Mapping the Microstructure–Property Relationships in Cortical Bone

It Meng Low; Wei Kong Pang; Ian J. Davies

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.309-311.523

Paper Titles

Synthetic Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles Mimetic of Bone Mineral: Similarities in Composition and Morphology
p.507

RF Induction Plasma Synthesized Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles
p.511

Properties of Calcium Phosphate Powder Prepared from Phosphoryl Oligosaccharides of Calcium
p.515

Nanostructured Apatite Coatings for Rapid Bone Repair
p.519

Mapping the Microstructure–Property Relationships in Cortical Bone
p.523

Dissolution Kinetics of Nanoparticulate Calcium Phosphates and Inorganic Bone Phase
p.527

Hydroxyapatite/Chondroitin Sulfate Microparticles with Different Particle Size and its Adsorption Ability of Proteins
p.533

Remineralization Potential of New Toothpaste Containing Nano-Hydroxyapatite
p.537

Tooth Whitening Effect of Toothpastes Containing Nano-Hydroxyapatite
p.541

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 309-311Mapping the Microstructure–Property Relationships...

Mapping the Microstructure–Property Relationships in Cortical Bone

Abstract:

Structure-property relationships in bovine cortical bone have been characterised using grazing-incidence synchrotron radiation diffraction, Vickers indentation and mechanical testing. Depth profiling results indicated the existence of distinct gradual changes in crystal disorder, phase abundance, and texture of hydroxyapatite whilst the crystallite size was depth-independent.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 309-311)

Pages:

523-526

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.309-311.523

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2006

Authors:

It Meng Low, Wei Kong Pang, Ian J. Davies

Keywords:

Bone, Graded Structure, Synchrotron Radiation Diffraction, Vickers Indentation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] S. Weiner and H.D. Wagner: Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. Vol. 28 (1998), p.271.

Google Scholar

[2] J. -Y. Rho, L. Kuhn-Spearing and P. Zioupos: Med. Eng. Phys. Vol. 20 (1998), p.92.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Nakano, K. Kaibara, Y. Tabata, N. Nagata, S. Enomoto, E. Marukawa and Y. Umakoshi: Bone, Vol. 31 (2002), p.479.

DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00850-5

Google Scholar

[4] T. Nakano, T. Awazu and Y. Umakoshi: Scripta Mater. Vol. 44 (2001), p.811.

Google Scholar

[5] W. Bonfield and M.D. Grynpas: Nature Vol. 270 (1977), p.453.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Sasaki, N. Matsushima, T. Ikawa, H. Yamamura and A. Fukuda: J. Biomech. Vol. 22 (1989), p.157.

Google Scholar

[7] H.D. Wagner and S. Weiner: J. Biomech. Vol. 25 (1992), p.1311.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Ziv, H.D. Wagner and S. Weiner: Bone Vol. 18 (1996), p.417.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Bocciarelli: Calcif. Tissue Res. Vol. 5 (1970), p.261.

Google Scholar

[10] I.M. Low: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 87 (2004), p.2125.

Google Scholar

[11] A. G, Atkins and Y.W. Mai: Elastic and Plastic Fracture (John Wiley, UK, 1988). Fig. 6: Comparison of (211) peak broadening in the structure of bone. Table 1: Mechanical and impact properties of cortical bone. HV (GPa) Cross-section HV (GPa) Longitudinal σF (MPa) EF (GPa) KIC (MPa⋅m1/2) IS (kJ⋅m-2) IT (kJ⋅m-2) 5. 7 ± 0. 2 5. 3 ± 0. 2 300 ± 15 6. 6 ± 0. 3 0. 20 ± 0. 01 2. 8 ± 0. 3 2. 4 ± 0. 3.

Google Scholar