Evaluation of Periacetabular Bone Reaction after Total Hip Arthroplasty with Alumina-Alumina Pairing Using Computed Tomography

Abstract:

Article Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 240-242)

Main Theme:

Edited by:

Besim Ben-Nissan, Doron Sher, William Walsh

Pages:

863-866

Citation:

L. Müller et al., "Evaluation of Periacetabular Bone Reaction after Total Hip Arthroplasty with Alumina-Alumina Pairing Using Computed Tomography", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 240-242, pp. 863-866, 2003

Online since:

May 2003

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Oh I, Harris WH. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (1978); 1: pp.75-85.

[2] Kroger H, Venesmaa P, Jurvelin J, Miettinen H, Suomalainen O, Alhava E. Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. (1998); 352: pp.66-74.

[3] Kalender WA. Computed Tomography. Fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. New York: Wiley & Sons (2000).

[4] Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA. Determination of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. (1992); 6: pp.836-44.

[5] Huiskes R. Finite element analysis of acetabular reconstruction. Noncemented threaded cups. Acta Orthop Scand (1987); 6: pp.620-5.

[6] Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop. (1992); 274: pp.124-34.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.