Parameter Optimization towards Highest Micro MIM Density by Using Taguchi Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nowadays, micro metal injection molding has become among the promising method in powder metallurgy research to produce small-scale intricate part at an effective process and competitive cost for mass production. This paper investigated the optimization of highest green strength which plays an important characteristic in determining the successful of micro MIM. In this paper, stainless steel SS 316L with D50 = 5.96µm was used with composite binder, which consists of PEG (Polyethelena Glycol), PMMA (Polymethyl Methacrilate) and SA (Stearic Acid). Feedstock with 61.5% with several injection parameters were optimized which highly significant through screening experiment such as injection pressure(A), injection temperature(B), mold temperature(C), injection time(D) and holding time(E). Besides that, interaction effects between injection pressure, injection temperature and mold temperature were also considered to optimize in the Taguchi’s orthogonal array. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (S/N-larger is better) for green density was also presented in this paper. Result shows that interaction between injection temperature and mold temperature(BxC) give highest significant factor followed by interaction between injection pressure and mold temperature(AxC). Single factor that also contributes to significant optimization are mold temperature(C) and injection time(D). This study shows that Taguchi method would be among the best method to solve the problem with minimum number of trials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

705-710

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lee BH, Kim BH: Polym-Plastic Tech Eng 34(5) (1995), p.793.

Google Scholar

[2] Huang MC, Tai CC: J Mater Process Tech 110 (2001), p.1.

Google Scholar

[3] Jacques MS: Polym Eng Sci 22 (1982), p.241.

Google Scholar

[4] Beiter K, Ishii K, Hornherger L: ASME-DED 31 (1991), p.111.

Google Scholar

[5] Ji CH, Loh NH, Khor KA, Tor SB: Materials Science and Engineering A311(2001), p.74.

Google Scholar

[6] Jamaludin KR, Muhamad N, Ab Rahman MN, Amin SYM, Murtadhahadi: Proceeding of International Conference of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Ghani JA, Choudhury IA, Hassan HH: J. of Materials Processing Technology 145(2004), p.84.

Google Scholar

[8] Ahmad S, Muhamad N, Muchtar A, Sahari J, Jamaludin KR, Ibrahim MHI, Nor NHM: Proceeding of International Conference of Sustainable Energy (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] Chen RS, Lee HH, Yu CY: Composite Structures 39(1997), p.209.

Google Scholar

[10] Tuncay E, Babur O: Materials and Design 27(2006), p.853.

Google Scholar

[11] Oktem H, Tuncay E, Ibrahim U: Materials and Design 28(2007), p.1271.

Google Scholar

[12] Montgomery DC, Design and analysis of experiments, 3rd edition, Wiley, New York (1991).

Google Scholar

[13] Ibrahim MHI, Muhamad N, Sulong AB: International Journal of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol 4. (2009)No. 1, p.1.

Google Scholar

[14] Taguchi G, Introduction to quality engineering. New York, USA McGraw-Hill (1990).

Google Scholar