Finite Element Analysis of Rubber Particles Size Distribution on Fracture Toughness of Rubber-Modified Polymer

Abstract:

Article Preview

A numerical study on the effects of the distribution of rubber particles size on the fracture toughness of rubber-modified polymer alloys was computed. FEM analyses were conducted on the deformation field near the crack tip under mode I for small scale yielding condition. Near the crack tip is modelled as composite of matrix materials and rubber particles. On the other hand, outer region is modelled as homogeneous material whose constitutive equation has been obtained by analysing unit cell model of matrix and rubber particle. Perfect bonding or partial debonding of the interface is assumed in the computation. Matrix and rubber particles are treated as Mises and Mooney-Rivlin materials, respectively. It is shown that energy flux into fracture process zone; Ĵ -integral is smaller for bimodal type than monomodal one. This behavior largely occurred on the partial debonding case. These results imply that the screening effects occurred in the bimodal type larger than monomodal one.

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Edited by:

Kikuo Kishimoto, Masanori Kikuchi, Tetsuo Shoji and Masumi Saka

Pages:

711-716

Citation:

Husaini et al., "Finite Element Analysis of Rubber Particles Size Distribution on Fracture Toughness of Rubber-Modified Polymer", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 261-263, pp. 711-716, 2004

Online since:

April 2004

Export:

Price:

$41.00

[1] T. L, Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamental and Applications, CRC Press, Florida (1991).

[2] Husaini, M. Notomi, K. Kishimoto, and T. Shibuya, Materials Science Research International, (1997), 3 (1997) p.158.

[3] S. J., Shaw, In Rubber Toughened Engineering Plastics, A. A. Collyer, Ed., Chapman & Hall, London (1994).

[4] A. M. Donald, and E. J. Kramer, J. Material Science, 17 (1982) p.1765.

[5] A. J. Kinloch, and F. J. Guild, In Toughened Plastic II, C. K. Riew and A. J. Kinloch, Ed., Advances in Chemistry Series 252; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC (1996).

[6] R. A. Hall, and I. Burnstein, In Toughened Plastic II, C. K. Riew and A. J. Kinloch, Ed., Advances in Chemistry Series 252; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC (1996).

[7] Y. Okamoto, H. Miyagi, M. Kakugo, and K. Takahashi, Macromolecules, 24 (1991) p.5639.

[8] X. H. Chen, and W. Mai, Key Engineering Materials, 145-149 (1998) p.233.

[9] K. Kishimoto, M. Notomi, and T. Koizumi, Book of Abstracts, 7 th Int. Conf. on Mech. Behavior of Materials, The Netherlands Congress Center, The Hague, The Netherlands (1995) p.475.

[10] H. Finney, and A. Kumar, Rubber Chemistry and Techn., 61 (1988) p.879.

[11] J. R. Rice, Transaction ASME, Ser. E., J. Applied Mechanics, 35 (1968) p.379.

[12] K. Kishimoto, S. Aoki, and M. Sakata, Eng. Fracture Mechanics, 13 (1980) p.841.

[13] S. Aoki, K. Kishimoto, and M. Sakata, J. App. Mech., Trans. ASME, Series E, 48 (1981) p.428.