Evaluation of Flexural Performance in UHPC(Ultra High Performance Concrete) According to Placement Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

Apart from its high compressive, tensile and flexural strengths reaching approximately 200MPa, 15MPa and 35MPa, respectively, Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) is characterized by its high resistance against degrading factors that can delay their penetration and diffusion speeds down to 1/20 to maximum 1/10,000 compared to ordinary concrete. UHPC also exhibits self-compaction properties with a slump flow of about 220mm. Furthermore, the most remarkable feature of UHPC is the improvement of its flexural strength and toughness through the admixing of steel fiber. Accordingly, this study evaluates the effects of the placement method on the flexural performance of UHPC. As a result, the flexural strength of UHPC appears to be extremely dependent on the placement method with variation of the maximum flexural strength up to 2 to 3 times while poor influence is observed on the initial crack strength.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 417-418)

Pages:

581-584

Citation:

Online since:

October 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Richard, P. and Cheyrezy, M., Composition of Reactive Powder Concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 25, No. 7, 1995, pp.1501-1511.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2

Google Scholar

[2] Naaman, A.E. and Reinhardt, H.W., Characterization of High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites-HPFRCC, " Proceedings of the Second International Workshop 'HPFRCD2, 1995, pp.3-6.

DOI: 10.51202/9783816793977-3

Google Scholar

[37] 3 0. 834.

Google Scholar

[38] 2.

Google Scholar

067 16. 0 9. 3.

Google Scholar

[35] 8 0. 562 0. 060 16. 8 8. 6.

Google Scholar

[41] 5 0. 944 0. 069 17. 2 10. 2 Partition.

Google Scholar

[32] 7 0. 376.

Google Scholar

[36] 2.

Google Scholar

062 17. 0 7. 1.

Google Scholar

[33] 1 0. 520 0. 073 15. 4 6. 6.

Google Scholar

[36] 4 0. 775 0. 069 9. 9 8. 7.

Google Scholar

[42] 8 0. 862 0. 047 17. 4 10. 4 Bending direction.

Google Scholar

[34] 4 1. 033.

Google Scholar

[33] 3.

Google Scholar

082 9. 7 9. 3.

Google Scholar

[34] 4 0. 885 0. 072 14. 9 8. 1.

Google Scholar

[31] 2 0. 705 0. 078 15. 5 7. 3 Bending normal direction.

Google Scholar

[11] 7 0. 053.

Google Scholar

[13] 7.

Google Scholar

053 11. 7 1. 7.

Google Scholar

[15] 9 0. 069 0. 069 15. 9 1. 2.

Google Scholar

[13] 6 0. 099 0. 032 10. 5 1. 9.

Google Scholar

[13] 6 0. 068 0. 068 13. 6 2. 3 Hook.

Google Scholar

[29] 8 0. 845.

Google Scholar

[32] 3.

Google Scholar

047 9. 0 6. 9.

Google Scholar

[31] 9 0. 638 0. 084 16. 4 7. 8.

Google Scholar

[35] 2 1. 160 0. 086 13. 1 8. 5 Placement at center.

Google Scholar

[40] 7 1. 008.

Google Scholar

[35] 3.

Google Scholar

085 15. 6 9. 9.

Google Scholar

[32] 4 0. 705 0. 065 14. 7 7. 8.

Google Scholar

[30] 1 0. 661 0. 073 16. 4 6. 6.

Google Scholar

[30] 5 0. 714 0. 071 16. 2 7. 2.

Google Scholar

[43] 1 1. 363 0. 079 16. 5 11. 0.

Google Scholar