Preliminary Study on CO2 Sequestration in High-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Cement via Direct Air CO2 Capture

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates CO₂ sequestration in high-calcium fly ash (HCFA) geopolymer cement through combined heat and CO₂ curing. Class C fly ash from the lignite-fired power plant was activated with 10 M NaOH (L/B = 0.40). Two curing regimes were applied: heat curing at 60 °C for 24 h (Typical GP) and heat curing followed by CO₂ curing at 15 % v/v for 24 h (CO₂ Curing GP). CO₂ curing increased the average compressive strength by 7.16 %, from 15.75 to 16.87 MPa. Phenolphthalein testing revealed a ~4.3-fold increase in carbonation area and a greater average penetration depth, from 1.9 to 7.9 mm, compared with the control. XRD confirmed calcite as the main carbonation product, along with hematite, magnetite, sodium sulfate, and ye’elimite. This work represents an initial step toward applying industrial CO₂-rich gas for geopolymer curing in Thailand, offering dual benefits of improved mechanical performance and significant CO₂ capture potential for sustainable construction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

111-116

Citation:

Online since:

May 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E.F. Oteng-Abayie, F.A. Asaki, E. Duodu, S. Mahawiya and B.A. Gyamfi: Heliyon Vol. 10(7) (2024), e28212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28212

Google Scholar

[2] L.K. Turner and F.G. Collins: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 43 (2013), p.125–130.

Google Scholar

[3] B.C. McLellan, R.P. Williams, J. Lay, A. Van Riessen and G.D. Corder: J. Clean. Prod. Vol. 19(9–10) (2011), p.1080–1090.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ramjan, W. Tangchirapat, C. Jaturapitakkul, C. Chee Ban, P. Jitsangiam and T. Suwan: Materials Vol. 14(6) (2021), p.1528.

DOI: 10.3390/ma14061528

Google Scholar

[5] T. Suwan, B. Paphawasit, M. Fan, P. Jitsangiam and P. Chindaprasirt: Mater. Manuf. Process. Vol. 36(9) (2021), p.1040–1048.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Dziejarski, R. Krzyżyńska and K. Andersson: Fuel Vol. 342 (2023), article 127964.

Google Scholar

[7] A.L. Freire, H.J. José and R.d.F.P.M. Moreira: Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control Vol. 118 (2022), article 103684.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Enayat Zadeh, A. Arjomand, T. Tynjälä and E. Inkeri: Energy Vol. 304 (2024), article 132603.

Google Scholar

[9] W.F. Cossio Guzman, C. Di Pietro, M. Minelli, V. Medri, D. Frascari, D. Pinelli, E. Papa, E. Landi and F. Miccio: Chem. Eng. Trans. Vol. 117 (2025), p.919–924.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.117098

Google Scholar

[10] S.S. Hossain and F. Akhtar: J. CO₂ Util. Vol. 78 (2023), article 102631.

Google Scholar