Paper Titles
Vibration-Based Non-Destructive Inspection Method for Detecting Manufacturing Defects in Drill Bits
p.39
Optimization of Micro-Drilling Parameters for Acoustic Panel Materials Using Taguchi Method
p.45
Susceptibility of 5% Nickel Steel to Stress Corrosion Cracking in Liquid Ammonia
p.59
Performance Evaluation of Magnesia – Chromite Refractory in the Flash Smelting Furnace of a Copper Smelting Industrial Area
p.65
Study on Dominant Roles of Damage Mechanisms of Iron Target during Single-Particle Impingement under Varying Low Impact Angles
p.73
A Novel Graphene-Enhanced Phase Change Material Based Composite Aggregate for Energy Storage Concrete Applications
p.83
Low-Temperature Firing of Clay Tiles Incorporating Waste Glass, Sediment Soil, Volcanic Soil and Local Illite Clay
p.91
Eco-Friendly Non-Fired Tiles by Utilizing Waste Glass and Limestone Dust
p.101
Preliminary Study on CO2 Sequestration in High-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Cement via Direct Air CO2 Capture
p.111

Study on Dominant Roles of Damage Mechanisms of Iron Target during Single-Particle Impingement under Varying Low Impact Angles

Article Preview

Abstract:

For the single-particle erosion of an iron target under low impact angles, normal impact mechanism and tangential cutting mechanism operate through a synergistic interaction yet also compete with each other, each demonstrating distinct emphases. Their relative roles under varying low-incidence angles are worth studying. In this paper, physical experiments of single-particle erosion are conducted on an iron target by impingement of an Al2O3 particle at an impact velocity of 120 m/s and impact angles of 30, 20 and 10 degrees. Results show that tangential cutting dominates the penetration stage for three degree cases. However, normal impact also plays a relatively important role during the penetration stage at 30º. Normal impact dominates the critical stage between penetration and rebound for all three low incident angles, but its influence is weaker at 20º and 10º compared to 30º. Normal impact dominates the rebound stage at 30º, while tangential cutting dominates the rebound stage at both 20º and 10º. Additionally, the influence of normal impact is more pronounced at 20º than at 10º during the rebound stage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Sustainable and Energy Materials, Engineering Materials and their Characteristics View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 1053)

Pages:

73-79

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-BEF3qy

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2026

Authors:

Zi Qiang Fang*, Le Li, Yu Hang Liu, Zhou Li Jin

Keywords:

Iron Target, Mechanical Testing, Normal Impact, Single-Particle Erosion, Tangential Cutting

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] S. Q. Yang, J. C. Fan, M. T. Liu, D. N. Li, J. L. Li, L. H. Han, J. J. Wang, S. Y. Yang, S. W. Dai, L. B. Zhang, Research on the solid particle erosion wear of pipe steel for hydraulic fracturing based on experiments and numerical simulations, Petrol. Sci. 21 (2024) 2779 - 2792.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2024.03.019

Google Scholar

[2] M. Bembenek, J. Krawczyk, K. Pancikiewicz, The wear mechanism of mill beaters for coal grinding made-up from high manganese cast steel, Eng. Fail. Anal. 142 (2022) 106843.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106843

Google Scholar

[3] R. Zhang, K. Xu, Y. Liu, H. Liu, A general numerical method for solid particle erosion in gas– liquid two-phase flow pipelines, Ocean Eng. 267 (2023) 113305.

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113305

Google Scholar

[4] S. M. Pathak, V. P. Kumar, V. Bonu, Solid particle erosion studies of ceramic oxides reinforced water-based PU nanocomposite coatings for wind turbine blade protection, Ceram. Int. 48 (2022) 35788-35798.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.143

Google Scholar

[5] B. Liu, J. X. Qu, S. M. Hao, Failure Analysis Of ZGMN13 Fan Blade In Coal Crashers, Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part A: Physical Testing. 38 (2002) 521-524.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lindroos, V. Ratia, M. Apostol, K. Valtonen, A. Laukkanen, W. Molnar, K. Holmberg, V. Kuokkala, The effect of impact conditions on the wear and deformation behavior of wear resistant steels, Wear. 328-329 (2015) 197-205.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.032

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Ben-Ami, A. Uzi, A. Levy, Modelling the particles impingement angle to produce maximum erosion, Powder Technol. 301 (2016) 1032-1043.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.07.041

Google Scholar

[8] M. Rameshk, M. Soltanieh, S. M. Masoudpanah, Effects of flow velocity and impact angle on erosion-corrosion of an API-5 L X65 steel coated by plasma nitriding of hard chromium underlayer, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 (2020) 10054-10061.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.013

Google Scholar

[9] R. Salzbrenner, Fracture toughness behavior of ferritic ductile cast iron, J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) 2135-2147.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01132950

Google Scholar

[10] Z. Q. Fang, S. L. Peng, L. Zhang, A Test System for Plastic Metal Materials Subjected to Multi-Particle Erosion via Air Ejector, Defect and Diffusion Forum. 419 (2022) 97-102.

DOI: 10.4028/p-4w8lu2

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Q. Fang, Y. Liu, H. Huang, L. Li, Z. L. Jin, Physical Experiments and DEM Simulations for Erosion of Iron Target by Two Impingements of Al2O3 Particle with Impingement Angles of Double 90°, The 11th International Conference on Applied Materials and Manufacturing Technology, 2025, in Press.

Google Scholar