Preliminary Result of THA Using Interface Bioactive Bone Cement Technique Combined with Third Generation Cementing Technique

Article Preview

Abstract:

29 cases of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using interface bioactive bone cement technique (IBBC) combined with third generation cementing technique were evaluated clinically and radiologically. The present study includes 2 men 2 cases and 24 women 27 cases with an average age at operation of 63 years old (ranging 42 to 81). Mean postoperative follow up period was 17.3 months (ranging 12 to 23 months). Pre- and postoperative (1 year) evaluation using Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score were 36.0, and 85.0 points, respectively. Postoperative cementing grade using Barrack’s classification was A in every case. At one year, radiolucent line at bone-cement interface was not observed, except one case of rheumatoid arthritis patient at zone 3 (Delee and Charnley) in the acetabular side. Neither osteolysis nor loosening was observed in every case. No major complications, such as infection, dislocation, pulmonary embolization, were observed. The present study revealed excellent short-term result was obtained by IBBC technique combined with third generation cementing technique for primary THAs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 309-311)

Pages:

1329-1332

Citation:

Online since:

May 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Oonishi H, et al. J Arthroplasty 2001; 784-9.

Google Scholar

[2] Oonishi H, et al. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 2000; 174-80.

Google Scholar

[3] Oonishi H, et al. J. Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997; 79-B: 87-92.

Google Scholar

[4] Barrack RL, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 May; 74(3): 385-9.

Google Scholar

[5] Hodgkinson JP, et al. Clin Orthop. 1988 (228): 105-9.

Google Scholar

[6] Harris WH, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Sep; 64(7): 1063-7.

Google Scholar

[7] DeLee JG, et al. Clin Orthop. 1976 (121): 20-32.

Google Scholar

[8] Gruen TA, et al. Clin Orthop. 1979 Jun; (141): 17-27.

Google Scholar

[9] Iida H, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Mar; 82(2): 176-84.

Google Scholar

[10] Slooff TJJH et al. Acta Orthop Scand 1984, 55, 593-6.

Google Scholar

[11] Knight WE et al. Clin Orthop. 1982; (163): 167-9.

Google Scholar

[12] Fujita, H, et al. J Arthroplasty, vol. 18 (3), 2003, 367-70.

Google Scholar

[13] Kobayashi S, et al. Lancet, vol 355, April 29, 2000, 1499-1504.

Google Scholar

[14] Schmalzried TP, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992 Jul; 74(6): 849-63.

Google Scholar

[15] Fujita H, et al. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 49, 2000, 273-288.

Google Scholar