An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Mixed-Mode Fracture Toughness and Lap Shear Strength of Aerospace Grade Composite Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present study, the mixed-mode fracture toughness of an adhesively bonded composite joint system was examined using a variety of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) based tests. These tests include the mode I double cantilever beam (DCB), mixed-mode asymmetrical DCB (ADCB) and mode II end load split (ELS) test. The joint system was also evaluated using the wide area lap shear (WALS) test that is often employed by the aerospace industry. While lap shear type tests are relatively simple to perform and post-process compared to their LEFM counterparts, the results can often be misleading and are greatly dependent on the overlap length, thickness of substrate and type of fillet. The experimental tests were also simulated using OpenFOAM, a finite volume based software package. Through this combined experimental-numerical approach, a greater understanding of the influence of the peel ply surface treatment and scrim cloth on the behaviour of the WALS test was achieved.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 488-489)

Pages:

549-552

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Q. Benard, M. Fois and M. Grisel, Composites: Part A, 2005, 36, pp.1562-1568.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. B. Park et al, Composite Structures, 2010, 92, p.2173–2180.

Google Scholar

[3] M. -G. Song et al, Composite Structures, 2010, 92, p.2194–2202.

Google Scholar

[4] B.R.K. Blackman and A.J. Kinloch, In Fracture Mechanics Testing Methods for Polymers, Adhesives and Composites. Elsevier Science, (2001).

Google Scholar

[5] B.R.K. Blackman, A.J. Brunner, and P. Davies. In Fracture Mechanics Testing Methods for Polymers, Adhesives and Composites, 2001, pp.335-359. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(01)80040-6

Google Scholar

[6] B.R.K. Blackman, A.J. Kinloch, and M. Paraschi, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2005, 72, pp.877-897.

Google Scholar

[7] OpenFOAM, www. wikki. co. uk, www. openfoam. co. uk, (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Camacho, G.T., Ortiz, M. International Journal of solids and structures, 1996, 33(20-22), pp.2899-2938.

Google Scholar