Finite Element Analysis of Rubber Particles Size Distribution on Fracture Toughness of Rubber-Modified Polymer

Article Preview

Abstract:

A numerical study on the effects of the distribution of rubber particles size on the fracture toughness of rubber-modified polymer alloys was computed. FEM analyses were conducted on the deformation field near the crack tip under mode I for small scale yielding condition. Near the crack tip is modelled as composite of matrix materials and rubber particles. On the other hand, outer region is modelled as homogeneous material whose constitutive equation has been obtained by analysing unit cell model of matrix and rubber particle. Perfect bonding or partial debonding of the interface is assumed in the computation. Matrix and rubber particles are treated as Mises and Mooney-Rivlin materials, respectively. It is shown that energy flux into fracture process zone; Ĵ -integral is smaller for bimodal type than monomodal one. This behavior largely occurred on the partial debonding case. These results imply that the screening effects occurred in the bimodal type larger than monomodal one.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Pages:

711-716

Citation:

Online since:

April 2004

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. L, Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamental and Applications, CRC Press, Florida (1991).

Google Scholar

[2] Husaini, M. Notomi, K. Kishimoto, and T. Shibuya, Materials Science Research International, (1997), 3 (1997) p.158.

Google Scholar

[3] S. J., Shaw, In Rubber Toughened Engineering Plastics, A. A. Collyer, Ed., Chapman & Hall, London (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] A. M. Donald, and E. J. Kramer, J. Material Science, 17 (1982) p.1765.

Google Scholar

[5] A. J. Kinloch, and F. J. Guild, In Toughened Plastic II, C. K. Riew and A. J. Kinloch, Ed., Advances in Chemistry Series 252; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC (1996).

Google Scholar

[6] R. A. Hall, and I. Burnstein, In Toughened Plastic II, C. K. Riew and A. J. Kinloch, Ed., Advances in Chemistry Series 252; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC (1996).

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Okamoto, H. Miyagi, M. Kakugo, and K. Takahashi, Macromolecules, 24 (1991) p.5639.

Google Scholar

[8] X. H. Chen, and W. Mai, Key Engineering Materials, 145-149 (1998) p.233.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Kishimoto, M. Notomi, and T. Koizumi, Book of Abstracts, 7 th Int. Conf. on Mech. Behavior of Materials, The Netherlands Congress Center, The Hague, The Netherlands (1995) p.475.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Finney, and A. Kumar, Rubber Chemistry and Techn., 61 (1988) p.879.

Google Scholar

[11] J. R. Rice, Transaction ASME, Ser. E., J. Applied Mechanics, 35 (1968) p.379.

Google Scholar

[12] K. Kishimoto, S. Aoki, and M. Sakata, Eng. Fracture Mechanics, 13 (1980) p.841.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Aoki, K. Kishimoto, and M. Sakata, J. App. Mech., Trans. ASME, Series E, 48 (1981) p.428.

Google Scholar