Reliability and Availability of Multi-Channel IEC-61850 Substation Communication Networks for Mission-Critical Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

The introduction of IEC-61850 digital-based Substation Automation System (SAS) eases implementation of elaborate schemes; however, its reliability and availability continue to be investigated for executing mission-critical applications. Independent repairable multi-channel systems with voting capability such as ‘one-out-of-two’ tripping schemes are often used for critical safety-related functions because the individual scheme channels hardly ever fail simultaneously. The system configuration enables the scheme to self-reconfigure when a link failure occurs in one of the channels, as well as being repairable with no interruption to the overall mission. This paper reviews the reliability and availability of evaluation methods to highlight their advantages and disadvantages. Structure-function modelling, as well as Markov process incorporating Systems Thinking and Mathematical Expectation are used to model the reliability of IEC-61850 based SCN to demonstrate the shortcomings of combinatorial methods in the evaluation of mission-critical systems where diagnostic capabilities of the systems and imperfect repairs should be considered. It is evident from the results of the study that system diagnostic capability and repair efficiency cannot be ignored for mission-critical applications for the reason that the simplifying assumptions of combinatorial analysis methods greatly over-state the reliability and availability performance of the system as observed from the results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] V. C. Mathebula and A. K. Saha, Mission Critical Safety Functions in IEC-61850 Based Substation Automation System - A Reliability Review,, Int. J. Eng. Res. Africa, vol. 48, p.149–161, 2020,.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jera.48.149

Google Scholar

[2] I. Ali, M. S. Thomas, S. Gupta, and S. M. S. Hussain, IEC 61850 Substation Communication Network Architecture for Efficient Energy System Automation,, Energy Technol. Policy, p.82–91, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1080/23317000.2015.1043475

Google Scholar

[3] A. Khavnekar, S. Wagh, and A. More, Comparative Analysis of IEC 61850 Edition-I and II Standards for Substation Automation,, 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Comput. Res., no. Iccic, p.1–6, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1109/iccic.2015.7435756

Google Scholar

[4] V. C. Mathebula and A. K. Saha, Coal Fired Power Plant In-Phase Bus Transfer Simulation of Forced and Induced Draught Fan Motors,, in Proceedings - 2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa, SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA 2019, 2019, p.293–298,.

DOI: 10.1109/robomech.2019.8704820

Google Scholar

[5] V. C. Mathebula and A. K. Saha, Development of In-Phase Bus Transfer Scheme Using Matlab Simulink,, in Proceedings - 2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa, SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA 2019, 2019, no. 6, p.275–280,.

DOI: 10.1109/robomech.2019.8704815

Google Scholar

[6] I. Xyngi and M. Popov, IEC61850 overview - where protection meets communication,, in 10th IET International Conference on Developments in Power System Protection (DPSP 2010), 2010, no. April, p.1–5,.

DOI: 10.1049/cp.2010.0321

Google Scholar

[7] S. Roostaee, R. Hooshmand, and M. Ataei, Substation automation system using IEC 61850,, in 2011 5th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2011 - Program and Abstracts, 2011, no. June, p.393–397,.

DOI: 10.1109/peoco.2011.5970443

Google Scholar

[8] K. P. Brand, M. Ostertag, and W. Wimmer, Safety related, distributed functions in substations and the standard IEC 61850,, in 2003 IEEE Bologna PowerTech - Conference Proceedings, 2003, vol. 2, no. July, p.260–264,.

DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2003.1304319

Google Scholar

[9] R. Bell, Introduction & revision of IEC 61508,, Meas. Control, vol. 42, no. 6, p.174–179, 2009,.

DOI: 10.1177/002029400904200603

Google Scholar

[10] M. C. Magro, P. Pinceti, and L. Rocca, Can we use IEC 61850 for safety related functions?,, in EEEIC 2016 - International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, 2016, p.1–6,.

DOI: 10.1109/eeeic.2016.7555402

Google Scholar

[11] M. Caserza Magro, P. Pinceti, L. Rocca, and G. Rossi, Safety related functions with IEC 61850 GOOSE messaging,, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 104, no. November 2017, p.515–523, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.07.033

Google Scholar

[12] J. Cano and D. Rios, Reliability forecasting in complex hardware/software systems,, Proc. - First Int. Conf. Availability, Reliab. Secur. ARES 2006, vol. 2006, p.300–304, 2006,.

