Implementation of 5G Communication Network for a Safe Operation of Autonomous and Conventional Ships

Article Preview

Abstract:

The enhanced automation of the shipping industry has increased the demand of real data exchange. The ship-owners are looking more and more to optimize the operational cost of ship, to monitor remotely the cargo and to ensure a satisfactory level of safety and security, in compliance with the international maritime organization requirements. As per international convention for the safety of life at sea requirements, a conventional ship must carry a global maritime distress safety system, depending on the sea areas where it is operating. We assume that assuring a reliable communication service in the shipping industry is a challenging issue, in an era of internet of things and the need for a ship to be continuously connected to its ecosystem. This connectivity should be with a high data rate transmission. However, the future implementation of autonomous ship beside the existing conventional ship as an alternative for a sustainable maritime industry, requires the implementation of a reliable and cost-effective communication carrier, capable to transfer operational data on live basis from ship-to-ship and from ship-to-shore without interruption with a very low latency. To achieve this goal, we propose in this work, the implementation of 5G network as a maritime communication carrier, using unmanned aerial vehicle base stations, which are placed at optimum positions. This placement results in a maximization of uplink and downlink communication data rate, low latency and efficient optimization of transmission power. These make of 5G a potential maritime communication service carrier, capable to support the safe operation of deep-sea conventional vessels and the future deployment of autonomous ships.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

229-248

Citation:

Online since:

November 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X. Jia, Q. Fan, W. Xu, L. Yang, Cross-Tier Dual-Connectivity Designs of Three-Tier Hetnets With Decoupled Uplink/Downlink and Global Coverage Performance Evaluation, J. IEEE Access, (2019), Vol.7,.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2895389

Google Scholar

[2] J. G. Andrews, F. Baccelli, R. K. Ganti, A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks, IEEE Transactions on Communication, (2011) Vol.59, Issue 11, pp.3122-3134.

DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2011.100411.100541

Google Scholar

[3] T. Bai, R. W. Heath, Coverage and Rate Analysis for Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks, IEEE Transactions on Communications, (2015), Vol.14, Issue 2, pp.1100-1114.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2014.2364267

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Chen, Z. Guo, X. Yang, Y. Hu, Q. Zhu, Optimization of Coverage in 5G Self-Organizing Small Cell Networks, Mobile Networks and Applications, Springer, (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0983-x.

DOI: 10.1007/s11036-017-0983-x

Google Scholar

[5] X. Ge, S. Tu, G. Mao, C. X. Wang, T. Han, 5G Ultra-Dense Cellular Networks, IEEE Wireless Communication (2016), pp.71-79.

DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2016.7422408

Google Scholar

[6] X. Ge, H. Jia, Y. Zhong, Y. Xiao, Y. Li, B. Vucetic, Energy Efficient Optimization of Wireless-powered 5G Full Duplex Cellular Networks A Mean Field Game Approach, IEEE Transaction on Green Communication and Networking, 2019, vol. 3, no. 2, p.455–467,.

DOI: 10.1109/tgcn.2019.2904093

Google Scholar

[7] A. Gupta, R. K. Jha, A Survey of 5G Network: Architecture and Emerging Technologies J. IEEE Access, (2015).

DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2461602

Google Scholar

[8] J. Y. J. Sang, P. Xia, J. G. Andrews, Heterogeneous Cellular Networks with Flexible Cell Association: A Comprehensive Downlink SINR Analysis, IEEE Transaction on wireless communications, (2012), Vol. 11, No. 10, pp.3484-3495.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2012.081612.111361

Google Scholar

[9] J. Qiu, D. Grace, G. Ding, M. D. Zakaria, Q. Wu, Air-Ground Heterogeneous Networks for 5G and Beyond via Integrating High and Low Altitude Platforms, IEEE Wireless Communications, (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/mwc.0001.1800575

Google Scholar

[10] A. L. Rezaabad, H. Beyranvand, J. A. Salehi, M. Maier, Ultra-Dense 5G Small Cell Deployment for Fiber and Wireless Backhaul-Aware Infrastructures, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, (2018),.

DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2018.2875114

Google Scholar

[11] A. K. Widiawan, R. Tafazolli, High Altitude Platform Station (HAPS): A Review of New Infrastructure Development for Future Wireless Communications, Wireless Personal Communications (2007) 42:387–404.

DOI: 10.1007/s11277-006-9184-9

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Zhong, T. Q. S. Quek, X. Ge, Heterogeneous Cellular Networks with Spatio-Temporal Traffic: Delay Analysis and Scheduling, J. on Selected Areas in Communications, (2016),.

DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2017.2687379

Google Scholar

[13] A. M. Hayajneh, S. A. R. Zaidi, D. C. McLernon, M. Ghogho, Optimal Dimensioning and Performance Analysis of Drone-Based Wireless Communications, 2016 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), (2016),.

DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2016.7848992

Google Scholar

[14] L. Zhang, N. Ansari, On the Number and 3-D Placement of In-Band Full-Duplex Enabled Drone-mounted Base-stations, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2018,.

DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2018.2867501

Google Scholar

[15] A. Mahmood, M. Q. Usman, K. Shahzad, N. Saddique, Evolution of Optimal 3D placement of UAV with MinimumTransmit Power,J. International Journal of Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp.13-18,.

DOI: 10.11648/j.wcmc.20190701.12

Google Scholar

[16] M. Alzenad, A. El-Keyi, F. Lagum, H. Yanikomeroglu, 3D Placement of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Base Station (UAV-BS) for Energy-Efficient Maximal Coverage, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, (2017), vol. 6, no. 4, p.434–437,.

DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2017.2700840

Google Scholar

[17] M. Azari, F. Rosas, K. C. Chen, S. Pollin, Ultra Reliable UAV Communication Using Altitude and Cooperation Diversity, IEEE Transactions on Communications,.

DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2017.2746105

Google Scholar

[18] J. Chakareski, S. Naqvi, N. Mastronarde, J. Xu, F. Afghah, A. Razi, An Energy Efficient Framework for UAV-Assisted Millimeter Wave 5G Heterogeneous Cellular Networks, IEEE Transactions on Green Communications, (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/tgcn.2019.2892141

Google Scholar

[19] C. T. Cicek, H. Gultekin, B. Tavli, H. Yanikomeroglu, UAV Base Station Location Optimization for Next Generation Wireless Networks: Overview and Future Research Directions, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Unmanned Vehicle Systems (UVS), Muscat, Oman, (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/uvs.2019.8658363

Google Scholar

[20] R. C. Palat, A. Annamalai, J. H. Reed, Cooperative relaying for ad-hoc ground networks using swarm UAVS, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communication Conference, (2005),.

DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2005.1605902

Google Scholar

[21] A. Fouda, A. S. Ibrahim, I. Guvenc, M. Ghosh, UAV-Based in-band Integrated Access and Backhaul for 5G Communications, proceedings of VTC-Fall'18, Chicago, IL, (2018), arXiv:1807.07230 [eess.SP].

DOI: 10.1109/vtcfall.2018.8690860

Google Scholar

[22] S. Iellamo, J. J. Lehtomäki, Z. Khan, Placement of 5G Drone Base Stations by Data Field Clustering, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), 2017,.

DOI: 10.1109/vtcspring.2017.8108590

Google Scholar

[23] X. Lin, J. Xia, Z. Wang, Probabilistic caching placement in UAV-assisted heterogeneous wireless networks, J. Physical Communication 33 (2019) 54–61.

DOI: 10.1016/j.phycom.2019.01.004

Google Scholar

[24] J. Lyu, Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, T. J. Lim, Placement Optimization of UAV-Mounted Mobile Base Stations, IEEE Communications Letters, (2016),.

DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2016.2633248

Google Scholar

[25] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, M. Debbah, Optimal Transport Theory for Power-Efficient Deployment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, IEEE ICC 2016 – Wireless Communications Symposium, (2016).

DOI: 10.1109/icc.2016.7510870

Google Scholar

[26] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, Y. H. Nam, and M. Debbah, A Tutorial on UAVs for Wireless Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Open Problems, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, (2019),.

DOI: 10.1109/comst.2019.2902862

Google Scholar

[27] S. Sekander, H. Tabassum, E. Hossain, Multi-Tier Drone Architecture for 5G/B5G Cellular Networks: Challenges Trends, and Prospects,.

DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2018.1700666

Google Scholar

[28] P. G. Sudheesh, M. Mozaffari, M. Magarini, W. Saad, P. Muthuchidambaranathan, Sum-Rate Analysis for High Altitude Platform (HAP) Drones with Tethered Balloon Relay, IEEE Communications Letters, (2017),.

DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2017.2785847

Google Scholar

[29] Ø. J. Rødseth, B. Kvamstad, D4.3: Evaluation of ship to shore communication links, MUNIN project, MARINTEK, (2012).

Google Scholar

[30] Ø. J. Rødseth, N. Graziosi, R. Nicolè, D2.2.C-1 Research report on broadband applications-Part1: state of the art, Project: Maritime Navigation Information Services, MARINTEK, (2006).

Google Scholar

[31] Ø. J. Rødseth, B. Kvamstad, A. Tjora, F. Drezet, D-D1.3 Ship-shore communication Requirements, MARINTEK, (2009).

Google Scholar

[32] Ø. J. Rødseth, B. Kvamstad, The role of digital communication technology in e-Navigation, MARINTEK, (2009).

Google Scholar

[33] SOLAS: International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1974).

Google Scholar

[34] D. W. Matolak, R. Sun, Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems- Part I: Methods, Measurements, and Model for Over-water setting, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., (2017), Vol. 66, No.1, pp.26-44,.

DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2016.2530306

Google Scholar

[35] H.N. Teodorescu, On Fuzzy Sequences, Fixed Points and Periodicity in Iterated Fuzzy Maps, Int. J. of Computers, Communications, (2011), Vol. VI , No. 4 , pp.749-760, ISSN 1841-9836, E-ISSN 1841-9844.

DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2011.4.2107

Google Scholar

[36] Y. Bai, H. Zhuang, D. Wang, Advanced Fuzzy Logic Technologies in Industrial Applications, Springer-Verlag London Limited (2006).

Google Scholar

[37] A. Fotouhi, M. Ding, M. Hassan, Flying Drone Bas Stations for Macro Hotspots, J. IEEE Access, 2018, Vol. 6, pp.19530-19539.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2817799

Google Scholar

[38] International Communication Union (ITU), Technical characteristics of a VHF data exchange system operating in the VHF band allocated to the maritime mobile service, p.162.

Google Scholar

[39] A. Fotouhi, M.Ding, M. Hassan, Dynamic Base Station Repositioning to Improve Performance of Drone Small Cells, 2016 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps),.

DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2016.7848883

Google Scholar

[40] A. Fotouhi, M. Ding, and M. Hassan, Drone Cells: Improving 5G Spectral Efficiency using Drone-mounted Flying Base Stations, 2017, ArXiv170702041 Cs.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102895

Google Scholar

[41] K.-M. Chen, T.-H. Chang, and T.-S. Lee, Lifetime Maximization for Uplink Transmission in UAV-Enabled Wireless Networks, in 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Marrakesh, Morocco, 2019, p.1–6,.

DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2019.8886053

Google Scholar