Fatigue Crack Growth Simulation by Using S-Version FEM

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fatigue crack growth under mixed mode loading conditions is simulated using S-version FEM (Superposition FEM, S-FEM). By using S-FEM technique, only local mesh should be re-meshed and it becomes easy to simulate crack growth. By combining with re-meshing technique, local mesh is re-meshed automatically, and curved crack path is modeled easily.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 385-387)

Pages:

761-764

Citation:

Online since:

July 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[5] is recorded the plural cracks problem but it is refined in two-dimensional problem. The result in this paper showed the spatial crack growth of plural cracks. The growth trend was almost same with two-dimensional result. Fig. 8 two cracks configuration at step 10 Fig. 9 two cracks configuration at step 15 Using S-FEM to conduct plural cracks is more flexible because the local models containing crack were re-meshed seperately. Using the general FEM, re-meshing will become complex and difficult when two crack tips get closer. S-FEM avoid this difficulty and can also get good simulation result. Summary S-FEM was adopted to calculate several fatigue crack problems. From the result, we can find that S- FEM is a feasible. And combined with Richard's criteria it is easy to applied to fatigue fracture. Especially, it is very useful in three-dimensional problem. It can avoid some difficulties occurred in general FEM. References.

DOI: 10.1108/ijsi-10-2019-0107

Google Scholar

[1] J. Fish AND S. Markolefas, in: The S-version of the Finite Element Method for Multilayer Laminates International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 33, 1081-1 105 (1992).

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620330512

Google Scholar

[2] H. Okada, S. Endoh and M. Kikuchi, in: On Fracture Analysis using an Element Overlay Technique Engineering Fracture Mechanics 72(2005) 773-789.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.05.003

Google Scholar

[3] H.A. Richard, M. Sander, M. Fulland, and G. Kullmer, in: Development of Fatigue crack Growth in Real Structures Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75(2008) 331-340.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.017

Google Scholar

[4] R. Citarella and F. -G. Buchholz, in: Comparison of crack growth simulation by DBEM and FEM for SEN-specimens undergoing torsion or bending loading Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Volume 75, Issues 3-4, 2008, Pages 489-509.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.039

Google Scholar

[5] J.R. Yates, M. Zanganeh, R.A. Tomlinson and M.W. Brown, in: Crack paths under mixed mode loading Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75(2008) 319-330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.05.014

Google Scholar