Maturity Model for the Development of New Forming Processes Applied to the Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming

Article Preview

Abstract:

Forming processes are characterized by high cost-effectiveness due to high material utilization and short forming process time. Therefore the development of new forming processes aims for overcoming the current process limitations to produce function extended components with a wider range of application and lower manufacturing costs. The comprehensive and complex development investigations of cause-effect relationships and interdependencies lead to an intransparent development status, whose assessment is often based on undefined and not reproducible criteria. This can result in wrong decisions with vain modifications that require subsequent changes associated with an increased effort. A valid characterization of the development status of new forming processes by maturity determination in early development phases can detect improvement potentials in order to apply effective measures with reduced efforts. Maturity models provide essential indicators and assign their values to maturity levels, whereby a uniform assessment base is created and comparability of the determined maturity values is ensured. On the basis of a combined reference model maturity-related indicators for assessing the development status of new forming processes are defined. The designed maturity model has been applied in the development of the Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 504-506)

Pages:

1011-1016

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Merklein, J. Koch, T. Schneider, S. Opel, U. Vierzigmann, Manufacturing of Complex Functional Components with Variants by Using a new Metal Forming Process - Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming. International Journal of Material Forming 1 (2010) 347-350.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-010-0778-0

Google Scholar

[2] A. Weckenmann, B.-A. Behrens, E. Reithmeier et al., Appliance of the maturity method in the development of endoscopic geometry inspection for Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming tools. Total Quality Management & Excellence 39 (2011) 11-16.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Weckenmann, G. Akkasoglu, Maturity Method for the Development of Metal Forming Processes considering Fuzzy Input Parameters. In: Akkök, M. et al. (Eds.), 6th Intl. Conf. on Design and Production of Machines and Dies/Molds - DIEMOLD, Atilim University, Ankara, 2011, pp.9-15.

Google Scholar

[4] Information on http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/10tr033.pdf as of 07.01.(2012)

Google Scholar

[5] ISO/IEC 15504:2004, Software Engineering - Process Assessment

Google Scholar

[6] P. Berg et al., Assessment of quality and maturity level of R&D. In: D.F. Kocaoglu et al. (Eds.), Intl. Conf. on Mgmt. of Eng. and Tech. PICMET, Portland, 2001, pp.168-182.

Google Scholar

[7] T. de Bruin et al., Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model. ACIS 2005 Proceedings, Paper 109. Information on http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2005/109 as of 07.01.(2012)

Google Scholar

[8] J. Becker et al., Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Wirtschaftsinformatik 51 (2009) 249-260.

Google Scholar

[9] Information on http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.2/PDF as of 07.01.(2012)

Google Scholar

[10] P.-F. Brenner, A. Weckenmann, G. Akkasoglu, Reifegradmethode für neue Fertigungsverfahren - Rasch und sicher auf neue Wege. Qualität und Zuverlässigkeit 55 (2010) 52-55.

Google Scholar

[11] W. L. Oberkampf, M. Pilch, T. G. Trucano, Predictive Capability Maturity Model for Computational Modeling and Simulation. Sandia National Laboratories, Washington, 2007.

DOI: 10.2172/976951

Google Scholar