Influential Parameters in Determination of Chip Shape in High Speed Machining

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cutting processes in machining involves the elastic and plastic formation where a layer of material is removed by a cutting tool to be removed from the workpiece in forms of various types of small chips. In this paper, a series of finite element simulations of 2D chip formation with various parameters are presented. Different types of chip shapes, such as continuous, discontinuous and serrated shape, are simulated under different conditions. A damage evolution technique based on fracture energy dissipation during material damage progression is used to demonstrate the influences on chip formation. It is concluded that the fracture energy in damage evolution is a crucial factor for the determination of chip shape. Further the influence of depth of cut and rake angle are considered in the simulations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

211-216

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Komanduri: Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. Vol. 11(1971), pp.223-233.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Obhuchi and T. Obikawa: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology Transactions of the ASME Vol. 125 (2003), pp.324-332.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Shet and X. Deng: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 105 (2000), pp.95-109.

Google Scholar

[4] J.M. Huang and J.T. Black: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering Vol. 118 (1996), pp.545-553.

Google Scholar

[5] T. Özel and E. Zeren: Int. J. Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 35 (2007), pp.255-267.

Google Scholar

[6] W. Jinsheng, G. Yadong, A. Gabriel, A. F Jean and S. Jiashun: Int. J. Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 45 (2009), pp.430-447.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Özel: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 209 (2009), pp.5167-5177.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Mabrouki, F. Girardin, M. Asad, and J-F. Rigal: Int. Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture Vol. 48 (2008), pp.1187-1197.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.03.013

Google Scholar

[9] J. Lorentzon, N. Järvståt, and B.L. Josefson: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 209 (2009), pp.4645-4653.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Calamaz, D. Coupard, M. Nouari, F. Girot: Int. J. Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 52 (2011), pp.887-895.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2789-x

Google Scholar

[11] ABAQUS/CAE User's Manual, Version 6. 8, (2009).

Google Scholar

[12] R. Ambati and H. Yuan: Int. J. Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2010), doi: 10. 1007/s00170-010-2818-9.

Google Scholar

[13] M Asad, C. Hignette, T. Mabrouki, J-F. Rigal: 2nd International Conference on Innovative Cutting Processes and Smart Machining (2008) Cluny, Burgundy, France.

Google Scholar

[14] G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 21 (1985), pp.31-48.

Google Scholar

[15] S.P.F.C. Jaspers and J.H. Dautzenberg: Journal of Materials Processing Technologies Vol. 121 (2002), pp.123-135.

Google Scholar

[16] X. Teng and T. Wierzbicki: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 73 (2006), pp.1653-1678.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Hillerborg, M. Modéer and P-E. Peterson: Cement and Concrete Research Vol. 1 (1976), pp.773-781.

Google Scholar