Automotive Component Fatigue Life Estimation by Frequency Domain Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

Time domain approach with S-N approach and local strain approach were used for fatigue life estimation. But these days, using PSD (Power Spectral Density) method is highlighted, because of short amount of time in measurement and analysis. Especially, PSD method is useful for analysis of fatigue failure which is caused by vibration damage, also FRF (Frequency Response Function) is useful for efficient prediction of fatigue life when the same product is employing different motor vehicle or test condition. In order to estimate fatigue life of compressor for air conditioning, time domain analysis and frequency domain analysis were performed and the results were compared. As a result, results of analysis in frequency domain and time domain were similar. With this, there is recognition of decreasing the period of measuring and analysis in PSD analysis. Moreover, in case of FRF pursued of a part, using FRF is applicable at fatigue life prediction in different testing condition. There was investigated an analysis method with curtailed analysis period by FRF.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 297-300)

Pages:

1776-1783

Citation:

Online since:

November 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.H. Jung: The Study of Signal Analysis and Editing For Component Durability Test (KSAE, 1999).

Google Scholar

[2] N.W.M. Bishop And F. Sherratt: Fatigue Life predition from power spectral density data, Environmental Engineering 2 (1989).

Google Scholar

[3] Jhon Dropper: FATIGUE ANALYSIS, (1992), p.3. 1-3. 36, 10. 1-10. 12.

Google Scholar

[4] nCode FATIMAS-EDIT Manual, Sheffield: nCode Intrenational Ltd. (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] De-Guang Shang: Effect of fatigue damage on the dynamic response frequency of spot-welded joints, International Journal of Fatigue 25 (2003), pp.311-316.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00140-8

Google Scholar