The Performance Management after Mergers and Acquisitions in High Technology Manufacturing Business

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article aims to determine the main factors that affect the performance management strategy in high technology manufacturing Greek companies after a merger or an acquisition. For this purpose the article is based not only on the latest literature in performance management strategy, but also to interviews of executive members of manufacturing Greek companies and to the primary results of a quantitative analysis in some Greek companies that operate in manufacturing business and had in the near past a change in their environment due to a merger or acquisition. Findings indicate factors such as leadership, learning, teamwork and recognition as the ones that main affect the performance management of the company.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

171-175

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Armstrong, 'Performance Management. Key strategies and practical guidelines`3rd edition, 2006, pp.2-5.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Reynolds, Helping People Learn, CIPD, London, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] C. Gorelick, B. Tantawy-Monsou, and Sugarman, B., For performance through learning, Knowledge management is the critical practice, The learning Organization, Vol. 12 No2, 2005, pp.125-139.

DOI: 10.1108/09696470510583511

Google Scholar

[4] S. Zuboff, In the Age of the Smart Machine, Basic Books, New York, NY., (1988).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Schwandt and M. Marquardt, Organizational Learning: From World-class Theories to Global Best Practices, St Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL., (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] D. Schwandt, Organizational learning: a dynamic integrative construct, unpublished manuscript used in the George Washington University Executive Leadership in Human Resources Development Program, George Washington University, Washington, DC., (1993).

DOI: 10.15420/aer.2018.7.1.l1.r1

Google Scholar

[7] L Baird and J. Henderson, The Knowledge Engine: How to Create Fast Cycles of Knowledge-to-Performance and Performance-to-Knowledge, Barrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA, (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] C. Gorelick, , N. Milton and K. April, Performance through Learning: Knowledge Management in Practice, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] M. A . Frohman, Do Teams…But Do Them Right, Industry Week. 1995, April 3.

Google Scholar

[10] E. E . Lawler, Pay and Organizational Development,. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1981).

Google Scholar

[11] Vakkuri, J. and Meklin, P. (2003), The impact of culture on the use of performance measurement information in the university setting, Management Decision, Vol. 41 No. 8, pp.751-9.

DOI: 10.1108/00251740310496260

Google Scholar