Effect of Varying Fiber, Fly Ash, and Recycled Gypsum Contents on the Mechanical Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Ternary Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

A concrete mixture formulation consisting of industrial wastes such as fly ash and gypsum from ceramic mold waste as partial replacements for cement was developed in this two-part study to lessen the carbon footprint from processing the conventional materials used in the construction industry. The first part aims to determine the optimum composition of the ternary binder (cement, fly ash and recycled gypsum) and the curing period (7, 28 and 90) that will provide the highest compressive strength for the casted concrete cylinders. The second part focuses on establishing the effective polypropylene fiber (PPF) dosage, utilizing the pre-optimized binder composition. The structural integrity of the concrete cylinders was evaluated through compressive strength and split tensile tests following water curing periods of 7, 28, and 90 days. Results from the initial mechanical tests revealed that the optimum ternary binder composition was C60-F37.5-G2.5 cured for 90 days. While fiber reinforcement typically has limited impact on compressive strength, the addition of 1.5% PPF yielded better long-term compressive strength development compared with other PPF dosages. For tensile strength, 0.5%-1% PPF achieved the highest values at 28 days, whereas 1.5% PPF provided the peak performance under prolonged curing at 90 days. This shift in behavior is attributed to the progressive increase in fiber-bridging effectiveness over time. Findings from these mechanical tests were supported by the results from X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis and optical microscopy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

121-129

Citation:

Online since:

March 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Singh, N., & Middendorf, B. (2020). Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 237, 117455

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455

Google Scholar

[2] Chi, M. C., Huang, R., Wu, T., & Fou, T. (2014). Utilization of Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC) Fly Ash and Coal-Fired Fly Ash in Portland Cement. Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 629-630, 306-313

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.629-630.306

Google Scholar

[3] Afrin, H., Huda, N., & Abbasi, R. (2021). An Overview of Eco-Friendly Alternatives as the Replacement. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 1200 (p.012003). Johor, Malaysia: IOP Publishing Ltd

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1200/1/012003

Google Scholar

[4] Takbiri, K., & Sadeghian, P. (2022). Partial Cement Replacement in Concrete with Gypsum Powder Recycled from Waste Drywalls. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2022 (pp.859-869). Springer, Cham

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-35471-7_60

Google Scholar

[5] Hansen, S., & Sadeghian, P. (2020). Recycled gypsum powder from waste drywalls combined with fly ash. Journal of Cleaner Production Volume 274

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122785

Google Scholar

[6] Song, P., Wu, J., Hwang, S., & Sheu, B. (2005). Statistical analysis of impact strength and strength reliability of steel–polypropylene hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 19, 1-9

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.002

Google Scholar

[7] Blazy, J., & Blazy, R. (2021). Polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete and its application in creating architectural forms of public spaces. Case Studies in Construction Materials

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00549

Google Scholar

[8] Liu, Z., Yuan, X., Zhao, Y., Chew, J. W., & Wang, H. (2022). Concrete waste-derived aggregate for concrete manufacture. Journal for Cleaner Production 338, 130637

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130637

Google Scholar

[9] Dhapekar, N.K. & Majumdar, A & Gupta, P. (2015). Study of phase composition of Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete using X-Ray Diffraction. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6(11).

Google Scholar

[10] Borno, I.B., Haque, M.I. & Ashraf, W. (2023). Crystallization of C-S-H and C-A-S-H in artificial seawater at ambient temperature. Cement and Concrete Research, 173

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107292

Google Scholar

[11] Horkoss, S., Escadeillas, G., Rizk, T., & Lteif, R. (2015). The effect of the source of cement SO3 on the expansion of mortars. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 4, 62–72

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2015.12.004

Google Scholar

[12] Shen, D., Liu, X., Zeng, X., Zhao, X., Jiang, G. (2020). Effect of polypropylene plastic fibers length on cracking resistance of high performance concrete at early age, Construction and Building Materials, 244, 117874, ISSN 0950-0618.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117874

Google Scholar

[13] Ahmad, J., Burduhos-Nergis, D. D., Arbili, M. M., Alogla, S. M., Majdi, A., & Deifalla, A. F. (2022). A review on failure modes and cracking behaviors of polypropylene fibers reinforced concrete. Buildings, 12(11), 1951

DOI: 10.3390/buildings12111951

Google Scholar

[14] Afroughsabet, V., & Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2015). Mechanical and durability properties of high-strength concrete containing steel and polypropylene fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 73–82

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.051

Google Scholar

[15] Jamshidi, M. (2023). The effect of polypropylene fibers on the behavior of Fiber Self-Compacting concrete. Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 5(4), 56–62

DOI: 10.61186/jcer.5.4.56

Google Scholar

[16] Zhang, X., Yin, R., Chen, Y., & Lou, C. (2023). Experimental study on the axial tensile properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete. Scientific Reports, 13(1)

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43723-5

Google Scholar

[17] Harrisson, A.M. (2019). 4 - Constitution and Specification of Portland Cement, Editor(s): Peter C. Hewlett, Martin Liska, Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete (Fifth Edition), 87-155, ISBN 9780081007730

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100773-0.00004-6

Google Scholar

[18] Memon, R.P.; Huseien, G.F.; Saleh, A.T.; K. Ghoshal, S.; Memon, U.; Alwetaishi, M.; Benjeddou, O.; Sam, A.R.M. (2022). Microstructure and Strength Properties of Sustainable Concrete Using Effective Microorganisms as a Self-Curing Agent. Sustainability, 14, 10443

DOI: 10.3390/su141610443

Google Scholar

[19] Walkley, B., Provis, J.L. (2019). Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of cements. Materials Today Advances, 1, 100007, ISSN 2590-0498.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.100007

Google Scholar

[20] Bellmann, F., Sowoidnich, T., Horgnies, M., Gartner, E., (2020). Basic mechanisms of afwillite seeding for acceleration of tricalcium silicate hydration. Cement and Concrete Research, 132. 106030, ISSN 0008-8846

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106030

Google Scholar

[21] Malkit Singh, Rafat Siddique, Jagdeep Singh, (2022). 1 - Coal fly ash, Editor(s): Rafat Siddique, Rafik Belarbi, In Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, Sustainable Concrete Made with Ashes and Dust from Different Sources, Woodhead Publishing, 1-29, ISBN 9780128240502

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824050-2.00012-7

Google Scholar

[22] Wu, D., Xu, Q., Hou, D., Yu, R., Wang, M., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Sui, S., Zhang, M., Song, Q., Wang, X., (2023). Encapsulation of red mud with ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) for immobilization of alkaline and heavy metals: Experiments and simulations. Cement and Concrete Composites, Volume 142, 105152, ISSN 0958-9465

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105152

Google Scholar