Identification of Crack Parameters in a Cantilever Beam under Uncertain End Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

The local effect of “softening” at the crack location can be simulated by an equivalent spring connecting the two segments of the beam. As modelling the crack, the non-perfectly rigid clamp is also simulated as a torsional spring of unknown stiffness. Combined with the Bernoulli-Euler theories of beam, the present model is applied to derive the characteristic equation of the cantilever beam under uncertain end conditions related to the crack parameters, namely, the location and the depth of the crack. Based on this characteristic equation, an accurate crack identification method is developed to identify the location and the depth of the crack by minimizing the difference between the analytical and experimental frequency values. The proposed approach is verified by two cantilever beam experiments under ideal boundary conditions and uncertain end conditions. It is found that the location and the depth of the crack can be worked out when at least three natural frequencies are known. For crack identification of the cantilever beam under uncertain end conditions, the identified crack location of the proposed approach is more accurate than the Narkis’ method. Furthermore, the crack depth can also be obtained by the present method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 413-414)

Pages:

117-124

Citation:

Online since:

June 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Dimaroogonas A D: Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Vol. 5 (1996), p.831.

Google Scholar

[2] Ma Hongwei, Yang Guitong: Advances in Mechanics. Vol. 29 (1999), p.513.

Google Scholar

[3] Christides S, Barr A D S: Int J Mech Sci. Vol. 26, 11/12 (1984), p.639.

Google Scholar

[4] Chondros T G, Dimaronogas A D: Transaction of the ASME. Vol. 120 (1998), p.742.

Google Scholar

[5] Carneiro S H S, Inman D J: Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 24 (2001), p.729.

Google Scholar

[6] Dimarogonas A D, in: General Electric Co. Internal Report, Schenectady, NY (1970).

Google Scholar

[7] Chondros T G, Dimarogonas A D: Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 69 (1980), p.531.

Google Scholar

[8] Joshi A, Madhusudhan B S: Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 147 (1991), p.475.

Google Scholar

[9] Kim J T and Stubbs N: Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 259 (2003), p.145.

Google Scholar

[10] Yang X F, Swamidas A S J, Seshadri R: Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 244 (2001), p.339.

Google Scholar

[11] Stubbs N, Osegueda R: Global damage detection in solids -experimental verification. Int. J. Analyt. Exper. Modal analysis. Vol. 5(1990), p.81.

Google Scholar

[12] Ju F D, Mimovich M E. Experimental diagnosis of fracture damage in structures by the modal frequency method. J. Vibr. Acoust. Stress Reliability Design. 1988, 110, 456-463.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3269550

Google Scholar

[13] Narkis Y, Elmalah E: Int J Mech Sci. Vol. 38 (1996), p.499.

Google Scholar

[14] Khiem N T, Lien T V: Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2001, Vol. 245 (2001), p.737. Inflicted crack parameters Measured frequencies Results of present paper Narkis' results Location.

Google Scholar