Research on Enterprises Scientific Development Performance Evaluation Model

Abstract:

According to the connotation of Scientific Outlook on Development, this paper constructs an enterprises scientific development performance evaluation model based on factor analysis and combination weighting. The innovation points and contributions are in three aspects. First, by evaluating performance from the manpower criterion, the basic idea of Scientific Outlook on Development of people-oriented is reflected. Second, by applying the factor analysis to screen evaluation indicators, fourteen indicators are selected to reflect more than 85% of original information and avoids information duplication and redundancy. Third, by determining the combination weight through multiplicative synthesis method based on G1 and TOPSIS, it fully utilizes experts’ subjective experiences and objective information.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 467-469)
• Pages: 1887-1892
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.467-469.1887
• Online since: February 2011
• Authors: Yun Jiang Geng
• Keywords: Combination Weighting, Factor Analysis (FA), Performance Evaluation, Scientific Development

References

[1] Kaplan, R. S. and D.P. Norton: Harvard Business Review, 1992, pp.71-79.

[2] Andy Neely, Chris Adams and Mike Kennerle: The performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing stakeholder Relationships (Prentice Hall, London 2002).

[3] Zongchang Yang and Bo Xu: Accounting Research, Vol. 12 (2003), pp.22-23.

[4] Subin Wen and Hengxin Xue: Statistics and Decision-Making, Vol. 3 (2005), pp.126-128.

[5] Hongrong Guo: Liaoning Economy, Vol. 10 (2006), pp.22-23.

[6] Jianqiang Wan and Zhou Wen: Forcast, Vol. 5(2001), pp.39-42.

[7] Zhengwei Zhu: Statistics and information Forum, Vol. (2003), pp.76-79.

[8] Shizong Chen, Bangchuan Lai and Xiaohong Chen: System Engineering, Vol. 6(2006), pp.99-104.

[9] Jiannan Wu and Wenjing Guo: Management Review, Vol. 6(2004), pp.26-27.

[10] Yuehui Wu: Environment science and management, Vol. 30(2005), pp.109-110.

[11] Pengfei Yu and Lina Wang: Friends of Accounting, Vol. 12(2005), pp.41-44.

[12] Yajun Guo: the theory and methods of comprehensive evaluation (Science Press, Beijing 2002).