DOI: 10.1109/ares.2006.106

Google Scholar

[13] A. Hildebrandt, Calculating the 'probability of failure on demand' (PFD) of complex structures by means of Markov Models,, 4th Pet. Chem. Ind. Conf. Eur. Instrum. Appl. PCIC Eur., p.1–5, 2007,.

DOI: 10.1109/pciceurope.2007.4353993

Google Scholar

[14] G. F. M. Souza and C. A. Gabe, Reliability modeling of partially repairable systems applied on electrical power system,, Proc. - Annu. Reliab. Maintainab. Symp., p.1–6, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1109/ram.2017.7889685

Google Scholar

[15] R. Billinton and R. N. Allan, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, (1984).

Google Scholar

[16] S. Gupta, Reliability Analysis of IEC 61850 Substation Communication Network Architectures,, Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, p.93–98, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.krishisanskriti.org/Publication.html.

Google Scholar

[17] IEEE PSRC Technical Report., Application Considerations of IEC 61850 / UCA 2 for Substation Ethernet Local Area Network Communication for Protection and Control,, (2005).

Google Scholar

[18] N. Das and S. Islam, Analysis of power system communication architectures between substations using IEC 61850,, in 5th Brunei International Conference on Engineering and Technology (BICET 2014), 2015, p.1.06 (6 .)-1.06 (6 .),.

DOI: 10.1049/cp.2014.1060

Google Scholar

[19] S. K. Kim and Y. S. Kim, Evaluation Process for the Hardware Safety Integrity Level,, World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Mech. Aerospace, Ind. Mechatron. Manuf. Eng., vol. 7, no. 4, p.293–297, (2013).

Google Scholar

[20] J. R. Müller, T. Ständer, and E. Schnieder, Improving system safety modelling in accordance to IEC 61508 by using Monte Carlo simulations,, IFAC Proc. Vol., vol. 2, no. PART 1, p.193–197, 2009,.

DOI: 10.3182/20090610-3-it-4004.00038

Google Scholar

[21] M. G. Kanabar and T. S. Sidhu, Reliability and availability analysis of IEC 61850 based substation communication architectures,, in 2009 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2009, p.1–8,.

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2009.5276001

Google Scholar

[22] L. Andersson, K. P. Brand, C. Brunner, and W. Wimmer, Reliability investigations for SA communication architectures based on IEC 61850,, in 2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech, PowerTech, 2005, p.1–7,.

DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2005.4524707

Google Scholar

[23] S. Mnukwa and A. K. Saha, SCADA and Substation Automation Systems for the Port of Durban Power Supply Upgrade,, 2020,.

DOI: 10.1109/saupec/robmech/prasa48453.2020.9041078

Google Scholar

[24] A. Albarakati et al., Security Monitoring of IEC 61850 Substations Using IEC 62351-7 Network and System Management,, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1109/smartgridcomm.2019.8909710

Google Scholar

[25] A. T. A. Pereira, L. A. C. Lisboa, and A. M. N. Lima, Strategies and techniques applied to IEC 61850 based DSAS architectures,, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1049/cp.2016.0009

Google Scholar

[26] J. STARCK, W. WIMMER, and K. MAJER, SWITCHGEAR OPTIMIZATION USING IEC 61850-9-2,, (2013).

DOI: 10.1049/cp.2013.0616

Google Scholar

[27] S. M. Suhail Hussain, M. A. Aftab, and I. Ali, A novel PRP based deterministic, redundant and resilient IEC 61850 substation communication architecture,, Perspect. Sci., vol. 8, p.747–750, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.077

Google Scholar

[28] N. Das, W. Ma, and S. Islam, Analysis of end-to-end delay characteristics for various packets in IEC 61850 substation communications system,, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1109/aupec.2015.7324831

Google Scholar

[29] R. M. Rahat, M. H. Imam, and N. Das, Comprehensive Analysis of Reliability and Availability of Sub-Station Automation System with IEC 61850,, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1109/icrest.2019.8644416

Google Scholar

[30] S. Kumar, N. Das, and S. Islam, High performance communication redundancy in a digital substation based on IEC 62439-3 with a station bus configuration,, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1109/aupec.2015.7324838

