Effect of Nickel Composition and Preparation Method for Production of Hydrogen via Glycerol Steam Reforming

Article Preview

Abstract:

The need and development of cleaner and greener alternative technologies using the heterogeneous catalytic system in the synthesis of fuel is very important. In this work hydrogen production via steam reforming of glycerol (C3H8O3) was carried out over nickel supported on hydroxyapatite [Ca5(PO4)3(OH)] as a biomaterial catalyst. The time reaction is carried out for 240 minutes in a fixed-bed reactor fixed at 600 oC and atmospheric pressure with the water-to-glycerol feed ratio of 8:1. Catalysts were prepared by mean of impregnation and sol-gel method with varied nickel loadings (3, 6, 9, 12 %) on hydroxyapatite. The catalysts were characterized by BET surface area, X-ray diffraction, and SEM-EDX techniques. It is found that 3 wt% of nickel loading prepared via sol-gel method exhibit the higher hydrogen production rates (63.62 % - 74.16 %) in comparison to the other nickel loadings.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 471-472)

Pages:

1046-1051

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. S Esteban, A.C. Miguel: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy Vol. 35 (2010), pp.5902-5907.

Google Scholar

[2] CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] B. Zhang, X. Tang, Y. Li, Y. Xu, W. Shen: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 32 (2007), pp.2367-2373.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Adikhari, S.D. Fernando, S. Haryanto: Renewable Energy Vol. 33 (2008), pp.2097-1100.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Iriondo, V.L. Barior, J.F. Cambra, P.L. Arias M.B. Guemez, R.M. Navarro, Sanchez-Sanchez, J.L.G. Fierro: Top Catal Vol. 49 (2008), pp.46-58.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Sehested: Journal of Catalysis Vol. 217 (2003), pp.417-426.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Ashok, A.S. Kumar, M. Subrahmanyam, A. Venugopa: Catal Lett. 121: 283-290, (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Atir, S. Mallouk, K. Bougrin, M. Soufiaoui, A. Laghzizil: Synthetic Communication Vol. 36 (2006), pp.111-120.

DOI: 10.1080/00397910500330619

Google Scholar

[9] M. Campati, G. Fornasari, Vaccari: Catalysis Today Vol. 77 (2003), pp.299-314.

Google Scholar