Finite Element Simulation on Failure Assessment of Toughened Epoxy Adhesives

Article Preview

Abstract:

The prediction of the strength of adhesively bonded joints has been investigated using a variety of failure criteria such as maximum stress or strain, and fracture mechanics approaches. Fracture mechanics approaches based on the critical strain energy release rate, for crack propagation are applicable to highly cross-linked structural adhesives and have the advantage of avoiding the explicit consideration of the bi-material singularities inherent in adhesive joints. In the present work, the finite-element simulation of such adhesive joint has been performed and the R-curves of two different rubber-toughened epoxy adhesives were measured using double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens. The FE results are applied to be compared with the experimental results which were reported in the literature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

537-540

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] BSI. Determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy, GIC, of structural adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) specimens; 2001 [BS 7991].

DOI: 10.3403/02393962

Google Scholar

[2] ISO, Adhesives – determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy GIC of structural adhesive joints using double cantilever beam and tapered double beam specimens. ISO; (2009).

DOI: 10.3403/30148587u

Google Scholar

[25217] .

Google Scholar

[3] G.C. Jacob, J.F. Fellers, J.M. Starbuck, S. Simunovic. Crashworthiness of automotive composite material systems. J Appl Polymer Sci. 92(5) (2003) 3218–25.

DOI: 10.1002/app.20336

Google Scholar

[4] A. Ameli, M. Papini, J.A. Schroeder, J.K. Spelt. Fracture R-curve characterization of toughened epoxy adhesives. Engng Fract Mech. 77 (2010) 521–534.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.10.009

Google Scholar