Effect of Sonication Time and Clay Loading on Nanoclay Dispersion and Thermal Property of Epoxy-Clay Nanocomposite

Article Preview

Abstract:

The development of nanoclay-epoxy nanocomposite material requires a suitable blending process to be employed. Amongst blending techniques, sonication has been one of the promising means for polymer-clay nanocomposite fabrication. In this study, epoxy-clay nanocomposites with 2, 4 and 5% clay loadings were fabricated using different sonication periods ranging from 5 to 60 minutes. The effect of sonication time and clay loading on the nanocomposite structure was investigated using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Micropscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS). Differential Scanning Calorimetry analysis indicated that while clay loading reduced the glass transition temperature (Tg), sonication time did not alter Tg significantly. Upon examining the structure of the resulting nanocomposites both exfoliation and intercalation structures were present, yet, neither structure was fully achieved; evident by the XRD patterns. Nonetheless, the predominant structures for most of the nanocomposites were intercalation. Intergallery spacing of the nanocomposites were enhanced with increased sonication time mainly at 2%wt loading; whereas further increase in nano-clay loading resulted in a reduction of the d-spacing. SEM analysis showed that clay agglomerates were present in the nanocomposites irrespective of the sonication time. However, the analysis revealed that dispersion of clay was better in the nanocomposite fabricated at higher sonication time. From the EDS analysis, the different sites in the nanocomposites’ microstructure were identified which were then correlated with the observation made in the fractographic analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 471-472)

Pages:

490-495

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. J. Luo and I.M. Daniel: Comp. Sci. and Tech. Vol. 63 (2003), p.1607–1616.

Google Scholar

[2] I. Isil, Y. Ulku and B. Goknur: Polymer Vol. 44 (2003), p.6371–6377.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Dean, J. Krstina, W. Tian and R. J. Varley: Macromolecular Material and Engineering Vol. 292 (2007), p.415–427.

Google Scholar

[4] S.C. Zunjarrao, R. Sriraman and R.P. Singh: Journal of Mater. Sci. Vol. 41 (2006), p.2219–2228.

Google Scholar

[5] L. Chun-ki, L. Kin-tak, C. Hoi-yan and L. Hang-yin. Materials Letters 59 (2005), pp.1369-1372.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Velmurugan and T.P. Mohan: Journal of Material Science Vol. 39 (2004), pp.7333-7339.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Farzana , C. Jihua and H. Mehdi: Mater. Sci. and Eng. Part A, 445–446 (2007), p.467–476.

Google Scholar

[8] W. Jinwei and Q. Shuchao: Materials letters Vol. 61 (2007), pp.4222-4224.

Google Scholar

[9] W. Jinwei, K. Xianghua, C. Lei and H. Yedong: Journal of University of Science and Technolology Beijing Vol. 15 Number 3 (2008), p.320.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Hernandez, B. Sixou, J. Duchet and H. Sautereau: Polymer Vol. 48 (2007), pp.4075-4086.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Weiping, V. H. Suong and P. Martin: Composites Sci. and Technol. Vol. 65 (2005), pp.307-316.

Google Scholar

[12] S. S Saeed, A.K. Akbar and B. Domagoj: Composites, Part B, Vol. 38 (2007), pp.102-107.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Asma, L. A. Jandro, and I. M. Daniel: Scripta Materialia Vol. 49 (2003), pp.81-86.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Man-Wai, L. Chun-Ki , L. Kin-tak, H. L. Dickon and H. David: Composites Structure Vol. 75 (2006), pp.415-421.

Google Scholar