AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Parameters Identification through Inverse Analysis at 713 K

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper introduces a fast and accurate procedure for determining the constants of magnesium AZ31 alloy at 713 K. The material behaviour is modelled by means of the power law relationship between the equivalent flow stress, the equivalent strain and the equivalent strain-rate within a narrow equivalent strain-rate range. Bulging tests were carried out in isothermal conditions (713 K) and at constant pressure in order to determine the material constants. It is necessary to evaluate the displacement and the thickness evolutions at the dome apex of the metal sheet. The time-displacement curve was obtained by laser measurements whereas a large number of bulging tests, interrupted at preset time intervals, were carried out to evaluate the thickness. The thickness was measured directly using a two-digit micrometer. The material constants, m, n and K were obtained in the power law relationship by means of constant pressure bulging tests coupled with the use of an inverse analysis technique. The results of comparison between experimental and numerical tests are shown and they indicate that the material constants can be accurately evaluated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 504-506)

Pages:

643-646

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Grimes, Superplastic forming of magnesium alloys, in: G. Giuliano (Ed.), Superplastic forming of advanced metallic materials, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, 2011, pp.304-326.

DOI: 10.1533/9780857092779.3.304

Google Scholar

[2] N. Chandra, Constitutive Behaviour of superplastic materials, Int J Non Linear Mech, 37 (2002) 461–484.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Jovane, An Approximate Analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm, Int J Mech Sci, 10 (1968) 403–427.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(68)90005-2

Google Scholar

[4] G. Giuliano and S. Franchitti, On the evaluation of superplastic characteristics using FEM, Int J Mach Tool Manu, 47 (2007) 471-476.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Giuliano, Mathematical modelling of superplastic metal sheet forming processes, in: G. Giuliano (Ed.), Superplastic forming of advanced metallic materials, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK, 2011, pp.304-326.

DOI: 10.1533/9780857092779.2.115

Google Scholar

[6] G. Giuliano and S. Franchitti, The determination of material parameters from superplastic free forming test of an AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet, Int J Mach Tool Manu, 48 (2008) 1519-1522.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0203-0

Google Scholar

[7] F.U. Enikeev and A.A. Kruglov, An analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm, Int J Mech Sci, 37 (1995) 473-483.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(94)00081-t

Google Scholar