Optimum Shear Walls Distribution in Framed Structures for Buildings Subjected to Earthquake Excitations

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reinforced concrete shear walls, which are vertically oriented plate-like elements, are efficient members in controlling the response behavior of buildings against seismic actions. In this research work, the performance of reinforced concrete buildings with shear walls having different shear wall-to-frame stiffness ratios is investigated. The considered buildings were designed in compliance with the requirements of the Algerian seismic code RPA99v2003 and were supposed to be located in regions of high seismicity. Seven 3D finite element models with different shear wall-to-frame stiffness ratios were developed and assessed using the nonlinear static analysis. Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) such as lateral displacement, inter-story drift ratio, shear force, and bending moment along the building height were presented. The results clarified that the induced responses can be classified into two major groups: force-based and displacement-based EDPs. Moreover, as the shear wall-to-frame ratio increases, the observed force-based EDPs increase whereas the displacement-based EDPs decrease. From a force point of view, distributing shear walls so that the packet of stiffness is lumped at the center of the building, model G with a stiffness ratio of 6.0906, amplifies the induced forces. This distribution requires more reinforcements and can lead to a conservative design. From a displacement point of view, distributing shear walls so that the packet of stiffness is lumped at the periphery of the building, model C with a stiffness ratio of 1.7879, minimizes the induced shear force and bending moment and produces the lowest values. This represents the optimum case with maximum performance and minimum strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

55-72

Citation:

Online since:

August 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. C. Hung and P. L. Hsieh, Comparative study on shear failure behavior of squat high-strength steel reinforced concrete shear walls with various high-strength concrete materials, Structures, 23 (2020) 56–68.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.11.002

Google Scholar

[2] A. Tuken and N. A. Siddiqui, Assessment of Shear Wall Quantity in Seismic-Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 38 (2013) 2639–2648.

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-012-0482-0

Google Scholar

[3] Sumanth Chowdary and S. Pandian, A Comparative Study on RCC Structure with and without Shear Wall, Int. J. Sci. Res. Dev., 2 (2014) 916–919.

Google Scholar

[4] Dassault Systemes, Abaqus. Retrieve from http://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/abaqus/. (2017).

Google Scholar

[5] G. Tunç and M. Al-ageedi, A parametric study of the optimum shear wall area for mid-to high-rise rc buildings, Konya J. Eng. Sci., 8 (2020) 601–617.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Rajesh Kumar and P. Bharath Kumar, Effect of shear wall area to floor area ratio on seismic performance of R.C. structures, Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., 9 (2018) 844–852.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Miao, L. Jin, D. Li, X. Du, and B. Zhang, Effect of shear-span ratio and vertical reinforcement ratio on the failure of geometrical-similar RC shear walls, Eng. Fail. Anal., 139 (2022).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106407

Google Scholar

[8] B. Burak and H. G. Comlekoglu, Effect of Shear Wall Area to Floor Area Ratio on the Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, J. Struct. Eng., 139 (2013) 1928–1937.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000785

Google Scholar

[9] N. Aly and K. Galal, Effect of Ductile Shear Wall Ratio and Cross-Section Configuration on Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Wall Buildings, J. Struct. Eng., 146 (2020) 04020020.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002542

Google Scholar

[10] M. A. Cando, M. A. Hube, P. F. Parra, and C. A. Arteta, Effect of stiffness on the seismic performance of code-conforming reinforced concrete shear wall buildings, Eng. Struct., 219 (2020) 110724.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110724

Google Scholar

[11] R. M. Saravanakumar, Optimum Location of Shear Wall in G + 6 Building at the Outer Periphery Using Pushover Analysis, (2022).

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2046019/v1

Google Scholar

[12] R. Banerjee and J. B. Srivastava, Defining Optimum Location of Shear Wall in an Irregular Building by Considering Torsion, Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., 9 (2020) 2247–2251.

DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.d6822.049420

Google Scholar

[13] A. Titiksh and G. Bhatt, Optimum Positioning of Shear Walls for Minimizing the Effects of Lateral Forces in Multistorey-Buildings, Arch. Civ. Eng., 63 (2017) 151–162.

DOI: 10.1515/ace-2017-0010

Google Scholar

[14] I. Computers and Structures, ETABS - Three Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems. Berkeley, California, (1998).

Google Scholar

[15] B. Baral and C. Ghimire, Study on the Optimum Location of Shear Wall in Reinforced Concrete Building, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 8 (2021) 2168-2176.

Google Scholar

[16] R. Patil, A. S. Deshpande, and S. Sambanni, Optimal Location of Shear Wall in High Rise Building Subjected To Seismic Loading, Int. J. Technol. Res. Eng., 3 (2016) 2678–2682.

Google Scholar

[17] M. R. Suresh, The Optimum Location of Shear Wall in High Rise R.C Bulidings Under Lateral Loading, Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., 4 (2015) 184–190.

DOI: 10.15623/ijret.2015.0406031

Google Scholar

[18] O. Soydaş, Evaluation of Shear Wall Indexes for Reinforced Concrete, (2009).

Google Scholar

[19] TEC, Turkish earthquake code, ministry of public works & settlement, 161 (2007).

Google Scholar

[20] RPA99V2003, DTR BC 2-48 Règles Parasismiques Algériennes RPA 99 / version 2003, Cent. Natl. Rech. appliquée en Génie paraSismique, (2003).

Google Scholar

[21] FEMA 440, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, vol. 440, (2005).

Google Scholar

[22] J. H. Thomsen and J. W. Wallace, Displacement-Based Design of Slender Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls—Experimental Verification, J. Struct. Eng., 130 (2004) 618–630.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618)

Google Scholar

[23] J. H. Thomsen IV and J. W. Wallace, Displacement-Based Design of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls: An Experimental Investigation of Walls with Rectangular and T-Shaped Cross-Sections, Natl. Sci. Found., (1995) 1–375.

Google Scholar

[24] O. K. Soureshjani and A. Massumi, Seismic behavior of RC moment resisting structures with concrete shear wall under mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences, Bull. Earthq. Eng., 20 (2022) 1087–1114.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01291-x

Google Scholar

[25] CEN. EN 1998-3, Eurocode 8-Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, (1998).

Google Scholar

[26] ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings volume 1 ATC-40, ATC 40, Appl. Technol. Counc., (1996).

Google Scholar

[27] FEMA 356, American Society of Civil Engineers, FEMA 356 Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, US Fed. Emerg. Manag. Agency, 2000., (2000).

Google Scholar

[28] M. J.B., P. M.J.N., and P. R, Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete, J. Struct. Eng., 114 (1984) 1804–1826.

Google Scholar

[29] H. QI and Y.-G. QI, The Uniaxial Constitutive Models of Reinforcement and Concrete for Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis, Proc. 2014 Int. Conf. Mech. Civ. Eng., 7 (2014) 162–165.

Google Scholar

[30] LATBDSC, An Alternative Procedure for Seismic Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings Located in the Los Angeles Region, (2008).

Google Scholar

[31] A. A. Farghaly, Seismic assessment of slender high rise buildings with different shear walls configurations, Adv. Comput. Des., 1 (2016) 221–234.

DOI: 10.12989/acd.2016.1.3.221

Google Scholar