Paper Titles

In Vivo Evaluation of Hydrothermally Converted Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Graft Substitute
p.135

Electrohydrodynamic Processing Routes for Bioceramics
p.139

Influence of Solvent Polarity on Synthesis of Beta - Tricalcium Phosphate
p.143

Influence of Hydrothermal Reaction Temperature and pH on Phase Stability of Hydroxyapatite
p.147

The Effect of Different Ratios of Zeolite Content in the Phosphate-Bonded Investment on Surface Roughness and Dimensional Change of the Casting
p.151

Preparation of Apatite-Containing Calcium Phosphate Glass-Ceramics
p.157

Investigation of the Mixed Alkali Effect in a Range of Phosphate Glasses
p.161

Effect of Particle Size on New Bone Formation In Vivo Using Calcium Phopshate Glass
p.165

Preparation and Properties of Porous Apatite-Wollastonite Bioactive Glass-Ceramic
p.169

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 330-332The Effect of Different Ratios of Zeolite Content...

The Effect of Different Ratios of Zeolite Content in the Phosphate-Bonded Investment on Surface Roughness and Dimensional Change of the Casting

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, 2.5-10 weight % natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) was added into phosphate bonded- investment in consideration of its molecular sieve property. Before casting, thicknesses of specimens were measured in 50 x magnifying stereo microscope. Average surface roughness (Ra) was measured. The first group was assigned as control and no zeolite addition was performed. In the second group, 2.5%, in the third group 5%, in the fourth group 7.5% and in the fifth group 10% zeolite by weight was added to investment powder. According to our study, volumetric increase was determined in each group. The highest increase was observed in the second group with 1.87%. The lowest one was observed in the fifth group with 1.03%. The lowest surface roughness was determined in the second group with 4.41.m. Although surface roughness and volumetric change values demonstrated differences, the change between groups could not reach statistical significance. It can be concluded that zeolite can be added to phosphate-bonded investment in order to decrease surface roughness and dimensional change of casting.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Bioceramics 19

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 330-332)

Pages:

151-154

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.330-332.151

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2007

Authors:

N. Ari, L.S. Ozyegin, E. Kazasoglu, S. Calikkocaoglu

Keywords:

Casting, Clinoptilolite, Dimensional Change, Investment, Surface Roughness (SR), Zeolite

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Johnston J. F., et. al. Sounders Company. 3 rd Edition. Chapter 12. p.249.

[2] Lacy A. M., Mora A., Boonsiri I: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 54(1985) p.367.

[3] Ballard G. T., Leinfelder K. F., Taylor D. F: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 34 (1975) p.170.

[4] Verrett R. G., Duke E. S: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 61 (1989) p.418.

[5] United States number: 6, 551, 396.

[6] United States Patent: 4, 767, 733.

[7] Characteristics of zeolite raw material from Majerovce deposit http: /www. zeolite. sk/welcome. html.

[8] Juszczyk A. S., Radford D. R., Curtis R. V: Dental Materials, Vol. 16 (2000) p.26.

[9] Juszczyk A. S., Radford D. R., Curtis R. V: Dental Materials, Vol. 18 (2002) p.255.

[10] Frankel N., Pearson G. J., Labella R. J: Oral Reh. Vol. 25 (1998) p.101.

[11] Örtengren U., Andersson F., Elgh U., Terselius B: J. Dent Vol. 29 (2001) p.35.

[12] Mair L. H: Dental Materials Vol. 15 (1999) p.408.

[13] ISO 1101 Geometrical tolerancing; tolerances of form, definitions, symbols on drawings, (1983) p.342.

[14] Kontstantoulakis E., Nakajima H., Woody D. R., Miller A. W: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 80(1998) p.337.

[15] Ito M., Yamagishi T., Oshida Y., Munoz A. C: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 75 (1996) p.211.

[16] Gelbard S., Aoskar Y., Zalkind M., Stern N: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 71 (1994) p.1.

[17] Tjan A. H. L., Li T., Logan G. I., Baum L: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 66 (1991) p.157.

[18] Açıkgöz O., Yeşil Z: Atatürk University J of School of Dentistry, Vol. 7, (1997) p.2: 9-12 (in turkish).

[19] Smith C. D., Twiggs S. W., Fairhust C. W. Zwemer J. D: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 54 (1985) p.778.

[20] Low D., Mori T: Dental Materials, Vol. 15 (1999) p.185.

[21] Teteruck W. R., Mumford G: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 16 (1966) p.910.

[22] Ho E. K., Darwell B. W: J. Dent, Vol. 26 (1998) p.59.

[23] Lacy A. M., Fukui H., Jendresen M. D: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 49 (1983) p.52.

[24] Johnson A., Van N. R., Hatton P. V., Walsh J. M: Dental Materials, Vol. 19 (2003) p.218.

[25] Fusayama T., Yamane M: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 29 (1973) p.529.

[26] Açıkgöz O.,: Atatürk University J of School of Dentistry, Vol. 7, Number: 2 (1997) pp.9-12 (in turkish).

[27] Shillingburg H. T., et. al.: Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3 rd Edition. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. Chapter 21. Sayfa 365.

[28] Hung CC., Hou GL., Tsai CC., Huang CC: Koahsiung J. Med. Sci. Vol. 19 (2003) p.121.

[29] Nishimura F., Watari F., Nakamura H., Morita N: Shika Zairyo Kikai Vol. 6 (1990) p.857.

[30] Watari F., et., al.: Shika Zairyo Kikai Vol. 5 (1990) p.734.

[31] Kamemizu H., Wakamatsu N., Hata M., Goto T., Doi: Shikai. Tenbo. Vol. 65 (1985) p.1029.

[32] Yeşil Z: Atatürk University J of School of Dentistry, Vol. 4, Number: Vol. 2 (1994) p.90 (in turkish).

[33] DIN 4762 Surface roughness-Terminology, Part I: Surface and its parameters. (1984) p.166.

[34] Aydın A. K: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 65 (1991) p.763.

[35] Taga Y., Kawai K., Nokubi T: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 85 (2001) p.357.

[36] Cooney J. P., Doyle T. M: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. (1979) p.41: 411-417.

[37] Blackman R. B: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 83 (2000) p.187.

[38] Kancyper S. G., Koka S: J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 85 (2001) p.461.