Influence of Specimen Configuration and TIG Welding on Fracture Toughness of RAFs (JLF-1)

Abstract:

In order to apply a reduced activation ferritic (JLF-1) steel to the blanket/first-wall structure of a fusion reactor, its fracture toughness is very important for the strict estimation of material life. Fracture toughness testing of irradiated materials requires the use of miniaturised specimens and evaluation of TIG welding (tungsten inert gas arc welding) weldment properties is an important issue because necessary for production of nuclear fusion reactors. In this study, the fracture toughness tests were carried out according to the ASTM E1820-99. It was performed on various sizes (ligament and thickness) and various side-grooves of specimens and the TIG welding joint of JLF-1. The test results showed the standard specimen with side-groove of 40% represented valid fracture toughness. Fracture resistance curve (R-curve) increased with increasing specimen ligament and decreased with increasing specimen thickness. However, the R-curve of half size specimen was similar to that of the standard (1inch thickness) specimen. The fracture toughness test results of the TIG welded specimen showed a slight increase in the TIG welded specimen compared with JLF-1 base metal specimen.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 297-300)
• Pages: 788-793
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.788
• Online since: November 2005
• Authors: Han Ki Yoon, Dong Hyun Kim, Won Jo Park, Akira Kohyama
• Keywords: Fracture Toughness, R-Curve, Reduced Activation Ferritic Steel RAFs, Side Groove Effects, Specimen Size Effects, Tungsten Inert Gas Arc TIG Welding

References

[1] A. Hishinuma, A. Kohyama, R.L. Kludo, D.S. Gelles, W. Dietz and K. Ehrlich: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 193 (1998), pp.258-263.

[2] A. Kohyama, A. Hishinuma, D.S. Gelles, R.L. Klueh, W. Dietz and K. Ehrlich: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 233-237 (1996), pp.138-147.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(96)00327-3

[3] H.K. Yoon, S.W. Kim and S.P. Lee: International Journal of Modern Physics B Vol. 17 (2003), p.1547.

[4] A. Kohyama, Y. Kohno, M. Kuroda, A. Kimura and F. Wan: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 58-263 (1998), p.1319.

[5] G.E. Lucas, G.R. Odette, M. Sokolov, P. Spatig, T. Yamamoto and P. Jung: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 307-311 (2002), p.1600.

[6] G.R. Odette, M. He, D. Gragg, D. Klingensmith and G.E. Lucas: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 307-311 (2002), p.1643.

[7] C.S. Seok and S.Y. Kim: Nuclear Engineering and Design Vol. 214 (2002), pp.47-56.

[8] C.S. Seok: KSME International J. Vol. 14 (2000), pp.11-18.

[9] R. Moskovic, N.P. O'Dowd, M. Priest and P.E.J. Flewitt: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 251-252 (2003), pp.41-48.

[10] H.K. Yoon, D.H. Kim, Y.H. Park, Y.S. Kong and A. Kohyama: Key Engineering Materials Vol. 261-263 (2004), pp.147-152.