Google Scholar

[31] T. J. Wong and N. Das, Modelling and analysis of IEC 61850 for end-to-end delay characteristics with various packet sizes in modern power substation systems,, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1049/cp.2014.1073

Google Scholar

[32] S. Kumar, N. Das, and ; Syed Islam, Performance Analysis of Substation Automation Systems Architecture Based on IEC 61850,, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1109/aupec.2014.6966532

Google Scholar

[33] J. Á. Araujo, J. Lázaro, A. Astarloa, A. Zuloaga, and J. I. Gárate, PRP and HSR for High Availability Networks in Power Utility Automation: A Method for Redundant Frames Discarding,, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 5, p.2325–2332, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2014.2387474

Google Scholar

[34] B. Yunus, A. Musa, H. S. Ong, A. R. Khalid, and H. Hashim, Reliability and Availability Study on Substation Automation System based on IEC 61850,, 2008,.

DOI: 10.1109/pecon.2008.4762462

Google Scholar

[35] M. Mekkanen, R. Virrankoski, M. Elmusrati, and E. Antila, Reliability evaluation and comparison for next-generation substation function based on IEC 61850 using Monte Carlo simulation,, 2013,.

DOI: 10.1109/iccspa.2013.6487306

Google Scholar

[36] H.-D. Ngo et al., An improved High-availability Seamless Redundancy (HSR) for dependable Substation Automation System.pdf,, 2014,.

DOI: 10.1109/icact.2014.6779094

Google Scholar

[37] W. R. Wessels, Use of the Weibull versus exponential to model part reliability,, in 2007 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2007, no. 2, p.131–135,.

DOI: 10.1109/rams.2007.328115

Google Scholar

[38] J. F. Kitchin, Practical Markov modeling for reliability analysis,, in 1988 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1988, p.290–296,.

DOI: 10.1109/arms.1988.196463

Google Scholar

[39] G. Gupta, R. P. Mishra, and P. Jain, Reliability analysis and identification of critical components using Markov model,, in IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2016, vol. 2016-Janua, p.777–781,.

DOI: 10.1109/ieem.2015.7385753

Google Scholar

[40] B. O. B. Mkandawire, N. Ijumba, and A. Saha, Transformer risk modelling by stochastic augmentation of reliability-centred maintenance,, Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 119, p.471–477, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2014.11.005

Google Scholar

[41] T. C. Sharma and I. Bazovsky, Reliability analysis of large system by Markov techniques,, in 1993 PROCEEDINGS Annual RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY Symposium, 1993, p.260–267,.

DOI: 10.1109/rams.1993.296845

Google Scholar

[42] P. M. Anderson, G. M. Chintaluri, S. M. Magbuhat, and R. F. Ghajar, An improved reliability model for redundant protective systems - Markov models,, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, p.573–578, 1997,.

DOI: 10.1109/59.589606

Google Scholar

[43] L. Ding, H. Wang, J. Jiang, and A. Xu, SIL verification for SRS with diverse redundancy based on system degradation using reliability block diagram,, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 165, no. 114, p.170–187, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.005

Google Scholar

[44] M. Catelani, L. Ciani, and V. Luongo, A new proposal for the analysis of safety instrumented systems,, in 2012 IEEE I2MTC - International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Proceedings, 2012, no. May, p.1612–1616,.

DOI: 10.1109/i2mtc.2012.6229556

Google Scholar

[45] A. Gabriel, C. Ozansoy, and J. Shi, Developments in SIL determination and calculation,, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 177, no. April, p.148–161, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.028

Google Scholar

[46] D. J. Smith, Maintainability and Risk:Practical Methods for Engineers, 8th ed. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, (2011).

Google Scholar

[47] S. Asgarpoor and M. J. Mathine, Reliability Evaluation of Distribution Systems with Non-Exponential Down Times,, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, p.579–584, 1997,.

DOI: 10.1109/59.589607

Google Scholar

[48] E. Zaitseva and V. Levashenko, Construction of a Reliability Structure Function Based on Uncertain Data,, IEEE Trans. Reliab., vol. 65, no. 4, p.1710–1723, 2016,.

