Method of an Automated Tool Design of Punch-Bending Processes Using the Asset Administration Shell

Article Preview

Abstract:

A common challenge of punch-bending is the control and compensation of process deviations which are induced, e.g., by different material batches. The resulting deviations are currently countered iteratively using expert knowledge in the design phase as well as during the production process. However, this is not always successful due to the complex interactions between semi-finished product properties and forming tools. To automate the optimization of tool geometries and process adjustments, an accurate prediction model of correlations between process/tool parameters and product properties is necessary. In that regard, an application programming interface (API) aligned with the Asset Administration Shell (AAS) specification is developed utilizing a hybrid data-driven approach. It enables the transformation of various data formats e.g., from sensor and simulation data into a machine-readable structure. The API is linked to a digital twin and a database, to automatically gather requested information and provide the new structured data to a machine learning (ML) model. To validate the developed method, hybrid punch-bending data is automatically transferred to an ML model which then returns tool geometry suggestions for a defined product geometry.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Paech, Advanced semi-automatic straightening technology, Wire Journal International (2008) 74–79.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Richter, F. Reuther, R. Müller, D. Landgrebe, Investigating the Influence of Bending Parameters on the Springback Behavior of Ultra-High Strength Spring Strips, MSF (2018) 125–133.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.918.125

Google Scholar

[3] M. Grüber, Konzepte zur Steuerung des Richtwalzprozesses bei variierenden Richtguteigenschaften, PhD thesis, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, 2019. ISBN: 978-3-95886-307-1.

DOI: 10.15420/ecr.2007.0.1.51

Google Scholar

[4] A. Amor, M. Rachik, H. Sfar, Combination of Finite-Element and Semi-Analytical Models for Sheet Metal Leveling Simulation, KEM (2011) 182–189.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.473.182

Google Scholar

[5] M. Gräler, R. Springer, C. Henke, A. Trächtler, W. Homberg, Assisted setup of forming processes: compensation of initial stochastic disturbances, Procedia Manufacturing 25 (2018) 358–364.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.104

Google Scholar

[6] L. Steinweder, A.J. Kainz, K. Krimpelstaetter, K. Zeman, Numerical Simulation of Tension Losses and Reaction Forces in Tension Levellers, Steel Research Intl., Special Edition: 10th ICTP (2011) 343–348.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Liewald, T. Bergs, P. Groche, B.-A. Behrens, D. Briesenick, M. Müller, P. Niemietz, C. Kubik, F. Müller, Perspectives on data-driven models and its potentials in metal forming and blanking technologies, Production Engineering Research and Development 16 (2022) 607–625.

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-022-01115-0

Google Scholar

[8] H. Peters, A. Mazur, A. Trächtler, B. Hammer, Integration of a digital twin for data-driven modeling of punch-bending processes using the asset administration shell, in: P. Carlone, L. Filice, D. Umbrello (Eds.), Material Forming: ESAFORM 2025, Materials Research Forum, 2025, p.1538–1547.

DOI: 10.21741/9781644903599-166

Google Scholar

[9] M. Jacoby, T. Usländer, Digital Twin and Internet of Things - Current Standards Landscape, Applied Sciences 10 (2020) 6519.

DOI: 10.3390/app10186519

Google Scholar

[10] B. Boss, S. Malakuti, S.-W. Lin, T. Usländer, E. Clauer, M. Hoffmeister, L. Stojanovic, Digital Twin and Asset Administration Shell Conepts and Application in the Industrial Internet and Industrie 4.0: An Industrial Internet Consortium and Plattform Industrie 4.0 Whitepaper (2020). https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publikation/Digital-Twin-and-Asset-Administration-Shell-Concepts.pdf.

DOI: 10.1515/auto-2021-0074

Google Scholar

[11] T. Miny, M. Thies, L. Lukic, S. Käbisch, K. Oladipupo, C. Diedrich, T. Kleinert, Overview and Comparison of Asset Information Model Standards, IEEE Access 11 (2023) 99189–99221.

DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3312286

Google Scholar

[12] S. Kamm, S.S. Veekati, T. Müller, N. Jazdi, M. Weyrich, A survey on machine learning based analysis of heterogeneous data in industrial automation, Computers in Industry 149 (2023).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2023.103930

Google Scholar

[13] The Structure of the Administration Shell: Trilateral Perspectives from France, Italy and Germany (2018). https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publikation/hm-2018-trilaterale-coop.html.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Volkmann, A. Wagner, J. Hermann, M. Ruskowski, Asset Administration Shells and GAIA-X Enabled Shared Production Scenario, in: F.J.G. Silva, L.P. Ferreira, J.C. Sá, M.T. Pereira, C.M.A. Pinto (Eds.), Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: Establishing Bridges for More Sustainable Manufacturing Systems: Volume 2, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024, p.187–199.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-38165-2_23

Google Scholar

[15] A. Löcklin, H. Vietz, D. White, T. Ruppert, N. Jazdi, M. Weyrich, Data administration shell for data-science-driven development, Procedia CIRP 100 (2021) 115–120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.019

Google Scholar

[16] M. Pourjafarian, C. Plociennik, M.H. Rimaz, P. Stein, M. Vogelgesang, C. Li, S. Knetsch, S. Bergweiler, M. Ruskowski, A Multi-Stakeholder Digital Product Passport Based on the Asset Administration Shell, in: 2023 IEEE 28th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), IEEE, 2023.

DOI: 10.1109/ETFA54631.2023.10275715

Google Scholar

[17] M.A. Inigo, A. Porto, B. Kremer, A. Perez, F. Larrinaga, J. Cuenca, Towards an Asset Administration Shell scenario: a use case for interoperability and standardization in Industry 4.0, in: P. Varga, D. Zuckerman (Eds.), NOMS 2020 - 2020 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, IEEE, 2020.

DOI: 10.1109/NOMS47738.2020.9110410

Google Scholar

[18] X. Ye, J. Jiang, C. Lee, N. Kim, M. Yu, S.H. Hong, Toward the Plug-and-Produce Capability for Industry 4.0: An Asset Administration Shell Approach, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 14 (2020) 146–157.

DOI: 10.1109/MIE.2020.3010492

Google Scholar

[19] A. Wagner, M. Volkmann, J. Hermann, M. Ruskowski, Machining of Individualized Milled Parts in a Skill-Based Production Environment, in: F.J.G. Silva, A.B. Pereira, R.D.S.G. Campilho (Eds.), Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: Establishing Bridges for More Sustainable Manufacturing Systems: Volume 1, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024, p.283–292.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-38241-3_32

Google Scholar

[20] Z. Muller-Zhang, T. Kuhn, A Digital Twin-based Approach Performing Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling for Service-based Production, in: F. Gao (Ed.), 2022 IEEE 27th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), IEEE, 2022.

DOI: 10.1109/ETFA52439.2022.9921643

Google Scholar

[21] A. Alexopoulos, G. Kalogeras, K. Koutras, A. Kalogeras, Why Asset Administration Shells: A Survey on Uses and Challenges, IEEE Access 13 (2025) 126582–126609.

DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3589931

Google Scholar

[22] S. Wurm, V. Lohrmann, M. Wieczorek, P. Blanke, C. Fimmers, O. Petrovic, W. Herfs, Service-based tool lifecycle analysis based on AAS, Procedia CIRP 130 (2024) 1562–1568.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.283

Google Scholar

[23] F. Kaya, E. Şanlı, Ö. Albayrak, P. Ünal, P. Kirci, Asset Administration Shell Tool Comparison: A Case Study with Real Digital Twins Used in Petrochemical Industry, Sensors (Basel) 25 (2025).

DOI: 10.3390/s25071978

Google Scholar

[24] A. Mazur, H. Peters, A. Artelt, L. Koller, C. Hartmann, A. Trächtler, B. Hammer, Studying the Generalization Behavior of Surrogate Models for Punch-Bending by Generating Plausible Counterfactuals, in: W. Senn, M. Sanguineti, A. Saudargiene, I.V. Tetko, A.E.P. Villa, V. Jirsa, Y. Bengio (Eds.), Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2025, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025, p.192–203.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-04555-3_16

Google Scholar

[25] H. Wang, abqpy 2025: Type hints for Abaqus/Python scripting, 2025. https://github.com/haiiliin/abqpy (accessed 16 January 2026).

Google Scholar

[26] Industrial Digital Twin Association, IDTA 02008-1-1 Time Series Data (2023). https://github.com/admin-shell-io/submodel-templates/blob/main/published/Time%20Series%20Data/1/1/IDTA%2002008-1-1_Submodel_TimeSeriesData.pdf.

DOI: 10.62628/idta.02006-3-0

Google Scholar