Finite Element Analyses for Thickness Effects on J-Integral Testing using Non-Standard Testing Specimens

Abstract:

Article Preview

This paper compiles solutions of plastic η factors for standard and non-standard fracture toughness testing specimens, via detailed three-dimensional (3-D) finite element (FE) analyses. Fracture toughness testing specimens include a middle cracked tension (M(T)) specimen, SE(B), single-edge cracked bar in tension (SE(T)) and C(T) specimen. The ligament-to-thickness ratio of the specimen is systematically varied. It is found that the use of the CMOD overall provides more robust experimental estimation than that of the LLD, for all cases considered in the present work. Moreover, the estimation based on the load- CMOD record is shown to be insensitive to the specimen thickness, and thus can be used for testing a specimen with any thickness.

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Edited by:

Kikuo Kishimoto, Masanori Kikuchi, Tetsuo Shoji and Masumi Saka

Pages:

693-698

Citation:

J.S. Kim et al., "Finite Element Analyses for Thickness Effects on J-Integral Testing using Non-Standard Testing Specimens", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 261-263, pp. 693-698, 2004

Online since:

April 2004

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] ASTM Standard, E 1820-96. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 3, Vol. 03. 01, 1996. pp.981-1013.

[2] British Standard BS 7448-1991. Fracture mechanics toughness tests. British Standards Institution, London., (1991).

[3] Hellmann D. Schwalbe K-H. Geometry and size effects on J-R and �-R curves under plane stress conditions. In: Fracture Mechanics: 15 th Symposium. ASTM STP 833. Ed. Sanford R J. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1984, pp.577-605.

[4] Hancock J W. Reuter W G. Parks D M. Constraint and toughness parameterised by T. In: Hackett E M, Schwalbe K-H, Dodds R-H, editors. Constraint Effect in Fracture, ASTM STP 1171, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1993. pp.21-40.

[5] Joyce JA. Hackett EM. Roe C. Effects of crack depth and mode of loading on the J-R curve behaviour of a high-strength steel. In: Hackett E M, Schwalbe K-H, Dodds R-H, editors. Constraint Effect in Fracture, ASTM STP 1171, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1993. pp.239-263.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/stp18031s

[6] Kirk MT. Dodds RH. J and CTOD estimation equations for shallow cracks in single edge notch bend specimens. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 1993; 21: 228-238.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/jte11948j

[7] Wang Y-Y. Gordon J R. The limits of applicability of J and CTOD estimation procedures for shallowcracked SENB specimens. In: Dawes M G, editor. Shallow Crack Fracture Mechanics, Toughness Test and Applications, Cambridge, U.K. (1992).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093226.3.176

[8] Kim Y-J. Schwalbe K-H. On the sensitivity of J estimation to materials’ stress strain curves in fracture toughness testing using the finite element method. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 2001; 29(1): 18-30.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/jte12387j

[9] Nevalainen M. Dodds RH. Numerical investigation of 3-D constraint effects in brittle fracture in SE(B) and C(T) specimens. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6317, (2001).

[10] Kim YJ. Budden PJ. Plastic � factors of homogeneous and bi-material SE(T) specimens for toughness and creep crack growth testing. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures. 2001; 24(11): 751-760.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00436.x

[11] ABAQUS Standard/User’s Manual, Version 5. 8. Hibbit. Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc, Pawtucket, RI, USA, (1998).

[12] Tada H. Paris P. Irwin G. The stress analysis of cracks handbook. Paris Production Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, (1985).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.