Applying a Six Sigma MAIC Process to Improve the Quality of Lens Camera Production

Article Preview

Abstract:

The rapid development of technology has led to the increased embracing of portable consumer electronics, such as mobile phones, digital cameras, and notebook computers. The lens cameras installed in these electronics are indispensable, and the function and quality of lens cameras have gained increasing attention. This study examines the production processes of lens camera products, utilizing the production capacity indicator Cpm to develop an evaluation model. This approach seeks to determine the important product quality characteristic production processes that have a detrimental impact on lens camera product quality. This study then applies a Six Sigma MAIC product quality improvement process to analyze the reasons for poor product quality, utilizing the Taguchi experimental design to examine the optimal production parameters; this study attempts to control production process quality through applying controls to these parameters. Ultimately, this study attempts to utilize Six Sigma MAIC processes to continually improve the quality of lens camera production processes, helping companies to increase the quality of their lens camera products and improve their competitive positions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

301-310

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bothe, D. R., (1992) A Capability Study for an Entire Product,. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions, Vol. 46, p.172–178.

Google Scholar

[2] Boyles, R. A., (1994) Process Capability with Asymmetric Tolerances, Communications in Statistic: Computer & Simulation, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp.615-643.

Google Scholar

[3] Chan, L. K., Cheng, S. W., and Spring, F. A., (1988) A new Measure of Process Capability Cpm, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.162-175.

Google Scholar

[4] Chen, K. S., Pearn, W. L., and Lin, P. C., (2003) Capability Measures for Processes with Multiple Characteristics, Quality & Reliability Engineering International , Vol. 19, pp.101-110.

DOI: 10.1002/qre.513

Google Scholar

[5] Chen, K. S., Wang, C. H., and Chen, H. T., (2006) A MAIC approach to TFT-LCD Panel Quality Improvement, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 46, pp.1189-1198.

DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2005.10.003

Google Scholar

[6] Cheng, F. T., Chen, K. S., and Sung, W. P., (2005) Evaluation Model for the Performance of Multi-Manufacturing Schedule, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 27, No. 3-4, pp.345-350.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2173-9

Google Scholar

[7] Ham, C. H., and Lee, Y. H., (2002) Intelligent Integrated Plant Operation System for Six Sigma, Annual Reviews in Control, Vol. 26, pp.27-43.

DOI: 10.1016/s1367-5788(02)80008-6

Google Scholar

[8] Huang, C. F., Chen, K. S., Sheu, S. H., and Sheu, T. S., (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] Kane, V. E., (1986) Process Capability Indices, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.41-52.

Google Scholar

[10] Kevin L., Roger G. S., Srilata Z., and Adrian S. C., (2003) Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective,. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21, pp.193-203.

Google Scholar

[11] Taguchi G., (1987) System of experimental design: Engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize cost. UNIPUB, White Plains, New York.

Google Scholar

[12] Taguchi, G., (1991) Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organization, UNIPUB, White Plains, New York.

Google Scholar