Anorganic Bone Mineral Coated with Tetra-Cell Adhesion Molecule Enhances Bone Formation in Rabbit Calvarial Defects

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study was performed to evaluate the effect of anorganic bone mineral (ABM) coated with Tetra-Cell Adhesion Molecule (T-CAM) for bone formation in rabbit calvarial defects and compare the capability of bone formation in ABM coated with T-CAM (ABM/T-CAM) to that in commercially available ABM coated with a synthetic peptide (P-15) which mimics the cell-binding domain of type I collagen, PepGen P-15TM. T-CAM composed of four cell adhesion molecules (RGD, PHSRN, EPDIM, and YH) was synthesized and ABM/T-CAM were prepared by absorbing T-CAM on ABM (OsteoGraf/N-300; Densply Friadent Ceramed Corp., USA). Two 9-mm diameter, full-thickness calvarial defects were made in each rabbit parietal bone and sixteen adult male rabbits were used in this experiment. The defects were reconstructed according to four treatment groups: unfilled, BM-grafted, PepGen P-15TM-grafted, and ABM/T-CAM-grafted. The animals were sacrificed at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery for histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. An active new bone formation were observed in the defects of ABM/T-CAM and PepGen P-15TM grafted groups at 2 and 4 weeks of healing in histologic observation. The results of histomorphometric analysis revealed higher new bone formation in ABM/T-CAM-grafted (14.62±0.6% at 2 weeks, 15.33±2.4% at 4 weeks) and PepGen P-15TM-grafted (12.46±1.0% at 2 weeks, 18.14±1.7% at 4 weeks) groups than in unfilled control (7.03±2.3% at 2 weeks, 8.71±3.4% at 4 weeks) and ABMgrafted (6.59±1.7% at 2 weeks, 9.25±0.8% at 4 weeks) groups at 2 and 4 weeks of healing with statistical significance (P<0.01). The results of this study indicated that the immobilizing T-CAM on ABM enhances the capability of bone substitutes to serve as an effective habitat for bone forming cells in vivo. In conclusion, we suggested that this composite graft material, ABM/T-CAM may be served as an effective tissue-engineered bone graft material in osseous reconstructive surgery.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 309-311)

Pages:

981-984

Citation:

Online since:

May 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Pytela, M.D. Pierschbacher, and E. Ruoslahti: Cell Vol 40 (1985), pp.191-198.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Ruoslahti and M.D. Pierschbacher: Science Vol 238 (1987), pp.291-297.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Verrier, A. Jonkczyk, M. Dard, and J. Amede: J Bone Miner Res Vol 23 (1998), S535.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Rezania and K.E. Healy: J Orthop Res Vol 17 (1999), pp.615-623.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Kantlehner, P. Schaffner, D. Finsinger, J. Meyer, A. Jonczyk, B. Diefenbach, B. Nies, G. Holzemann, S.L. Goodman, and H. Kessler: Chembiochem Vol 1 (2000), pp.107-114.

DOI: 10.1002/1439-7633(20000818)1:2<107::aid-cbic107>3.0.co;2-4

Google Scholar

[6] A. Krammer, D. Craig, W.E. Thomas, K. Schulten, and V. Vogel: Matrix Biol Vol 21 (2002), pp.139-147.

Google Scholar

[7] J. -E. Kim, H. -W. Jeong, J. -O. Nam, B. -H. Lee, J. -Y. Choi, R. -W. Park, J. -Y. Park, and I. -S. Kim: J Biol Chem Vol 29 (2002), pp.46159-46165.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Itoh, M. Matubara, T. Kawauchi, H. Nakamura, S. Yukitake, S. Ichinose, and K. Shinomiga: J Mater Sci Mater Med Vol 12 (2001), pp.575-581.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1011277207574

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Yang, C. Renee, and J.L. Ong: J Biomed Mater Res Vol 67 (2003), pp.344-349.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Schliephake, D. Scharnweber, M. Dard, A. Sewing, A. Aref, and S. Roessler: J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater Vol 73 (2005), pp.88-96.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30183

Google Scholar