DOI: 10.1109/tr.2016.2578948

Google Scholar

[49] Y. Zhang, A. Sprintson, and C. Singh, An integrative approach to reliability analysis of an IEC 61850 digital substation,, IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet., p.1–8, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2012.6345699

Google Scholar

[50] A. Kaufmann, D. Grouchko, and R. Cruon, Mathematical Models for the Study of the Reliability of Systems, vol. 124. London: Academin Press, Inc., (1977).

Google Scholar

[51] T. Winkovich and D. Eckardt, Reliability analysis of safety systems using Markov-chain modelling,, in 2005 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, 2008, p.10 pp.-P.10,.

DOI: 10.1109/epe.2005.219620

Google Scholar

[52] B. O. B. Mkandawire, N. M. Ijumba, and A. K. Saha, Component Risk Trending Based on Systems Thinking Incorporating Markov and Weibull Inferences,, IEEE Syst. J., vol. 9, no. 4, p.1185–1196, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2014.2363384

Google Scholar

[53] M. Al-Kuwaiti, N. Kyriakopoulos, and S. Hussein, A comparative analysis of network dependability, fault-tolerance, reliability, security, and survivability,, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 2, p.106–124, 2009,.

DOI: 10.1109/surv.2009.090208

Google Scholar

[54] C. B. Keating and A. V. Gheorghe, Systems thinking: Foundations for enhancing system of systems engineering,, in 2016 11th Systems of Systems Engineering Conference, SoSE, 2016, p.1–6,.

DOI: 10.1109/sysose.2016.7542957

Google Scholar

[55] D. R. Padhi, P. Chavan, and R. Mitra, Understanding systems thinking from the perspectives of experience and diversity,, in Proceedings - IEEE 9th International Conference on Technology for Education, T4E 2018, 2018, p.122–125,.

DOI: 10.1109/t4e.2018.00033

Google Scholar

[56] R. D. Arnold and J. P. Wade, A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach,, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 44, no. C, p.669–678, 2015,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050

Google Scholar

[57] D. H. Meadows, Thinking in Systems. Earthscan, (2009).

Google Scholar

[58] C. W. Caulfield and S. P. Maj, A case for systems thinking and system dynamics,, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236), 2001, vol. 5, p.2793–2798,.

DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2001.971932

Google Scholar

[59] L. Assidmi, Education dynamics: A systems thinking perspective,, in Proceedings - 2015 5th International Conference on e-Learning, ECONF 2015, 2015, p.188–194,.

DOI: 10.1109/econf.2015.29

Google Scholar

[60] D. H. Kim, Guidelines for Drawing Causal Loop Diagrams,, Syst. Thinker, vol. 3, no. 1, p.5–6, (1992).

Google Scholar

[61] A. Avižienis, J. C. Laprie, B. Randell, and C. Landwehr, Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing,, IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, p.11–33, 2004,.

DOI: 10.1109/tdsc.2004.2

Google Scholar

[62] F. E. Nadir, I. H. Baraka, M. Bsiss, and B. Amami, Influence of failure modes and effects analysis on the average probability of failure on demand for a safety instremented system,, Colloq. Inf. Sci. Technol. Cist, p.867–871, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1109/cist.2016.7805010

Google Scholar

[63] J. V. Bukowski and I. Van Beurden, Impact of proof test effectiveness on safety instrumented system performance,, in Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2009, p.157–163,.

DOI: 10.1109/rams.2009.4914668

Google Scholar

[64] J. V. Bukowski and W. M. Goble, Properly crediting diagnostics in safety instrumented functions for high demand processes,, 2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, p.1–6, 2017,.

DOI: 10.1109/ram.2017.7889648

Google Scholar

[65] David Smith, Reliability, Maintainability and Risk, 9th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier, (2017).

Google Scholar

[66] A. Porras-Vázquez and J. A. Romero-Pérez, A new methodology for facilitating the design of safety-related parts of control systems in machines according to ISO 13849:2006 standard,, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 174, no. February, p.60–70, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.018

Google Scholar

[67] T. Fukuda, M. Hirayama, N. Kasai, and K. Sekine, Evaluation of operative reliability of safety-related part of control system of machine and safety level,, in Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference, 2007, p.2480–2483,.

DOI: 10.1109/sice.2007.4421406

Google Scholar

[68] P. Lerévérend, Inside the standardization jungle: IEC 62061 and ISO 13849-1, complementary or competing?,, 2008,.

DOI: 10.1109/pciceurope.2008.4563534

Google Scholar