Determination of the Key Microstructural Parameter for the Cleavage Fracture Toughness of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels in the Transition Region

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of the microstructural parameters, such as the prior austenite grain size and carbide size, on the cleavage fracture toughness were investigated in the transition region of Mn-Mo-Ni bainitic low alloy steels. Cleavage fracture toughness was evaluated by the ASTM standard E 1921 Master curve method. In order to clarify the effects of each microstructure, the grain size and carbide size of the test materials were independently controlled by modifying the heat treatment process. Firstly, the grain sizes were changed from 25㎛ to 110㎛ without any significant changes in the carbide size and shape. Secondly, the average carbide sizes were changed from 0.20 ㎛ to 0.29㎛ but maintaining the initial grain sizes. As a result, the fracture toughness in the transition region did not show any significant dependency on the austenite grain size, while the carbide size showed a close relation to the fracture toughness. Fracture toughness was decreased with an increase of the average carbide size. From the microscopic observation of the fractured surface, the cleavage initiation distance (CID) from the original crack tip showed no direct relationship to the prior austenite grain sizes but a strong relationship to the carbide sizes. However, the measured cleavage fracture toughness was strongly related to the distance from the crack tip to the cleavage initiation site. From the viewpoint of the weakest link theory, the particle size and their distribution in front of the crack tip is probably more important than the grain size in the transition temperature range where the fracture was controlled by the cleavage crack initiation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 297-300)

Pages:

1672-1677

Citation:

Online since:

November 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Malkin and A.S. Tetelman: Eng. Frac. Mech. Vol. 3 (1971), p.131.

Google Scholar

[2] J.F. Knott: J. Iron Steel Inst. Vol. 204 (1968), p.104.

Google Scholar

[3] G.Z. Wang and J.H. Chen: Metall. and Mat. Trans A Vol. 27A (1996), p. (1909).

Google Scholar

[4] R.O. Ritchie, B. Francis and W.L. Server: Metall. Trans. A Vol. 7A (1976), p.831.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Bowen, S.G. Druce and J.F. Knott: Acta Metall. Vol. 34 (1986), p.1121.

Google Scholar

[6] D.M. Parks: J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Vol. 98 (1976), p.30.

Google Scholar

[7] D. A Curry and J.F. Knott: Met. Sci. Vol. 10 (1976), p.1.

Google Scholar

[8] J.H. Chen, S.H. Hu and G.Z. Wang: Metall. and Mat. Trans A Vol. 32A (2001), p.1081.

Google Scholar

[9] N. Okumurra: Met. Sci. Vol. 17 (1983), p.581.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Brozzo, G. Buzzichelli, A. Mascanzoni and M. Mirabile: Metal. Sci. Vol. 11(1977), p.123.

DOI: 10.1179/msc.1977.11.4.123

Google Scholar

[11] M.J. Roberts: Metall. Trans. Vol. 1A (1970), p.3287.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Bowen, S.G. Druce and J.F. Knott: Acta Metall. Vol. 35 (1987), p.1735.

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM standard E1921-03.

Google Scholar

[14] W.J. Yang, B.S. Lee, M.Y. Huh and J.H. Hong: J. Nuclear Mater. Vol. 317 (2003), p.234.

Google Scholar

[15] R.O. Richie, J.F. Knott and J.R. Rice: J. Mech. Phys. Solids Vol. 21 (1973).

Google Scholar