Bayesian Logic Applied to Damage Assessment of a Smart Precast Concrete Element

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the laboratory validation of a prototype optic-fiber instrumented structural element. The element is a reduced-scale reinforced concrete beam, of dimensions 3.8×0.3×0.5m that can be pre-stressed by an internal Dywidag bar. The sensing technology is based on a multiplexed version of the SOFO strain sensor, prepared in the form of a 3-field smart composite bar; in-line multiplexing is obtained by separating each measurement field through broadband FBGs. The experiment aims to identify the response of the sensors to differing damage conditions artificially produced in the element, including cracking and loss of prestressing. A numerical algo-rithm, based on Bayesian logic, is applied to real-time diagnosis: by processing the sensor meas-urements and prior information, the method assigns a posterior probability to each assumed damage scenario, as well as the updated probability distributions for each relevant structural parameter. With respect to classical damage detection approaches, the merit of those based on Bayesian logic is to provide not only information on the damage, but also the degree of confidence in this informa-tion. The paper discusses the ability of the system to identify the differing damage conditions. The reported test clearly shows that an occurrence such as a loss of prestressing can be recognized early with a high degree of reliability based on the strain data acquired.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 413-414)

Pages:

351-358

Citation:

Online since:

June 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H.M. Koh, and D.M. Frangopol (Eds. ): Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Health Monitoring and Informatics (Balkema, Rotterdam 2008).

Google Scholar

[2] E. Udd (Ed. ): Fiber Optic Sensors: An Introduction for Engineers and Scientists (WileyInterscience, Hoboken 1991).

Google Scholar

[3] F. Ansari (Ed. ): Fiber Optic Sensors for Construction Materials and Bridges (Technomic Publishing Co, Lancaster 1998).

Google Scholar

[4] F. Ansari, in: Proc. of the US - Europe Workshop on Sensors and Smart Structures Technology, Wiley (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] R.M. Measures: Structural monitoring with fiber optic technology (Academic Press, London 2001).

Google Scholar

[6] D. Zonta, M. Pozzi, H.Y. Wu, and D. Inaudi, in: Sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems 2008, Proc. of the SPIE, Vol. 6932 (2008).

DOI: 10.1117/12.779508

Google Scholar

[7] Information on http: /www. smartec. ch.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Pozzi, D. Zonta, H.Y. Wu, and D. Inaudi: Optical Fiber Technology Vol. 14 (2008), p.281.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Zonta, M. Pozzi, H.Y. Wu, and D. Inaudi, in: Proc. 4th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, DEStech Publications (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] T. Bayes: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 53 (1763), p.370.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Gregory: Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005).

Google Scholar

[12] D.S. Sivia: Data Analysis: a Bayesian Tutorial (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996).

Google Scholar

[13] European Committee for Standardisation (CEN): EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (CEN, Bruxelles 2004).

Google Scholar

[14] F.H. Walters, J.L.R. Parker, S.L. Morgan, S.N. Deming: Sequential Simplex Optimization (CRC Press, Boca Raton 1991).

Google Scholar