Any Effect of Processing History on Precipitation Hardening of Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

The strain induced martensite formation is known to be sensitive to the stress state [1]. The amount of martensite formed varies if the same amount of load is applied in different states of stress. For example, martensite formed is maximum in tension, minimum in compression and somewhere in between, in shear. Martensite could also originate due to elastic stress, or in absence of any mechanical energy, solely, by change in temperature (thermal martensite). Thus, it is the aim of this project to understand the different kinds of martensite that originate due to different processing paths and then, to understand how the precipitation behaviour is affected by the process of arriving at the martensite. Basically, it is to understand how the dislocation substructure varies under various stress states and thermal states, and how it affects the kinetics and type of precipitation in metastable austenitic stainless steels. This work is carried out with a high alloy, metastable and precipitation hardenable stainless steel called Sandvik NanoflexTM. Formation of strain induced martensite in semi austenitic metastable stainless steels is strongly a function of strain rate. It is also a function of stress state: in this study a planer planar shear state and an axial tensile state of stress are compared. The morphology of martensite formed in tension is different from that in shear. Predominantly sheared samples show rippled structures with ridges and valleys where as predominantly tensile deformation creates samples with planer planar laths separated by crevasse-like boundaries. The morphological difference in the martensite formed under different stress-states, creates different shape of precipitates in semi austenitic metatstable stainless steels. The predominantly sheared samples show roundish precipitates where as predominantly tensile deformed samples show precipitates with a core. Difference in the dislocation substructure is thought to be the root cause of such morphological differences in the martensite and precipitates formed through different stress states.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 504-506)

Pages:

851-856

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.-C. Videau, G. Cailletaud and A. Pineau: J. Phys. IV, 1996, 6, 465–474.

Google Scholar

[2] Nishiyama N. Martensitic transformation. London: Academic Press; 1978.

Google Scholar

[3] Venables JA. Philos Mag 1962;7:35–44.

Google Scholar

[4] Huang GL, Matlock DK, Krauss G. Metall Trans A 1989;20:1239–46.

Google Scholar

[5] Guo Z, Rong Y, Chen S, Hsu TY, Xu Zuyao. Scripta Mater 1999;41:153–8.

Google Scholar

[6] Huang P, Lopez HF. Mater Lett 1999;39:244–8.

Google Scholar

[7] Anderson M, Stalmans R, A ˚ gren J. In: Beyer J, Bo¨ ttger A, Mulder JH, editors. Proceedings of ESOMAT '97, Enschede, 1–5 July; 1997. [J. de Physique, p. C5–125.]

Google Scholar

[8] Tavares SSM, Gunderov D, Stolyarov V, Neto JM. Mater Sci Eng A 2003;358:32–6.

Google Scholar

[9] N. Bergeon, G. Guenin, C. Esnouf in: J. Beyer, A. Bo¨ ttger, J. H. Mulder, editors. Proceedings of ESOMAT '97, Enschede, 1–5 July; 1997. [J. de Physique, p. C5–411.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Post, PhD Thesis, "On the Constitutive Behaviour of Sandvik Nanoflex", University of Twente, 2004, ISBN 90-6464-974-X.

Google Scholar

[11] Mechanical Metallurgy (SI edition), George.E.Dieter, Stengthening Mechanism, 212-213.

Google Scholar

[12] K. Datta, H. J. M. Geijselaers and H. D. van Corbach, Shear tests carried out at the bi-axial testing machine, Applied Mechanics, University of Twente, October 2010.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Saha, Effect of processing History on Precipitation Hardening of Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steels, under-graduate dissertation thesis, final year Metallurgical and Material Engineering,Jadavpur University during the session 2010-2011, May 2011.

Google Scholar

[14] Mats Hättestrand, , a, Jan-Olof Nilsson, Krystyna Stiller, Ping Liu and Marcus Andersson, Precipitation hardening in a 12%Cr–9%Ni–4%Mo–2%Cu stainless steel, Acta Materialia, Volume 52, Issue 4, 23 February 2004, 1023-1037.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.048

Google Scholar