For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Ag-Doped Sol-Gel Derived Novel Composite Materials for Dental Applications
p.637
Effect of Different Surface Applications and Adhesive Systems on Bond Strength of Porcelain Repair Material
p.643
Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM Manufactured and Prefabricated Endodontic Posts
p.649
Influence of Nano-Hydroxyapatite Addition to Calcium Hydroxide Cement on its Properties
p.655
The Effect of Five Polishing Materials on the Surface Roughness of Acrylic and Composite Denture Resins
p.661
Regulating Protein Adsorption onto Hydroxyapatite: Amino Acid Treatment
p.666
Preparation of Calcium-Phosphate Microspheres by Salt-Assisted Ultrasonic Spray-Pyrolysis Technique and their Drug Release Behavior Using Anti-Angiogenic Agent, TNP-470
p.672
Preparation of Silver-Containing Hydroxyapatite Powder by Ultrasonic Spray-Pyrolysis Technique and its Antibacterial Property
p.678
Dissolution Medium Responsive Simvastatin Release from Biodegradable Apatite Cements Drug Delivery System - The Therapeutically Effect and their Histology in Osteoporosis Rats -
p.684

The Effect of Five Polishing Materials on the Surface Roughness of Acrylic and Composite Denture Resins

Article Preview

Abstract:

Rough surfaces of denture prosthesis promote adhesion of microorganisms and plaque formation. In dentistry ferric oxide, tin oxide, chrome oxide and pumice are the most commonly used materials for polishing of resins and other materials. Clinoptilolite that is in zeolitic structure resembles to pumice due to alumina silicate formations in its constitution. Surface roughness was evaluated by means of a surface roughness analyzing instrument, Perthometer There were 10 specimens for each acrylic resin and bis-acryl composite resin material and polishing method combination. Conventional lathe polishing with polishing paste served as surface roughness was determined with a profilometer and SEM microscope. ANOVA was applied to the all measurements and was statistically significant (p<0.001). The p-values were calculated using paired t-tests. The materials in order that are most successful at polishing PMMA surface are; clinoptilolite Ra 0,5 > Fe2O3 Ra 0,6 > Cr2O3 Ra 0,8> pumice Ra 1,2 > SnO2 Ra 1,6. the surface roughness values for Bis-acryl Composite are as follows: clinoptilolite Ra 0,6 > Fe2O3 0,8 Ra > Cr2O3 Ra 0,9 > pumice Ra 1,4 > SnO2 Ra 1,9. The most successful material for PMMA and Composite resin were clinoptilolite followed by; clinoptilolite, Fe2O3, Cr2O3, pumice, and SnO2 in order. The same results were confirmed with the scanning electron microscopic images. Within the light of the present study Clinoptilolite can be an alternative to pumice for polishing of PMMA.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Bioceramics 23 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 493-494)

Pages:

661-665

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.661

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

L.S. Ozyegin, B. Yesilbek, O. Bayrak, F.N. Oktar

Keywords:

Chrome Oxide, Clinoptilolite, Dental Polish, Ferric Oxide, Pumice, Surface Roughness (SR), TiN Oxide

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] H.J. Erli, R. Marx, O. Paar, F.U. Niethard, M. Weber and D. C Wirtz: Review, BioMedical Engineering OnLine, Vol. 2 (2003) pp.1-18.

DOI: 10.1186/1475-925x-2-15

Google Scholar

[2] M. Ulusoy, N. Ulusoy and A.K. Aydin: J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 56 (1986), pp.107-112.

Google Scholar

[3] C.M. Bollen, P. Lambrechts and M. Quirynen: Dent. Mater. Vol. 13 (1997), pp.258-269.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Phillips: Science of Dental Materials, 2003, pp.190-192.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Hosoya , K. Matsuzaka, T. Inoue and G.W. Jr. Marshall: Quintessence Int. Vol. 35 (2004), pp.605-611.

Google Scholar

[6] US Patent: 4, 911, 899, (1990).

Google Scholar

[7] US Patent: 6, 551, 607, (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Su, A. Demirutku, S. Özsoy, S. Arun and S. Özyeğin: Investigation of zeolite's healing effect (clinoptilolite) on scar tissue 3rd National Veterinary Medicine Students Research Congress, İstanbul, 10-12 May (2001).

Google Scholar

[9] S.D. Heintze, M. Forjanic and V. Rousson: Dent. Mater. Vol. 22 (2006), pp.146-165.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Sen, G. Goller and H. Issever: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 88 (2002), p, 527-531.

Google Scholar

[11] B.A. Kaplan, G.R. Goldstein, T.V. Vijayaraghavan and I.K. Nelson, J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 76 (1996), pp.34-38.

Google Scholar

[12] E.F. O'Donnell, D.R. Radford, G.F. Sinclair and R.K. Clark, Int. J. Prosthodont. Vol. 16 (2003), pp.233-238.

Google Scholar

[13] C.M. Bollen, W. Papaioannou, J. Van Eldere, E. Schepers, M. Quirynen and D. van Steenberghe: Clin. Oral Implants Res. Vol. 7 (1996), pp.201-211.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x

Google Scholar

[14] M. Quirynen, C.M. Bollen, W. Papaioannou, J. Van Eldere, D. van Steenberghe, Int. J. Oral and Maxillofac. Implants Vol. 11 (1996), pp.169-178.

Google Scholar

[15] J.R. Heath and H.J. Wilson: Br. Dent. J. Vol. 140 (1976), pp.131-137.

Google Scholar

[16] L. Borchers, F. Tavassol and H. Tschernitschek, J. Prosthet. Dent. Vol. 82 (1999), pp.550-556.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Maalhagh-Fard, W.C. Wagner, F.E. Pink and AM. Neme, Operative Dent. Vol. 28 (2003), pp.734-739.

Google Scholar

[18] K. Kato, N. Nagata , Y. Sakai, M. Shiba and M. Kojima., Tokyo Ika Shika Daigaku Iyo Kizai Kenkyusho Hokoku, Vol. 4 (1970), pp.115-128.

Google Scholar

[19] Y.H. Silolzis, H. Yang, L. Yang, J. Zhang and J. Chen, J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Techn. Med. Sci. Vol. 26 (2006), pp.257-260.

Google Scholar

[20] Robert Koch-Klinik, Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig. adrian. gillissen@sanktgeorg. de.

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.