Influence of Welding Parameters on 0.4mm Austenitic Stainless-Steel Weld Nuggets

Article Preview

Abstract:

Owing to its superior corrosion resistance properties, thin sheet austenitic stainless-steel grade 304 is widely used in the food and beverage industry. Resistance spot welding (RSW) is a preferred joining method for these sheets because of its speed and efficiency, but RSW can alter the microstructure of the weldments, influencing their strength and corrosion resistance. Parameters such as welding current, time, and electrode force influence weld nugget formation, affecting its shape, size, and strength, while the rapid cooling rate in RSW leads to the formation of skeletal, lathy, and acicular delta ferrite in the weld zone. This study investigates the effect of welding parameters on the microstructure and properties of 0.4 mm AISI 304 stainless steel using peel tests, microstructural analysis, and microhardness testing. Peel test results were used to construct the weld lobe curve for process optimization, and nugget formation under various welding conditions was examined using SEM and EDAX analysis. The pseudo binary phase diagram was used to predict the final weld microstructure, and microhardness measurements confirmed an increase in fusion zone hardness after resistance spot welding. The weld lobe curve revealed that optimal defect free welds without expulsion were obtained at 40 kgf with 3000 to 5000 amperes for 1 to 4 cycles, and at 30 kgf with 5000 to 6000 amperes for 3 to 6 cycles, with electrode force exerting a stronger effect on weld quality than weld time. All welds produced below 4000 amperes at 30 kgf failed through interfacial mode, while weld nuggets above 3 mm diameter within the lobe curve exhibited complete pull out failure. Hardness testing was conducted on samples welded at 40 kgf and revealed that variation in current had a greater influence on fusion zone hardness than changes in weld time from 2 to 5 cycles when current was held constant. Specifically, specimens produced at 2000 amperes showed the highest fusion zone hardness, those at 3000 amperes exhibited intermediate hardness, and samples at 4000 and 5000 amperes had hardness values in the welded zone that closely matched the parent metal. The fusion zone hardness in optimal welds increased to around 200 to 210 HV, while the HAZ in most samples exhibited recrystallization, resulting in hardness values slightly higher than the base metal 195 to 210 HV. In a few samples produced at lower welding current, hardness exceeded 220 HV. Microstructural analysis confirmed the presence of skeletal, lathy, and acicular delta ferrite in both the fusion and heat affected zones, depending on welding current, time, and force. Welds formed with higher current or sufficient heat input favored the development of skeletal delta ferrite, while rapid cooling due to lower heat input resulted in lathy and acicular delta ferrite. All welds exhibited columnar grain growth in the direction of the water cooled electrodes and a distinct heat affected zone surrounding the fusion zone.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

29-39

Citation:

Online since:

March 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.S. Adkine and S. K. Biradar, "A review of the effects of resistance spot welding on metallurgical and mechanical characteristics," Welding International, 2025.

DOI: 10.1080/09507116.2024.2419551

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Abbas, N. S. Khan, and Z. Mehmood, "Design of spot welds for optimal strength of structure," in Proc. 2020 17th Int. Bhurban Conf. Appl. Sci. Technol. (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan, 2020, p.123–130.

DOI: 10.1109/ibcast47879.2020.9044530

Google Scholar

[3] K. Jha, S. K. Tamang, R. Kumar, and B. Choudhury, "Enhancing resistance spot welding weld quality: A comprehensive analysis of influencing factors and the role of modeling and optimization for improved quality," in New Materials, Processing and Manufacturability: Fabrication and Processing of Advanced Materials, 2024, p.45–60.

DOI: 10.1002/9781394212736.ch5

Google Scholar

[4] D.C. Birsan and G. Simion, "Numerical modelling of thermo-mechanical effects developed in resistance spot welding of E304 steel with copper interlayer," Annals of "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Fascicle XII, Welding Equipment and Technology, vol. 34, no. 2, p.12–20, 2022.

DOI: 10.35219/awet.2022.07

Google Scholar

[5] G.F. Gomes, P. Viéville, and L. Durrenberger, "Dynamic behavior investigation of spot welding machines and its influence on weld current range by modal analysis," J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 39, no. 5, p.1789–1800, 2017.

DOI: 10.1007/s40430-016-0580-0

Google Scholar

[6] X. Wu, J. Du, and W. Cai, "Significance of workpiece conductivity on resistance spot welding process map," in Proc. ASME 2019 14th Int. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Conf. (MSEC), Erie, PA, USA, 2019, p.1–10.

DOI: 10.1115/msec2019-2958

Google Scholar

[7] Bhat, S D, V. Vijeesh, Prajwal Acharya and M. Gangadhar Rao. "Investigation of thin sheet stainless steel resistance spot welds: Effect of weld current on nugget failure and microstructure." Materials Today: Proceedings (2020): n. pag.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.350

Google Scholar

[8] R. Kumar, J. S. Chohan, R. Goyal, and P. Chauhan, "Impact of process parameters of resistance spot welding on mechanical properties and micro hardness of stainless-steel 304 weldments," Int. J. Struct. Integr., vol. 11, no. 2, p.234–245, 2020.

DOI: 10.1108/ijsi-03-2020-0031

Google Scholar

[9] H. J. Abid, H. I. Khalaf, F. H. Alazawi, and A. A. Ugla, "Experimental investigation of the effect of spot-welding process parameters on the tensile strength of similar metal joints," Int. Rev. Mech. Eng., vol. 15, no. 3, p.123–130, 2021.

DOI: 10.15866/ireme.v15i2.20221

Google Scholar

[10] F. Ternane, F. Sebaa, M. Benachour, and N. Benachour, "Regression modeling and process analysis of resistance spot welding on dissimilar steel sheets," Eng., Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, p.123–130, 2022.

DOI: 10.48084/etasr.5059

Google Scholar

[11] D. Azzouzi, Y. Benkhedda, and B. Boumeddane, "Parametric study of the nugget growth in spot welding of 304L stainless-steel sheets having equal and unequal thicknesses," SN Appl. Sci., vol. 1, no. 5, p.456, 2019.

DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0655-5

Google Scholar

[12] K. M. Hafez, W. A. Y. Yusoff, N. Fathy, and M. Ismail, "Influence of nitrogen atmosphere on weld nugget morphology during resistance spot welding of 304L stainless-steel," Key Eng. Mater., vol. 739, p.123–130, 2017.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.753.211

Google Scholar

[13] A. Sifa, B. Badruzzaman, F. Dionisius, and N. Alipah, "Weldability and shear strength of cylindrical resistance spot welding stainless-steel 304," AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2456, no. 1, p.030001, 2023.

DOI: 10.1063/5.0113847

Google Scholar

[14] C. Rajarajan, N. Mathiazhagan, P. Sivaraj, T. Sonar, and S. Raja, "Resistance spot welding of advanced high strength steel for fabrication of thin-walled automotive structural frames," Forces in Mechanics, vol. 7, p.100084, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100084

Google Scholar