Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to the Identification of CPB06 Yield Criterion Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, a new methodology for the identification of the CPB06 yield criterion parameters is presented. This methodology is based on the application of Machine Learning models and the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm. The proposed methodology relies on data obtained from a biaxial tensile test with a cruciform specimen and aims to overcome some of the challenges usually faced during material characterization with the CPB06 yield criterion. The predictive performances achieved were positive overall, when comparing the yield surfaces obtained for testing cases, highlighting the potential of the proposed methodology.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

89-98

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Marques AE, Parreira TG, Pereira AFG, et al (2025) Machine learning application to the identification of sheet metal constitutive model parameters. Machine Learning for Computational Science and Engineering 1:.

DOI: 10.1007/s44379-024-00006-8

Google Scholar

[2] Yoshida F, Hamasaki H, Uemori T (2013) A user-friendly 3D yield function to describe anisotropy of steel sheets. International Journal of Plasticity 45:119–139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.010

Google Scholar

[3] Guo Z, Bai R, Lei Z, et al (2021) CPINet: Parameter identification of path-dependent constitutive model with automatic denoising based on CNN-LSTM. European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids 90:104327.

DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104327

Google Scholar

[4] Prates PA, Pereira AFG, Sakharova NA, et al (2016) Inverse Strategies for Identifying the Parameters of Constitutive Laws of Metal Sheets. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2016:.

DOI: 10.1155/2016/4152963

Google Scholar

[5] Morand L, Helm D (2019) A mixture of experts approach to handle ambiguities in parameter identification problems in material modeling. Computational Materials Science 167:85–91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.003

Google Scholar

[6] Cazacu O, Plunkett B, Barlat F (2006) Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals. International Journal of Plasticity 22:1171–1194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.06.001

Google Scholar

[7] Marques AE, Parreira TG, Pereira AFG, et al (2024) Machine learning applications in sheet metal constitutive Modelling : A review. International Journal of Solids and Structures 303:.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.113024

Google Scholar

[8] Prates PA, Oliveira MC, Fernandes J V. (2014) A new strategy for the simultaneous identification of constitutive laws parameters of metal sheets using a single test. Computational Materials Science 85:102–120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.043

Google Scholar

[9] Menezes LF, Teodosiu C (2000) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of the deep-drawing process using solid finite elements. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 97:100–106.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00345-3

Google Scholar

[10] Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2008) Algorithms and strategies for treatment of large deformation frictional contact in the numerical simulation of deep drawing process. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 15:113–162.

DOI: 10.1007/s11831-008-9018-x

Google Scholar

[11] Neto DM, Oliveira MC, Menezes LF (2017) Surface Smoothing Procedures in Computational Contact Mechanics. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 24:37–87.

DOI: 10.1007/s11831-015-9159-7

Google Scholar

[12] Swift HW (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1:1–18.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1

Google Scholar

[13] Jang DP, Fazily P, Yoon JW (2021) Machine learning-based constitutive model for J2- plasticity. International Journal of Plasticity 138:102919.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102919

Google Scholar

[14] Zhou ZH (2018) A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. National Science Review 5:44–53.

DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwx106

Google Scholar

[15] Murtagh F (1991) Multilayer perceptrons for classification and regression. Neurocomputing 2:183–197.

DOI: 10.1016/0925-2312(91)90023-5

Google Scholar

[16] Dreyfus SE (1990) Artificial Neural Networks, Back Propagation, and the Kelley-Bryson Gradient Procedure. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 13:926–928.

DOI: 10.2514/3.25422

Google Scholar

[17] Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al (2012) Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12:2825–2830.

Google Scholar

[18] Pandey A, Jain A (2017) Comparative Analysis of KNN Algorithm using Various Normalization Techniques. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security 9:36–42.

DOI: 10.5815/ijcnis.2017.11.04

Google Scholar

[19] Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, et al (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets - Part 1: Theory. International Journal of Plasticity 19:1297–1319.

DOI: 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0

Google Scholar