Microanalysis Techniques for the Investigation of Interphases Formed between Thermoset and Thermoplastic Polymers: Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Prepreg resin systems are typically of complex composition and require very specific manufacturing conditions. These characteristics restrict the use of some commonly used micro analysis techniques. This paper investigates the use of low acceleration voltage scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray analysis for the characterization of diffused polymer interfaces. It is shown that, by operating at the dynamic charge balance, high resolution secondary electron images of polymer interfaces can be obtained and that conductive coating is not required. In addition, the effect of acceleration voltage on the interaction volume in EDX analysis is discussed using Monte Carlo simulation. X-ray intensity measurements in combination with afore mentioned Monte Carlo simulation is used to define practically obtainable spatial resolution limits. It is shown that by reducing the acceleration voltage below 5kV spatial resolution higher the 500nm can be obtained.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 471-472)

Pages:

309-314

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Munz M, Sturm H, Stark W. Polymer. 2005; 46(21): 9097-9112.

Google Scholar

[2] Munz M, Sturm H, Schulz E, Hinrichsen G. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 1998; 29(9-10): 1251-1259.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(98)00077-3

Google Scholar

[3] Rajagopalan G, Immordino KM, Gillespie Jr JW, McKnight SH. Polymer. 2000; 41(7): 2591-2602.

Google Scholar

[4] McKnight SH, Don RC, Scott M, Braem A, Gillespie JW. Experimental investigation of diffusion enhanced adhesive bonding for thermoplastic composites. Conference Proceedings, Society of Plastics Engineers, Annual Technical Meeting. (1995).

Google Scholar

[5] Rajagopalan G, Immordino KM, McKnight SH, Gillespie J. W, Jr. Proceedings of the 11th Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites. 1996: 539.

Google Scholar

[6] Immordino KM. Characterization of the Polysulfone/epoxy Interphase for Bonding Thermoplastic Composites. (1996).

Google Scholar

[7] Gilmore PT, Falabella R, Laurence RL. Polymer/polymer diffusion. 2. effect of temperature and molecular weight on macromolecular diffusion in blends of poly(vinyl chloride) and poly(ε-caprolactone). Macromolecules. 1980; 13(4): 880-883.

DOI: 10.1021/ma60076a022

Google Scholar

[8] Oyama HT, Solberg TN, Wightman JP. Polymer. 1999; 40(11): 3001-3011.

Google Scholar

[9] Spontak RJ, Williams MC, Agard DA. Interphase composition profile in SB/SBS block copolymers, measured with electron microscopy, and microstructural implications. Macromolecules. 1988; 21(5): 1377-1387.

DOI: 10.1021/ma00183a033

Google Scholar

[10] Jabbari E, Peppas NA. Journal of Materials Science. 1994; 29(15): 3969-3978.

Google Scholar

[11] Eklind H, Hjertberg T. Determination of interdiffusion in thin polymer films using FTIR reflection absorption spectroscopy. Macromolecules. 1993; 26(22): 5844-5851.

DOI: 10.1021/ma00074a004

Google Scholar

[12] Hong PP, Boerio FJ, Clarson SJ, Smith SD. An investigation of the interdiffusion of polystyrene and deuterated polystyrene using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Macromolecules. 1991; 24(17): 4770-4776.

DOI: 10.1021/ma00017a007

Google Scholar

[13] Tead SF, Kramer EJ, Russell TP, Volksen W. Interdiffusion at polyimide interfaces. Polymer. 1992; 33(16): 3382-3387.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(92)91095-j

Google Scholar

[14] Kramer EJ, Green P, Palmstrøm CJ. 1984; 25(4): 473-480.

Google Scholar

[15] Kramer EJ. Ion-beam analysis of polymer surfaces and interfaces. MRS Bulletin. 1996; 21(1): 37-42.

DOI: 10.1557/s0883769400035144

Google Scholar

[16] Joy D. Charging Control. ACMM19, Sydney2006.

Google Scholar

[17] Drouin D, Couture AR, Joly D, Tastet X, Aimez V, Gauvin R. CASINO V2. 42—A Fast and Easy-to-use Modeling Tool for Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis Users. Scanning. 2007; 29(3): 92-101.

DOI: 10.1002/sca.20000

Google Scholar