Relationship Between Stickiness and Surface Roughness Of Composite Materials: Atomic Force Microscopy and Intermolecular Adhesion Force Measurement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Without understanding the property of stickiness there are limits as to how far we can use it and how sticky we can make an object. Understanding of what affects stickiness is critical. Are surface roughness and stickiness related What is the difference between the sticky and non-sticky objects at a molecular level We decided to look at the difference between the sticky and non-sticky objects. We reasoned that if we collect sticky and non-sticky objects and compare them through the naked eye, a high powered microscope, and an atomic force microscope (AFM), then the objects that are stickier will have more surface roughness than the objects that are less sticky. Results from our imaging of and analysis of the force of adhesion (which gives a measure of stickiness) between non-sticky objects and sticky objects through the AFM have shown us a different relationship between the surface roughness and stickiness than we had reasoned – the relationship that we have discovered is that stickiness is inversely related to the surface roughness of the materials. Our findings could be used to design new adhesives with different materials that are stronger, lighter and more cost effective that the adhesives used today.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

225-235

Citation:

Online since:

June 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kurtus, Ron. -Resistive Force of Friction. ‖ School for Champions. (1-31-05). <http: /www. school-for-champions/science/friction. htm>.

Google Scholar

[2] Kunzia, Robert. -Why Does It Stick? - the hypothesis that push-on adhesives use bubbles to create vacuum. ‖ Discover. (2-17-05) <http: /www. findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m1511/is_7_20/ai_55030830>.

Google Scholar

[3] Mechler, A., J. Kokavecz, P. Heszler, R. Lal. Surface energy maps of nanostructures: atomic force microscopy and numerical simulation study. Appl Phys Lett 82: 3740-3742, (2003).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1577392

Google Scholar

[4] Yang, S., Zhang, H., Hsu, S. M., (2007) Correction of Random Surface Roughness on Colloidal Probes in Measuring Adhesion. Langmuir, 23, 1195-1202.

DOI: 10.1021/la0622828

Google Scholar

[5] Hansma, P.K., B. Drake, D. Grigg, C. Prater, G. Gurley, V. Elings, S. Feinstein, R. Lal. A new, optical-lever based atomic force microscope. J. Appl. Phys. 76: 796-799, 1994b.

DOI: 10.1063/1.357751

Google Scholar

[6] Rugar, D.; Hansma, P. -Atomic force microscopy‖, Phys. Today 43(10), 23-30 (1990).

DOI: 10.1063/1.881238

Google Scholar

[7] Almqvist, N., Bhatia, R., S. Banerjee, G. Primbs, N. Desai, R. Lal. (2004).

Google Scholar

[8] Radmacher M, Cleveland JP, Fritz M, Hansma HG, Hansma PK., Mapping interaction forces with the atomic force microscope. Biophys J. 1994 Jun; 66(6): 2159-65.

DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)81011-2

Google Scholar

[9] Abu-Lail, L., Yataoliu, Arzuatabek, Camesano, T., (2007) Quantifying the Adhesion and Interaction Forces Between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Natural Organic Matter. Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8031-8037.

DOI: 10.1021/es071047o

Google Scholar

[10] Li, X., Logan, B. E., (2004) Analysis of Bacterial Adhesion Using a Gradient Force Analysis Method and Colloid Probe Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir, 20, 8817-8822.

DOI: 10.1021/la0488203

Google Scholar

[11] Parbhu, A., W. Bryson, R. Lal. Disulfide bonds in the outer layer of keratin fibers confer higher mechanical rigidity: correlative nano-indentation and elasticity measurement with an AFM. Biochemistry 38: 11755-11761, (1999).

DOI: 10.1021/bi990746d

Google Scholar

[12] Yang, L., Sheldon, B. W., Webster, T. J. (2008) Orthopedic nano diamond coatings: Control of surface properties and their impact on osteoblast adhesion and proliferation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32227

Google Scholar

[13] Quist, A.P., Rhee, S.K., Lin, H, Lal, R. Physiological role of gap-junctional hemichannels. Extracellular calcium-dependent isosmotic volume regulation J. Cell Biol. 148: 106374, 2000. Acknowledgements The work was performed in the laboratory of Dr. Ratnesh Lal at the Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California at Santa Barbara. Due to the potential repair cost, in the event of any damage, atomic force microscopy (AFM) images and force curves were obtained by Dr. Arjan Quist. I thank Dr. Quist for teaching me the techniques of AFM and advance light microscopy imaging and for giving proper guidance and support for the project. I also thank Dr Paul Hansma for proper guidance, encouragement and critical improvement of the presentation and my understanding of the subject matter.

Google Scholar