In Vivo Evaluation of Porous Titanium Implants with Biomimetic Coating

Article Preview

Abstract:

The osseointegration of porous titanium implants was evaluated in the present work. Implants were fabricated from ASTM grade 2 titanium by a powder metallurgy method. Part of these implants were submitted to chemical and thermal treatment in order to deposit a biomimetic coating, aiming to evaluate its influence on the osseointegration of the implants. The implants were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Electron Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) and Raman Spectroscopy. Three coated and three control (uncoated) implants were surgically inserted into thirty albino rabbits’ left and right tibiae, respectively. Tibiae samples were submitted to histological and histomorphometric analyses, utilizing SEM, optical microscopy and mechanical tests. EDS results indicated calcium (Ca) and phosphorous (P) at the surface and Raman spectra exhibited an intense peak, characteristic of hydroxyapatite (HA). Bone neoformation was detected at the bone-implant interface and inside the pores, including the central ones. The mean bone neoformation percentage in the coated implants was statistically higher at 15 days, compared to 30 and 45 days. The mechanical tests showed that coated implants presented higher resistance to displacement, especially after 30 and 45 days.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 396-398)

Pages:

179-182

Citation:

Online since:

October 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Lumbikanonda, R. Sammons: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Vol 16 (2001), p.627.

Google Scholar

[2] M.V. Oliveira, L.C. Pereira, C.A.A. Cairo: Mater Res Vol 5 (2002), p.269.

Google Scholar

[3] E. Eisenbarth, D. Velten, J. Breme: Biomol Eng Vol 24 (2007), p.27.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Nishiguchi, T. Nakamura, M. Kobayashi, H.M. Kim, F. Miyaji, T. Kokubo: Biomaterials Vol 20 (1999), p.491.

Google Scholar

[5] E.C.S. Rigo, A.O. Boschi, M. Yoshimoto, S. Allegrini, B. Konig, M.J. Carbonari: Mater Sci Eng C Vol 24 (2004), p.647.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Kokubo, F. Miyaji, H.M. Kim: J Am Ceram Soc Vol 79 (1996), p.1127.

Google Scholar

[7] R.M. Pilliar: Implant Dentistry Vol 7 (1988), p.305.

Google Scholar

[8] G.M. Vidigal Jr, L.C.A. Aragones, A. Campos Jr, M. Groisman: Implant Dent Vol 8 (1999), p.295.

Google Scholar

[9] W.S. Medeiros, M.V. Oliveira, L.C. Pereira, C.A.A. Cairo, M.A. Calixto: Mater Sci Forum Vol 530-531 (2006), p.569.

Google Scholar

[10] M.C. Andrade, M.R.T. Filgueiras, T. Ogasawara: J Eur Ceram Soc Vol 22 (2002), p.505.

Google Scholar