Frequency-Demodulated Analysis Based on Cyclostationarity for Local Fault Detection in Gears

Article Preview

Abstract:

The demodulation analysis has been extensively used for gear diagnosis. However these techniques mainly deal with the amplitude-modulated signal instead of the frequency-modulated signal. Due to the symmetrical phase relationship of the sidebands, the amplitude-demodulated methods are not suitable for the frequency-modulated signal. This paper introduces the theory of cyclostationary processes as a powerful frequency-demodulation tool for the diagnosis of gears. The Cyclic Autocorrelation Function (CAF) is an important second-order cyclic statistics and acts as an efficient parameter to the frequency-demodulated analysis. In this paper, the CAF of frequency-modulated signal is deduced carefully. Through the discussion of frequency feature of the CAF slice at different cyclic frequency, two useful conclusions have been arrived about the frequency-demodulation. Firstly, the CAF slice at even multiples of the modulator-frequency can demodulate the frequency-modulated signal directly. Secondly, the amplitude-demodulated methods are suitable for the CAF slice of frequency-modulated signal at some special cyclic frequencies, which are equal to odd multiples of the modulator-frequency or close to the double carrier-frequency. These features of the CAF slice mentioned above overcome the invalidation of amplitude-demodulated methods for the frequency-modulated signal and increase it’s application range in engineering. Application in simulated and experimental data from a gear rig verifies the effectiveness of the frequency-demodulated method based on cyclostationarity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 293-294)

Pages:

87-94

Citation:

Online since:

September 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N.A. TanDon and A.B. Choudhury: Tribology International Vol. 32 (1999), p.469.

Google Scholar

[2] C. Capdessus, M. Sidahmed and J.L. Lacoume: Mechanical System and Signal Processing Vol. 14 (2000), p.371.

DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1999.1260

Google Scholar

[3] J. Antoni, F. Bonnardot, A. Raad and M.E. Badaoui: Mechanical System and Signal Processing Vol. 18 (2004), p.1285.

DOI: 10.1016/s0888-3270(03)00088-8

Google Scholar

[4] Z.K. Zhu, Z.H. Feng and F.R. Kong: Mechanical System and Signal Processing Vol. 19 (2005), p.467.

Google Scholar

[5] A.C. McCormick and A.K. Nandi: Mechanical System and Signal Processing Vol. 12 (1998), p.225.

Google Scholar

[6] W.A. Gardner and C.M. Spooner: IEEE Trans on signal processing Vol. 42 (1994), p.3387.

Google Scholar

[7] C.M. Spooner and W.A. Gardner: IEEE Trans on signal processing Vol. 42 (1994), p.3409.

Google Scholar