Influences of Crack Face Bridging Stress and Microstructure on Fracture Toughness of Toughened Alumina Ceramics

Abstract:

Three types of polycrystalline alumina, one pressureless and two hot press sintered Al2O3, were used to examine the effects of the characteristics of microstructure and crack face bridging on fracture toughness. The crack opening displacements and microstructures along the pop-in crack of single edge precracked beam (SEPB) specimens were observed in situ at a constant applied stress intensity factor by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bridging stress distribution could be determined from the measured crack opening displacement by three-dimensional finite element analysis, and then the stress intensity factor and stress shielding effect at the crack tip could also be determined. Intergranular microcracks of toughened Al2O3 were deflected by a complicated microstructure, and crack closure due to bridging grains was observed near the crack tip. Bridging stress of Al2O3 was compressive perpendicular to the crack face and was distributed behind the crack tip. The maximum bridging stress of two hot press sintered Al2O3 was about twice as large as that of pressureless sintered Al2O3. The fracture toughness of hot press sintered Al2O3 was, therefore, higher than that of pressureless sintered Al2O3, because the total amount of bridging stress and stress shielding effect increased with increasing magnitude of microcrack deflection and the number of interlocking grains.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 462-463)
• Pages: 972-978
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.462-463.972
• Online since: January 2011
• Authors: Yoshihisa Sakaida, Hajime Yoshida, Shotaro Mori
• Keywords: Crack Face Bridging, Crack Opening Displacement, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Fracture Toughness, Microstructure, Stress-Shielding Effect, Toughened Alumina

References

[1] Ed. by Fine Ceramics Research Association, Synergy Ceramics II, (2004), p.87, Gihodo shuppan, Japan.

[2] J. J. Kruzic, R. M. Cannon and R. O. Ritchie: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 87 (2004), p.93.

[3] F. Meschke, O. Raddatz, A. Kolleck and G. A. Schneider: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 83 (2000), p.353.

[4] G. Pezzotti, N. Muraki, N. Maeda, K. Satou and T. Nishida: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 82 (1999), p.1249.

[5] Y. Wang, U. Anandakumar and R. N. Singh: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 83 (2000), p.1207.

[6] C. J. Gilbert and R. O. Ritchie: Acta Materialia Vol. 46 (1998), p.609.

[7] R. Yuan, J. J. Kruzic, X. F. Zhang, L. C. D. Jonghe and R. O. Ritchie: Acta Materialia Vol. 51 (2003), p.6477.

[8] Y. Sakaida, Y. Sawaki, K. Tanaka and Y. Akiniwa: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 490-491 (2005), p.35.

[9] Y. Sakaida and S. Mori: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 571-572 (2008), p.243.

[10] Y. Sakaida, S. Mori and K. Tanaka: Proc. 42nd Symp. on X-ray Studies on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, (2007), p.132.