Optimization of Surgical Drill Margin Dimension to Reduce Bone Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

Excessive heat generation during bone drilling is a leading cause of thermal osteonecrosis—a serious risk in medical departments. Despite extensive drill design research, the influence of margin geometry remains underexplored. This study presents finite element modeling and statistical optimization to evaluate and optimize drill margin geometry—specifically margin width (Mw) and height (Mh)—to reduce bone temperature rise during surgery. A thermo-mechanical finite element model was developed in DEFORM-3D to simulate cortical bone drilling using drill bits with varied margin dimensions. The models were validated experimentally using bovine cortical bone, with an average temperature prediction errors of 2.4–8.0%. The maximum bone temperature (Tmax) was selected as the objective function. A central composite design (CCD) was applied to generate experimental runs, followed by response surface methodology (RSM) and desirability-based optimization. The second-order effect of Mw contributed 47.2% to Tmax. The optimal Mh (0.05 mm) and Mw (0.22 mm)—with a desirability value of 0.985—could reduce Tmax below the osteonecrosis level with only a 44.8 °C temperature rise. This study demonstrates a novel computational approach for optimizing surgical drill margins—a previously underutilized parameter. The findings may support future developments in drill bit customization and robotic surgery systems to minimize thermal injury to bone cells.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

27-37

Citation:

Online since:

May 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.F.A. Akhbar, A.W. Sulong,Surgical drill bit design and thermomechanical damage in bone drilling: a review, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 49 (2021) 29–56.

DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02600-2

Google Scholar

[2] K. Alam, R. Muhammad, V. V. Silberschmidt,In Vitro Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Forces in Plane Cutting of Cortical Bone, Appl. Mech. Mater. 799–800 (2015) 509–514.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.799-800.509

Google Scholar

[3] E.I.O. Pesqueira, C.S. Mucsi, J.L. Rossi,Influence of the Geometric Characteristics of the Mini-Implants on Mechanicals Properties Using Artificial Bone Similar to Anterior, Middle and Posterior Regions of the Jaws, Mater. Sci. Forum. 930 (2018) 276–282.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.930.276

Google Scholar

[4] A.A. Iliescu, C.M. Petcu, R. Mercuţ, M.G. Iliescu, I.C. Petcu, I.M. Gheorghiu, T. Ţârcă, P. Perlea,Thermal Changes of Bone Induced during Drilling for Dental Implants Placement: An In Vitro Study, Defect Diffus. Forum. 376 (2017) 78–88.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.376.78

Google Scholar

[5] M.F.A. Akhbar, A.R. Yusoff,Fast & Injurious: Reducing thermal osteonecrosis regions in the drilling of human bone with multi-objective optimization, Measurement. 152 (2020) 107385.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107385

Google Scholar

[6] R. Zakrasas, V. Jurenas, J. Baskutienė,Analysis of Compact Bone Vibration Assisted Drilling, Solid State Phenom. 251 (2016) 183–187.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.251.183

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Kitahama, H. Shizuka, Y. Nakano, Y. Ohara, J. Muto, S. Tsuchida, D. Motoyama, H. Miyake, K. Sakai,Advancements and Challenges in Robot-Assisted Bone Processing in Neurosurgical Procedures, Neurospine. 21 (2024) 97–103.

DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347164.582

Google Scholar

[8] M. (Matin) Einafshar, M. Rajaeirad, A. Babazadeh Ghazijahani, M. Skipper Andersen,On the importance of precision in cortical bone drilling: Integrating experimental validation and computational modeling, J. Orthop. 56 (2024) 70–76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.05.016

Google Scholar

[9] Ö. Pazarcı, F. Gündoğdu,Temperature change during orthopedic drilling procedures: An experimental surgical internal fixation simulation study, J. Orthop. 46 (2023) 58–63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.013

Google Scholar

[10] E.A. Schofield, S.L. Reiss, A.E. Rey, R. Kinney, S.-E. Song,Tool parameters to minimize temperature changes in bone drilling, Injury. 54 (2023) 904–909.

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.01.018

Google Scholar

[11] M.F.A. Akhbar, A.R. Yusoff,Multi-objective optimization of surgical drill bit to minimize thermal damage in bone-drilling, Appl. Therm. Eng. 157 (2019) 113594.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.04.004

Google Scholar

[12] J. Soriano, A. Garay, P. Aristimuño, L.M. Iriarte, J.A. Eguren, P.J. Arrazola,Effects of rotational speed, feed rate and tool type on temperatures and cutting forces when drilling bovine cortical bone, Mach. Sci. Technol. 17 (2013) 611–636.

DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2013.837353

Google Scholar

[13] J. Soriano, A. Garay, P. Aristimuño, P.J. Arrazola,Study and improvement of surgical drill bit geometry for implant site preparation, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 74 (2014) 615–627.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-5998-x

Google Scholar

[14] G.M. Treece, A.H. Gee, P.M. Mayhew, K.E.S. Poole,High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data., Med. Image Anal. 14 (2010) 276–90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.01.003

Google Scholar

[15] S.R. Davidson, D.F. James,Measurement of thermal conductivity of bovine cortical bone., Med. Eng. Phys. 22 (2000) 741–7.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Gholampour, H.H. Hassanalideh, M. Gholampour, D. Frim,Thermal and physical damage in skull base drilling using gas cooling modes: FEM simulation and experimental evaluation, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 212 (2021) 106463.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106463

Google Scholar

[17] Melnis, Knets,Effect of the rate of deformation on the mechanical properties of compact bone tissue, Mech Compos Mater. 18 (1982) 358–63.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00604319

Google Scholar

[18] M.F.A. Akhbar,Thermomechanical damage in cortical bone caused by margins of surgical drill bit: A finite element analysis, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 231 (2023) 107361.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107361

Google Scholar

[19] A. Mellal, H.W.A. Wiskott, J. Botsis, S.S. Scherrer, U.C. Belser,Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data, Clin. Oral Implants Res. 15 (2004) 239–248.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01000.x

Google Scholar

[20] S.S. Kohles,Applications of an anisotropic parameter to cortical bone, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 11 (2000) 261–265.

Google Scholar

[21] R. Huiskes,Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement: Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures, Acta Orthop. Scand. 51 (1980) 3–208.

DOI: 10.3109/ort.1980.51.suppl-185.01

Google Scholar

[22] DEFORM 3D Version 11.0, User's Manual, Version 11, Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation, 2545 Farmers Drive, Suite 200 Columbus, Ohio., 2014.

Google Scholar

[23] M.F. Ali Akhbar, A.R. Yusoff,Drilling of bone: Effect of drill bit geometries on thermal osteonecrosis risk regions, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 233 (2019) 207–218.

DOI: 10.1177/0954411918819113

Google Scholar

[24] M.F.A. Akhbar, M. Malik, A.R. Yusoff,Effects of drilling parameters in numerical simulation to the bone temperature elevation, in: AIP Conf. Proc., 2018: p.020002.

DOI: 10.1063/1.5030881

Google Scholar

[25] M.F. Ali Akhbar, A.R. Yusoff,Comparison of bone temperature elevation in drilling of human, bovine and porcine bone, Procedia CIRP. 82 (2019) 411–414.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.220

Google Scholar

[26] M.F. Ali Akhbar, M.F. Mohd Ashri, A.R. Yusoff, S. Jamaludin, R. Alias, F. Alias, R. Hassan, M. Rizwan,Optimization of Drill Bit Geometries for Minimum Thermal Damage in Bone Drilling, J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 122 (2024) 22–37.

DOI: 10.37934/arfmts.122.2.2237

Google Scholar