Improvement in the Sensitivity of the Response of Diamond Thin Films to X-Ray

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to some inferior performance of Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) diamond dosimeters, their applications are somewhat limited. The quality of diamond films was improved using Microwave Plasma CVD (MWPCVD) by the modified processes such as cyclic deposition and in-situ plasma post-treatment. The simple radiation dosimeters were fabricated in a sandwich configuration. Influence of purity and orientation of the diamond films on the sensitivity of the dosimeters was studied. The results indicate that the radiation dosimeters have high sensitivity to X-ray and the response of the devices is linear with the X-ray flux. The higher the purity of films is, the higher the resistivity and sensitivity are. The dosimeter based on [100] film has higher sensitivity than that based on [111] film. The dosimeter based on films prepared by cyclic deposition has higher sensitivity than that based on films prepared by the conventional deposition. The characterization of the response to X-ray also shows that in-situ oxygen plasma post-treatment leads to the higher sensitivity of dosimeters compared with in-situ nitrogen, hydrogen plasma post-treatments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 336-338)

Pages:

1718-1721

Citation:

Online since:

April 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Bruzzi, M. Bucciolini, M. Casati, C. DeAngelis, S. Lagomarsino, I. Løvik, S. Onori and S. Sciortino: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in phys. Res. A Vol. 518 (2004), p.421.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2003.11.046

Google Scholar

[2] P. Ascarelli, E. Cappellia, D.M. Trucchi and G. Conte: Diamond Relat. Mater. Vol. 12 (2003), p.691.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Fidanzio, L. Azario, C. Venanzi, F. Pinzari and A. Piermattei: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in phys. Res. A Vol. 479 (2002), p.661.

Google Scholar

[4] C.M. Buttar, R. Airey, J. Conway, G. Hill, S. Ramkumar, G. Scarsbrook, R.S. Sussmann, S. Walker and A. Whitehead: Diamond Relat. Mater. Vol. 9 (2000), p.965.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-9635(00)00198-9

Google Scholar

[5] M. Jung, Ph. Merer, J. Morel, C. Teissier and P. Siffert: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in phys. Res. A Vol. 511 (2003), p.417.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Wang, J.G. Ran and L. Gou: Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition) Vol. 36(4) (2004), p.57.

Google Scholar

[7] X. Z. Gu: Oncology Radiotherapy (Beijing Medical University Press/China Xiehe Medical University Press, Beijing 1993).

Google Scholar

[8] C. Jany, F. Foulon, P. Bergonzo, A. Brambilla, A. Gicqel and T. Pochet: Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in phys. Res. A Vol. 380 (1996), p.107.

Google Scholar