.4538332

Google Scholar

[9] K. S. Sundar and H. M. Ravikumar, Enhancement of system performance and static security through an optimal placement of SVC,, in IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference, Proceedings/TENCON, 2008, p.19–21.

DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2008.4766799

Google Scholar

[10] G. Shahgholian, M. Mahdavian, M. Janghorbani, I. Eshaghpour, and E. Ganji, Analysis and Simulation of UPFC in Electrical Power System for Power Flow Control,, in IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), 2017, p.62–65.

DOI: 10.1109/ecticon.2017.8096173

Google Scholar

[11] H. Jmii, A. Meddeb, and S. Chebbi, An approach for improving voltage stability by combination of SVC and TCSC,, in 2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications, SETIT 2016, 2017, p.134–141.

DOI: 10.1109/setit.2016.7939855

Google Scholar

[12] E. Buraimoh, F. K. Ariyo, and I. E. Davidson, Power System Static Security Enhancement Through Interline Power Flow Controller,, in IEEE PES & IAS Power Africa Conference, 2018, p.1–6.

DOI: 10.1109/powerafrica.2018.8520992

Google Scholar

[13] P. T. Boggs and J. W. Tolle, Sequential Quadratic Programming for Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization,, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 124, no. 1–2, p.123–137, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(00)00429-5

Google Scholar

[14] J. Carpentier, Static Security Assessment and Control : a Short Survey,, in IEEE Joint International Power Conference Athens Power Tech, 1993. APT 93. Proceedings, 1993, p.1–9.

DOI: 10.1109/apt.1993.686833

Google Scholar

[15] H. M. Khattab, A. A. Y., S. F. Mekhamer, and M. A. L. Badr, Static Security Assessment Using a Probabilistic Neural Network Based Classifier,, The Online Journal on Electronics and Electrical Engineering (OJEEE), vol. 3, no. 4, p.454–461, (2011).

Google Scholar

[16] P. Ramanaiah and J. S. Rao, Contingency Analysis in Deregulated Power System Using FACTS Device ( TCSC ),, International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 10, no. 10, p.44–64, (2014).

Google Scholar